Characterization of Orchard Fields Based on Soil Fertility Index (SOFIX)

Pitchayapa Pholkaw, Quoc Thinh Tran, Takamitsu Kai, Taiki Kawagoe, K. Kubota, Kiwako S. Araki, M. Kubo
{"title":"Characterization of Orchard Fields Based on Soil Fertility Index (SOFIX)","authors":"Pitchayapa Pholkaw, Quoc Thinh Tran, Takamitsu Kai, Taiki Kawagoe, K. Kubota, Kiwako S. Araki, M. Kubo","doi":"10.4236/jacen.2020.93014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil samples from 139 agricultural orchard fields (apple, grape, tea, and \nothers) were analyzed using the soil fertility index. From these samples, an orchard \nfield database was constructed and the soil properties between orchard, upland, \nand paddy fields were compared. The average value of bacterial biomass in the orchard fields \nwas 7.4 × 108 cells/g-soil, ranging from not detected (lower than \n6.6 × 106 cells/g-soil) to 7.7 × 109 cells/g-soil. The \naverage values of total carbon (TC), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus \n(TP), and total potassium (TK), were 24,000 mg/kg (2670 to 128,100 mg/kg), 1460 \nmg/kg (133 to 6400 mg/kg), 1030 mg/kg (142 to 5362 mg/kg), and 5370 mg/kg (1214 \nto 18,155 mg/kg), respectively. The C/N and C/P ratios were 19 (3 to 85) and 27 \n(2 to 101), respectively. Soil properties of the orchard fields were compared \nwith those of the upland and the paddy fields. The average value of bacterial \nbiomass in the orchard fields was almost the same as that in the upland fields \n(8.0 × 108 cells/g-soil), but the number was lower than that in the \npaddy fields (12.9 × 108 cells/g-soil). The average values of TC and \nTN in the orchard fields fell between those in the upland fields (TC: 33,120 \nmg/kg, TN: 2010 mg/kg) and the paddy fields (TC: 15,420 mg/kg, TN: 1080 mg/kg). The relationship \nbetween the bacterial biomass and TC in the orchard fields resembled that in \nthe upland fields. A suitable soil condition for the orchard fields was \ndetermined as TC: ≥25,000 mg/kg, TN: ≥1500 mg/kg, TP: ≥900 mg/kg and TK: 2500 - \n10,000 mg/kg. These \nrecommended values will be effective for the improvement of the soil quality in \nthe orchard fields by enhancing the number and activities of microorganisms.","PeriodicalId":68148,"journal":{"name":"农业化学和环境(英文)","volume":"09 1","pages":"159-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"农业化学和环境(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jacen.2020.93014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Soil samples from 139 agricultural orchard fields (apple, grape, tea, and others) were analyzed using the soil fertility index. From these samples, an orchard field database was constructed and the soil properties between orchard, upland, and paddy fields were compared. The average value of bacterial biomass in the orchard fields was 7.4 × 108 cells/g-soil, ranging from not detected (lower than 6.6 × 106 cells/g-soil) to 7.7 × 109 cells/g-soil. The average values of total carbon (TC), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and total potassium (TK), were 24,000 mg/kg (2670 to 128,100 mg/kg), 1460 mg/kg (133 to 6400 mg/kg), 1030 mg/kg (142 to 5362 mg/kg), and 5370 mg/kg (1214 to 18,155 mg/kg), respectively. The C/N and C/P ratios were 19 (3 to 85) and 27 (2 to 101), respectively. Soil properties of the orchard fields were compared with those of the upland and the paddy fields. The average value of bacterial biomass in the orchard fields was almost the same as that in the upland fields (8.0 × 108 cells/g-soil), but the number was lower than that in the paddy fields (12.9 × 108 cells/g-soil). The average values of TC and TN in the orchard fields fell between those in the upland fields (TC: 33,120 mg/kg, TN: 2010 mg/kg) and the paddy fields (TC: 15,420 mg/kg, TN: 1080 mg/kg). The relationship between the bacterial biomass and TC in the orchard fields resembled that in the upland fields. A suitable soil condition for the orchard fields was determined as TC: ≥25,000 mg/kg, TN: ≥1500 mg/kg, TP: ≥900 mg/kg and TK: 2500 - 10,000 mg/kg. These recommended values will be effective for the improvement of the soil quality in the orchard fields by enhancing the number and activities of microorganisms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于土壤肥力指数(SOFIX)的果园田特征分析
利用土壤肥力指数对139个果园(苹果、葡萄、茶叶等)的土壤样品进行了分析。从这些样本中,建立了果园-田地数据库,并比较了果园、旱地和稻田的土壤特性。果园土壤中细菌生物量的平均值为7.4×108个细胞/g土壤,从未检测到(低于6.6×106个细胞/g土)到7.7×109个细胞/g土都有。总碳(TC)、总氮(TN)、总磷(TP)和总钾(TK)的平均值分别为24000 mg/kg(2670至128100 mg/kg)、1460 mg/kg(133至6400 mg/kg)、1030 mg/kg(142至5362 mg/kg)和5370 mg/kg(1214至18155 mg/kg)。C/N和C/P比率分别为19(3比85)和27(2比101)。将果园的土壤性质与旱地和稻田的土壤性质进行了比较。果园的细菌生物量平均值与旱地几乎相同(8.0×108个细胞/g土壤),但数量低于稻田(12.9×108个单元/g土壤)。果园田TC和TN的平均值介于旱地(TC:33120mg/kg,TN:2010 mg/kg)和稻田(TC:15420mg/kg,TN:1080 mg/kg)之间。果园中细菌生物量与TC的关系与旱地相似。确定了适宜的果园土壤条件为:TC≥25000 mg/kg,TN≥1500 mg/kg,TP≥900 mg/kg,TK 2500~10000 mg/kg。这些推荐值将通过提高微生物的数量和活性,有效改善果园的土壤质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
期刊最新文献
Drivers of the Chemical Quality of Market Gardening Soils in the Urban and Peri-Urban Environment of Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso): Impact of Fertilizers Sources and Sites Location Inventory of Host Plants and Parasitoids of the Fall Armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith), in the Southern Agricultural Zone of Niger Rabbit Intensification Systems in Rwanda: Feeding Influence and Growth Inventory and Management of Fungi Associated with Banana Plant through the Use of Allium ampeloprasum and Cymbopogon citratus Extracts Potential Risks to the Environment as a Result of Pesticide Handling in the Nanumba-North Municipality, Ghana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1