{"title":"A SEMIOTIC PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING MATHEMATICS WITH DIGITAL AND ANALOGUE MATERIAL: PRIMARY SCHOOL CHILDREN ACTING ON STATISTICAL DIAGRAMS","authors":"L. Billion","doi":"10.52041/serj.v22i2.420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on two third-grade students’ work on the same statistical question whereby one acts with analogue material and the other with TinkerPlotsTM. The aim of the research was to find out whether different material influences the actions and, thus, possibly the mathematical interpretations of the learners. To investigate this research interest, a semiotic perspective on mathematical learning according to Peirce was adopted. Based on this perspective, a modification of Mayring’s context analysis was made, which allowed the analysis of actions to reconstruct the learners’ diagram interpretations. From the analyses, there is evidence that some materials can shorten actions and can automatically establish mathematical relationships and, thus, affect the mathematical interpretations of the learners. At times, however, other actions on different materials can also lead to the reconstruction of the same diagram interpretations. Using these insights, implications for mathematics teaching practice were formulated to assist teachers in selecting materials for designing learning environments to support early statistical thinking.","PeriodicalId":38581,"journal":{"name":"Statistics Education Research Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics Education Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v22i2.420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper focuses on two third-grade students’ work on the same statistical question whereby one acts with analogue material and the other with TinkerPlotsTM. The aim of the research was to find out whether different material influences the actions and, thus, possibly the mathematical interpretations of the learners. To investigate this research interest, a semiotic perspective on mathematical learning according to Peirce was adopted. Based on this perspective, a modification of Mayring’s context analysis was made, which allowed the analysis of actions to reconstruct the learners’ diagram interpretations. From the analyses, there is evidence that some materials can shorten actions and can automatically establish mathematical relationships and, thus, affect the mathematical interpretations of the learners. At times, however, other actions on different materials can also lead to the reconstruction of the same diagram interpretations. Using these insights, implications for mathematics teaching practice were formulated to assist teachers in selecting materials for designing learning environments to support early statistical thinking.
期刊介绍:
SERJ is a peer-reviewed electronic journal of the International Association for Statistical Education (IASE) and the International Statistical Institute (ISI). SERJ is published twice a year and is free. SERJ aims to advance research-based knowledge that can help to improve the teaching, learning, and understanding of statistics or probability at all educational levels and in both formal (classroom-based) and informal (out-of-classroom) contexts. Such research may examine, for example, cognitive, motivational, attitudinal, curricular, teaching-related, technology-related, organizational, or societal factors and processes that are related to the development and understanding of stochastic knowledge. In addition, research may focus on how people use or apply statistical and probabilistic information and ideas, broadly viewed. The Journal encourages the submission of quality papers related to the above goals, such as reports of original research (both quantitative and qualitative), integrative and critical reviews of research literature, analyses of research-based theoretical and methodological models, and other types of papers described in full in the Guidelines for Authors. All papers are reviewed internally by an Associate Editor or Editor, and are blind-reviewed by at least two external referees. Contributions in English are recommended. Contributions in French and Spanish will also be considered. A submitted paper must not have been published before or be under consideration for publication elsewhere.