Dada Magazines: The Making of a Movement by Emily Hage (review)

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Modernism/modernity Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1353/mod.2022.0016
Lori Cole
{"title":"Dada Magazines: The Making of a Movement by Emily Hage (review)","authors":"Lori Cole","doi":"10.1353/mod.2022.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"452 decision to “give” Rezia his elbow, “a piece of bone,” as they cross the streets of London.2) In particular, Colesworthy carefully looks at Peter Walsh looking at Clarissa. For someone who claims to disdain Clarissa’s social gifts, Peter spends an awful lot of time thinking about them. As Colesworthy writes, “In thinking about Clarissa and her gift, Peter helps to prove her understanding of how individuals feel and think period—her sense that one’s personal experience is never entirely one’s own but a gift we take from and give to other people” (80). Consciousness can’t be separated from sociality; modernism can’t be separated from the gift and vice versa. “To think in Mrs. Dalloway,” Colesworthy writes, “is to feel and imagine oneself to be caught up in a web of gift exchange” (76). To read Returning the Gift is to recognize how important this web was to modernism more generally—and to be reminded how frequently the best modernist scholarship is itself web-like. Colesworthy makes the case that this is so because modernism was itself web-like, the social connecting to the aesthetic, the political to the poetic. Perhaps the best way to think with modernism is to think like modernism, and Colesworthy, in this interdisciplinary study, does just that.","PeriodicalId":18699,"journal":{"name":"Modernism/modernity","volume":"29 1","pages":"452 - 454"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modernism/modernity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mod.2022.0016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

452 decision to “give” Rezia his elbow, “a piece of bone,” as they cross the streets of London.2) In particular, Colesworthy carefully looks at Peter Walsh looking at Clarissa. For someone who claims to disdain Clarissa’s social gifts, Peter spends an awful lot of time thinking about them. As Colesworthy writes, “In thinking about Clarissa and her gift, Peter helps to prove her understanding of how individuals feel and think period—her sense that one’s personal experience is never entirely one’s own but a gift we take from and give to other people” (80). Consciousness can’t be separated from sociality; modernism can’t be separated from the gift and vice versa. “To think in Mrs. Dalloway,” Colesworthy writes, “is to feel and imagine oneself to be caught up in a web of gift exchange” (76). To read Returning the Gift is to recognize how important this web was to modernism more generally—and to be reminded how frequently the best modernist scholarship is itself web-like. Colesworthy makes the case that this is so because modernism was itself web-like, the social connecting to the aesthetic, the political to the poetic. Perhaps the best way to think with modernism is to think like modernism, and Colesworthy, in this interdisciplinary study, does just that.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emily Hage的《达达杂志:运动的形成》(评论)
452当他们穿过伦敦的街道时,决定“给”雷齐亚他的肘部,“一块骨头”。2)特别是,科尔斯沃西仔细地看着彼得·沃尔什看着克拉丽莎。对于一个声称蔑视克拉丽莎社交天赋的人来说,彼得花了很多时间思考这些天赋。正如科尔斯沃西所写,“在思考克拉丽莎和她的天赋时,彼得有助于证明她对个人感受和思考的理解——她认为一个人的个人经历从来都不是自己的,而是我们从别人那里得到并送给别人的天赋”(80)。意识离不开社会性;现代主义离不开天赋,反之亦然。科尔斯沃西写道:“在达洛维夫人身上思考,就是感觉和想象自己陷入了礼物交换的网络中”(76)。阅读《归还礼物》,就是要认识到这张网对现代主义的重要性——并提醒人们,最好的现代主义学术是多么频繁地像网一样。科尔斯沃西认为,这是因为现代主义本身就是网络式的,是与美学的社会联系,是与诗意的政治联系。也许用现代主义思考的最好方法是像现代主义一样思考,而科尔斯沃西在这项跨学科研究中正是这样做的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Modernism/modernity
Modernism/modernity HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Concentrating on the period extending roughly from 1860 to the present, Modernism/Modernity focuses on the methodological, archival, and theoretical exigencies particular to modernist studies. It encourages an interdisciplinary approach linking music, architecture, the visual arts, literature, and social and intellectual history. The journal"s broad scope fosters dialogue between social scientists and humanists about the history of modernism and its relations tomodernization. Each issue features a section of thematic essays as well as book reviews and a list of books received. Modernism/Modernity is now the official journal of the Modernist Studies Association.
期刊最新文献
Establishing the normative and comparative needs of assistive technology provision in Queensland from the agency and funding scheme perspective. Bette Davis Black and White by Julia A. Stern (review) Utopian Spontaneity: Adorno's Concept of Mimesis and Surrealist Automatic Writing Telling Time in Modernism Making Us New: From Eugenics to Transhumanism in Modernist Culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1