Country Institutional Environments in Promoting Entrepreneurship: Assessment Based on Developing Economies in Asia

IF 1.2 Q4 BUSINESS Journal of East-West Business Pub Date : 2021-05-13 DOI:10.1080/10669868.2021.1921895
T. C. Chew, Tarun Kanti Bose, Yaoyao Fan
{"title":"Country Institutional Environments in Promoting Entrepreneurship: Assessment Based on Developing Economies in Asia","authors":"T. C. Chew, Tarun Kanti Bose, Yaoyao Fan","doi":"10.1080/10669868.2021.1921895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Previous studies have shown that institutional environments play an important role in explaining entrepreneurship in a given country. Yet, most of the extant studies focus on samples derived from developed-economies. While some attentions have been given to countries in developing economies, the focus was mainly on a few rapidly developing countries whereas others remain largely under-explored. Moreover, developing countries in the Asian region provides a compelling context to be studied as it espouses different institutional logics. To address these issues, we assess the perceptions of the regulatory, cognitive, and normative institutional dimensions that may promote entrepreneurship in a sample of 701 business students from three Asian’s developing economies: Malaysia, Bangladesh, and China. In general, the overall institutional environments level for Malaysia and China are perceived as favorable for entrepreneurship whereas Bangladesh is perceived as relatively less favorable for entrepreneurship. Moreover, results suggest that there are significant differences in the country’s institutional environments between Bangladesh and Malaysia, as well as between Bangladesh and China. These results revealed important cross-national differences and invariance between the three countries in the same Asian region. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":44266,"journal":{"name":"Journal of East-West Business","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10669868.2021.1921895","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of East-West Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669868.2021.1921895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Previous studies have shown that institutional environments play an important role in explaining entrepreneurship in a given country. Yet, most of the extant studies focus on samples derived from developed-economies. While some attentions have been given to countries in developing economies, the focus was mainly on a few rapidly developing countries whereas others remain largely under-explored. Moreover, developing countries in the Asian region provides a compelling context to be studied as it espouses different institutional logics. To address these issues, we assess the perceptions of the regulatory, cognitive, and normative institutional dimensions that may promote entrepreneurship in a sample of 701 business students from three Asian’s developing economies: Malaysia, Bangladesh, and China. In general, the overall institutional environments level for Malaysia and China are perceived as favorable for entrepreneurship whereas Bangladesh is perceived as relatively less favorable for entrepreneurship. Moreover, results suggest that there are significant differences in the country’s institutional environments between Bangladesh and Malaysia, as well as between Bangladesh and China. These results revealed important cross-national differences and invariance between the three countries in the same Asian region. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进创业的国家制度环境:基于亚洲发展中经济体的评估
摘要先前的研究表明,制度环境在解释特定国家的创业精神方面发挥着重要作用。然而,大多数现存的研究都集中在发达经济体的样本上。虽然对发展中经济体的国家给予了一些关注,但重点主要放在少数快速发展的国家,而其他国家在很大程度上仍处于探索不足的状态。此外,亚洲地区的发展中国家提供了一个令人信服的研究背景,因为它支持不同的制度逻辑。为了解决这些问题,我们对来自三个亚洲发展中经济体(马来西亚、孟加拉国和中国)的701名商学院学生的样本进行了评估,这些学生对可能促进创业的监管、认知和规范制度层面的看法。总体而言,马来西亚和中国的总体制度环境水平被认为有利于创业,而孟加拉国则被认为相对不太利于创业。此外,研究结果表明,孟加拉国和马来西亚以及孟加拉国和中国的制度环境存在显著差异。这些结果揭示了同一亚洲地区的三个国家之间重要的跨国家差异和不变性。讨论了对未来研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
26.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Journal of East-West Business is a quarterly journal that deals with contemporary and emerging aspects of business studies, strategies, development, and practice as they relate to the Russian Federation, the new republics of the Commonwealth of Independent States, and Eastern/Central Europe-and business relationships with other countries of the world. The Journal of East-West Business is international in scope and treats business issues from comparative, cross-cultural, and cross-national perspectives. The journal features an Editorial Advisory Board that represents the Russian Federation, Eastern/Central European, and Baltic states in this new business arena.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Nexus Link of Foreign Direct Investment Inflows and Openness on Economic Growth: Evidence from BRICS Economies Do Remittances and Financial Development Promote International Reserves in BRICS Economies? The Development of Tajikistan’s Apparel Firms in the Global Value Chains: Upgrading and Challenges Nexus Between Energy Consumption and Sustainable Economic Growth in CIS Countries Mobile Banking Intention: Nexus Between Innovation, Tech Adoption, and Gamification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1