Assessment of models to predict surface subsidence in the Czech part of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin - Case study

IF 0.9 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia Pub Date : 2020-11-25 DOI:10.13168/agg.2020.0034
E. Jirankova
{"title":"Assessment of models to predict surface subsidence in the Czech part of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin - Case study","authors":"E. Jirankova","doi":"10.13168/agg.2020.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This case study presents the verification of two surface subsidence prediction models for longwall mining at depths greater than 400 m. The surface subsidence points were surveyed and compared for both models. The first model uses empirical calculations to predict the surface subsidence. This method is reliable for predicting surface subsidence at shallower depths. At present, however, coal mining has progressed to great depths. The second model is the 2-dimensional finite element method to predict surface subsidence. In contrast to the first method, this method is based on the regional parameters and uses the rock mass properties to evaluate surface subsidence for multiseams at any depth. Results show that the finite element method gives a better approximation of the measured surface subsidence than the Knothe method. The maximum surface subsidence, which was determined by the FEM method, was used to adjust the extraction coefficient in the Knothe's method. The predicted value differs from the measured value by 8 %. The slope of the predicted subsidence trough was within the range of 2‒8 % from the surveyed subsidence. This case study proposes a procedure for using both models to successfully predict the surface subsidence. ARTICLE INFO","PeriodicalId":50899,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13168/agg.2020.0034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This case study presents the verification of two surface subsidence prediction models for longwall mining at depths greater than 400 m. The surface subsidence points were surveyed and compared for both models. The first model uses empirical calculations to predict the surface subsidence. This method is reliable for predicting surface subsidence at shallower depths. At present, however, coal mining has progressed to great depths. The second model is the 2-dimensional finite element method to predict surface subsidence. In contrast to the first method, this method is based on the regional parameters and uses the rock mass properties to evaluate surface subsidence for multiseams at any depth. Results show that the finite element method gives a better approximation of the measured surface subsidence than the Knothe method. The maximum surface subsidence, which was determined by the FEM method, was used to adjust the extraction coefficient in the Knothe's method. The predicted value differs from the measured value by 8 %. The slope of the predicted subsidence trough was within the range of 2‒8 % from the surveyed subsidence. This case study proposes a procedure for using both models to successfully predict the surface subsidence. ARTICLE INFO
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上西里西亚煤盆地捷克部分地表沉降预测模型评价——案例研究
本案例研究验证了深度大于400m的长壁开采的两个地表沉降预测模型。对两个模型的地表沉降点进行了调查和比较。第一个模型使用经验计算来预测地表沉降。这种方法在预测浅层地表沉降方面是可靠的。然而,目前,煤矿开采已经发展到了很深的程度。第二个模型是预测地表沉降的二维有限元方法。与第一种方法相比,该方法基于区域参数,并使用岩体特性来评估任何深度多夹层的地表沉降。结果表明,与Knothe法相比,有限元法能更好地逼近实测地表沉降。利用有限元法确定的最大地表沉降来调整Knothe's法中的提取系数。预测值与实测值相差8%。预测沉降槽的坡度在调查沉降的2-8%范围内。本案例研究提出了一种使用这两种模型成功预测地表沉降的程序。文章信息
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia
Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Acta geodynamica et geomaterialia (AGG) has been published by the Institute of Rock Structures and Mechanics, Czech Academy of Sciences since 2004, formerly known as Acta Montana published from the beginning of sixties till 2003. Approximately 40 articles per year in four issues are published, covering observations related to central Europe and new theoretical developments and interpretations in these disciplines. It is possible to publish occasionally research articles from other regions of the world, only if they present substantial advance in methodological or theoretical development with worldwide impact. The Board of Editors is international in representation.
期刊最新文献
Improvement of expansive soil by microwave irradiation iquid limit determination of medium to high plasticity Algerian soils using fall-cone vs Casagrande percussion cup methods Differences in strength, seepage, and acoustic emission characteristics of raw coal and briquette coal samples: A triaxial compression experiment investigation Identifying the geological structure of the Garyan area in northwest Libya using eigen-6c4 satellite gravity data Comparative analysis of PCS and ICA on trend estimation of sea-level change from tide gauge observations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1