Does the Conference of Disarmament Have a Future?

IF 0.5 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/25751654.2021.1993632
Paul Meyer
{"title":"Does the Conference of Disarmament Have a Future?","authors":"Paul Meyer","doi":"10.1080/25751654.2021.1993632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Conference on Disarmament (CD) has been in a prolonged state of paralysis. Since its negotiation of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) in 1996, it has not produced any other agreement and has been unable even to agree on a Programme of Work. The dysfunction of the CD has been a product of its extreme version of the consensus rule for decision-making and a counter-productive dynamic among its 65 member states that privileges national preference over the collective good that compromise could yield. The bankruptcy of the CD erodes the credibility of the multilateral disarmament enterprise as does the complicity of its members in perpetuating a diplomatic charade. Moving its core issues out of the CD and into negotiating forums not vulnerable to a de facto “veto” provides an escape route for those states genuinely interested in making progress. Without the political will to engage in creative diplomacy to break out of the CD’s straitjacket, the outlook for the future of the UN’s “single multilateral disarmament negotiating forum” looks bleak.","PeriodicalId":32607,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament","volume":"4 1","pages":"287 - 294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2021.1993632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Conference on Disarmament (CD) has been in a prolonged state of paralysis. Since its negotiation of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) in 1996, it has not produced any other agreement and has been unable even to agree on a Programme of Work. The dysfunction of the CD has been a product of its extreme version of the consensus rule for decision-making and a counter-productive dynamic among its 65 member states that privileges national preference over the collective good that compromise could yield. The bankruptcy of the CD erodes the credibility of the multilateral disarmament enterprise as does the complicity of its members in perpetuating a diplomatic charade. Moving its core issues out of the CD and into negotiating forums not vulnerable to a de facto “veto” provides an escape route for those states genuinely interested in making progress. Without the political will to engage in creative diplomacy to break out of the CD’s straitjacket, the outlook for the future of the UN’s “single multilateral disarmament negotiating forum” looks bleak.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
裁军谈判会议有未来吗?
摘要裁军谈判会议长期处于瘫痪状态。自1996年谈判《全面禁试条约》以来,它没有达成任何其他协议,甚至无法就工作方案达成一致。裁谈会的功能失调是其决策共识规则的极端版本的产物,也是其65个成员国之间的一种适得其反的动态,这种动态将国家偏好置于妥协可能产生的集体利益之上。裁谈会的破产损害了多边裁军事业的信誉,裁谈会成员国共谋使外交把戏长期存在也是如此。将其核心问题从裁谈会转移到不易受到事实上“否决”影响的谈判论坛,为那些真正有兴趣取得进展的国家提供了一条逃生之路。如果没有参与创造性外交以突破裁谈会束缚的政治意愿,联合国“单一多边裁军谈判论坛”的未来前景看起来很黯淡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Synergistic Effects of Deterrence by Denial and Safeguards in the Biological Weapons Convention: Building on the History of International Nuclear Safeguards The Limits of Anti-Nuclear Critique in Pakistan Contested Nuclear Sharing in Belgium: Domestic Political Dynamic for the Nuclear Weapons Ban Logic (or Illogic?) of Japan’s Aversion to TPNW and Charting a Path Forward Nuclear-Conventional Entanglement in Northeast Asia: The Case for Crisis Management Interoperability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1