Intravenous magnesium sulfate versus intravenous meperidine to prevent shivering during spinal anesthesia

IF 0.5 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medical Journal of Indonesia Pub Date : 2022-07-05 DOI:10.13181/mji.oa.225886
Pryambodho, S. Manggala, Magdalena Sihombing
{"title":"Intravenous magnesium sulfate versus intravenous meperidine to prevent shivering during spinal anesthesia","authors":"Pryambodho, S. Manggala, Magdalena Sihombing","doi":"10.13181/mji.oa.225886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Shivering is a frequent event during neuraxial anesthesia due to impaired central and peripheral thermoregulation control. Meperidine and MgSO4 are effective in lowering the shivering threshold. Hence, this study aimed to compare the efficacy of MgSO4 and meperidine to prevent shivering in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia. \nMETHODS This was a double-blind randomized clinical trial of 100 patients divided into 2 groups. One group had MgSO4 30 mg/kg, and the other group had meperidine 0.5 mg/kg intravenously in 100 ml of 0.9% NaCl before undergoing spinal anesthesia. Participants were non-pregnant patients aged 18–65 years and had physical status I or II (based on the American Society of Anesthesiologist). Shivering was considered significant if it occurred in grade 3 or 4. Patient characteristics, shivering degree, tympanic membrane temperature, and side effects were recorded. \nRESULTS Shivering occurred 10% in the MgSO4 group and 19% in the meperidine group, with p = 0.23. Both groups had similar side effects of nausea, vomiting, and hypotension. \nCONCLUSIONS MgSO4 30 mg/kg was not superior to meperidine 0.5 mg/kg intravenously in preventing shivering in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.","PeriodicalId":18302,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.oa.225886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Shivering is a frequent event during neuraxial anesthesia due to impaired central and peripheral thermoregulation control. Meperidine and MgSO4 are effective in lowering the shivering threshold. Hence, this study aimed to compare the efficacy of MgSO4 and meperidine to prevent shivering in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia. METHODS This was a double-blind randomized clinical trial of 100 patients divided into 2 groups. One group had MgSO4 30 mg/kg, and the other group had meperidine 0.5 mg/kg intravenously in 100 ml of 0.9% NaCl before undergoing spinal anesthesia. Participants were non-pregnant patients aged 18–65 years and had physical status I or II (based on the American Society of Anesthesiologist). Shivering was considered significant if it occurred in grade 3 or 4. Patient characteristics, shivering degree, tympanic membrane temperature, and side effects were recorded. RESULTS Shivering occurred 10% in the MgSO4 group and 19% in the meperidine group, with p = 0.23. Both groups had similar side effects of nausea, vomiting, and hypotension. CONCLUSIONS MgSO4 30 mg/kg was not superior to meperidine 0.5 mg/kg intravenously in preventing shivering in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉注射硫酸镁与静脉注射哌替啶预防脊髓麻醉期间的寒战
背景由于中枢和外周温度调节控制受损,在轴索麻醉过程中,颤抖是一种常见的事件。甲基哌啶和硫酸镁能有效降低颤抖阈值。因此,本研究旨在比较硫酸镁和哌替啶预防脊柱麻醉患者颤抖的疗效。方法对100例患者进行双盲随机临床试验,分为2组。一组在接受脊髓麻醉前,用MgSO4 30 mg/kg,另一组在100 ml 0.9%NaCl中静脉注射美哌啶0.5 mg/kg。参与者是18-65岁的非孕妇,身体状况为I或II(根据美国麻醉师协会)。如果发生在3或4年级,颤抖被认为是显著的。记录患者特征、颤抖程度、鼓膜温度和副作用。结果硫酸镁组和美哌替啶组分别有10%和19%的颤抖发生,p=0.23。两组患者的恶心、呕吐和低血压副作用相似。结论在预防脊麻患者颤抖方面,30 mg/kg硫酸镁的静脉注射效果并不优于0.5 mg/kg美哌替啶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Indonesia
Medical Journal of Indonesia MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Journal of Indonesia is a peer-reviewed and open access journal that focuses on promoting medical sciences generated from basic sciences, clinical, and community or public health research to integrate researches in all aspects of human health. This journal publishes original articles, reviews, and also interesting case reports. Brief communications containing short features of medicine, latest developments in diagnostic procedures, treatment, or other health issues that is important for the development of health care system are also acceptable. Letters and commentaries of our published articles are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Central line-associated bloodstream infection related with umbilical vein catheterization and peripherally inserted central catheter in preterm infants: a meta-analysis and systematic review Commonly misdiagnosed round pneumonia in a child: a case report Effect of arum manis mango peel extract on cholesterol and triglyceride levels in dyslipidemic Sprague-Dawley rats Effects of methotrexate, Moringa oleifera, and Andrographis paniculata extracts on the myocardial and aortic tissue of streptozotocin-nicotinamide-induced hyperglycemic rats Lateral facial profile of β-thalassemia major in Javanese children: a photogrammetric analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1