Minimally Invasive Fixation in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Review Article

S. Tan, M.S-C Kuo, Yu-Cheng Yeh, Meng-Yin Ho, F. Tsuang
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Fixation in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Review Article","authors":"S. Tan, M.S-C Kuo, Yu-Cheng Yeh, Meng-Yin Ho, F. Tsuang","doi":"10.18502/jost.v9i1.12563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"here are several surgical strategies which have been proposed to treat the osteoporotic patient with vertebral fracture, ranging from vertebral body cement augmentation, percutaneous/mini-open short segment pedicle screw fixation, and cortical bone trajectory screw to kyphotic deformity correction surgery. Minimally invasive spine surgery has the potential benefits of faster recovery, reduced blood loss, less postoperative wound pain, lower infection risk, and shorter length of hospital stay. Novel surgical techniques such as percutaneous instrumentation fixation, cortical bone trajectory technique, screw cement augmentation, and vertebral body augmentation are developed. However, various complications have been reported, including pedicle fracture, instrumentation loosening, adjacent-level disc degeneration with herniation, and progressive junctional kyphosis. The purpose of this review was to outline various advancements in minimally invasive spinal surgery for patients with osteoporosis. Minimally invasive surgical techniques for fixation including percutaneous instrumentation, cortical bone trajectory technique, screw cement augmentation, and vertebral body augmentation have benefited patient with osteoporosis. Studies and discussions about short-segment pedicle screw fixation (one level above and below the fracture level) have shown that it provides enough stability for thoracolumbar burst fractures. There are also complications, including cement embolism, adjacent vertebral fracture, neuraxial anesthesia, and infection, which have been observed with the above technique. With the advancement of instrument and technique, the complication rate decreased in recent studies. Minimally invasive fixation still has many advantages for patients with osteoporosis. Many of these studies and strategies only have evidence from biomechanical and cadaveric studies and require further clinical trials to establish their clinical efficacy.","PeriodicalId":34870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopedic and Spine Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jost.v9i1.12563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

here are several surgical strategies which have been proposed to treat the osteoporotic patient with vertebral fracture, ranging from vertebral body cement augmentation, percutaneous/mini-open short segment pedicle screw fixation, and cortical bone trajectory screw to kyphotic deformity correction surgery. Minimally invasive spine surgery has the potential benefits of faster recovery, reduced blood loss, less postoperative wound pain, lower infection risk, and shorter length of hospital stay. Novel surgical techniques such as percutaneous instrumentation fixation, cortical bone trajectory technique, screw cement augmentation, and vertebral body augmentation are developed. However, various complications have been reported, including pedicle fracture, instrumentation loosening, adjacent-level disc degeneration with herniation, and progressive junctional kyphosis. The purpose of this review was to outline various advancements in minimally invasive spinal surgery for patients with osteoporosis. Minimally invasive surgical techniques for fixation including percutaneous instrumentation, cortical bone trajectory technique, screw cement augmentation, and vertebral body augmentation have benefited patient with osteoporosis. Studies and discussions about short-segment pedicle screw fixation (one level above and below the fracture level) have shown that it provides enough stability for thoracolumbar burst fractures. There are also complications, including cement embolism, adjacent vertebral fracture, neuraxial anesthesia, and infection, which have been observed with the above technique. With the advancement of instrument and technique, the complication rate decreased in recent studies. Minimally invasive fixation still has many advantages for patients with osteoporosis. Many of these studies and strategies only have evidence from biomechanical and cadaveric studies and require further clinical trials to establish their clinical efficacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创固定治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折:综述
本文提出了几种治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者的手术策略,包括椎体骨水泥增强术、经皮/微型开放式短节段椎弓根螺钉固定术、皮质骨轨迹螺钉和后凸畸形矫正术。微创脊柱手术具有更快的恢复、减少失血、减少术后伤口疼痛、降低感染风险和缩短住院时间的潜在好处。开发了新的手术技术,如经皮器械固定、皮质骨轨迹技术、螺钉水泥增强和椎体增强。然而,已经报道了各种并发症,包括椎弓根骨折、器械松动、邻近水平椎间盘退变伴疝和进行性交界后凸。这篇综述的目的是概述骨质疏松症患者微创脊柱手术的各种进展。微创手术固定技术,包括经皮器械、皮质骨轨迹技术、螺钉水泥增强术和椎体增强术,使骨质疏松症患者受益。关于短节段椎弓根螺钉内固定(骨折上下一级)的研究和讨论表明,它为胸腰椎爆裂性骨折提供了足够的稳定性。还有并发症,包括水泥栓塞、邻近椎骨骨折、神经轴麻醉和感染,这些都是用上述技术观察到的。近年来,随着仪器技术的进步,并发症发生率有所下降。微创固定对骨质疏松症患者仍有许多优点。这些研究和策略中的许多只有生物力学和尸体研究的证据,需要进一步的临床试验来确定其临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Study of Titanium Elastic Nailing in Forearm Fractures in Elderly Patients Bilateral Asymmetrical Hip Dislocations after Falling from Height: A Case Report and Literature Review Bilateral Radial Head and Neck Nondisplaced Fracture, a Challenge for Treatment: A Case Report Open Soft Tissue Degloving Injuries of Lower Limbs Managed by a Staged Protocol Using Preserved Autologous Skin Graft Comparison of Different Ketofol Procedural Sedation and Analgesic Doses during Orthopedic Procedures in Patients Referred to the Emergency Department: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1