Silvopastoral systems as an alternative for conservation of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in a cattle landscape in Caucasia Colombia

IF 0.5 4区 生物学 Q4 PLANT SCIENCES Caldasia Pub Date : 2022-03-07 DOI:10.15446/CALDASIA.V44N1.83102
Patricia Duque-Vélez, M. Olivera-Angel, M. Wolff
{"title":"Silvopastoral systems as an alternative for conservation of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in a cattle landscape in Caucasia Colombia","authors":"Patricia Duque-Vélez, M. Olivera-Angel, M. Wolff","doi":"10.15446/CALDASIA.V44N1.83102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Silvopastoral systems (SPS) represent an alternative to the environmental impact and biodiversity decline caused by extensive livestock practices. We evaluate the transformation of a conventional pasture parcel into a SPS, and how it alters the diversity of dung beetles, fundamental organisms in these ecosystems. Transects with pitfall traps, baited with excrement were established in SPS, pasture, and forest ecosystems. Differences in the structure of communities were compared through Whittaker curves, the incidence of functional groups, and non-parametric multidimensional scaling. The completeness of the sampling was estimated and the magnitude of change in qD diversity of the SPS concerning pasture and forest ecosystem was calculated for each season. A total of 7446 beetles belonging to twelve genera, fifteen species, and seven morphospecies were collected. The SPS was the environment with the greatest diversity of qD and functional groups after the forest ecosystem. It was more diverse than pasture, 30 % to 50 % richer in species and 10 % to 50 % more diverse in 1D and 2D. It is concluded that the conversion of the conventional pastures to SPS led to changes in the composition and structure of the beetle community, making the SPS a more diverse environment than the pasture in all seasons including the dry one, when conditions are the most adverse. These results suggest that the implementation of SPS is an important measure to preserve and increase the diversity of forest dung beetles in the livestock areas of the country.","PeriodicalId":55293,"journal":{"name":"Caldasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caldasia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/CALDASIA.V44N1.83102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Silvopastoral systems (SPS) represent an alternative to the environmental impact and biodiversity decline caused by extensive livestock practices. We evaluate the transformation of a conventional pasture parcel into a SPS, and how it alters the diversity of dung beetles, fundamental organisms in these ecosystems. Transects with pitfall traps, baited with excrement were established in SPS, pasture, and forest ecosystems. Differences in the structure of communities were compared through Whittaker curves, the incidence of functional groups, and non-parametric multidimensional scaling. The completeness of the sampling was estimated and the magnitude of change in qD diversity of the SPS concerning pasture and forest ecosystem was calculated for each season. A total of 7446 beetles belonging to twelve genera, fifteen species, and seven morphospecies were collected. The SPS was the environment with the greatest diversity of qD and functional groups after the forest ecosystem. It was more diverse than pasture, 30 % to 50 % richer in species and 10 % to 50 % more diverse in 1D and 2D. It is concluded that the conversion of the conventional pastures to SPS led to changes in the composition and structure of the beetle community, making the SPS a more diverse environment than the pasture in all seasons including the dry one, when conditions are the most adverse. These results suggest that the implementation of SPS is an important measure to preserve and increase the diversity of forest dung beetles in the livestock areas of the country.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在哥伦比亚高加索的牛景观中,作为保护屎壳郎(鞘翅目:金龟子科)的替代选择的森林栖息系统
畜牧业系统(SPS)是一种替代广泛畜牧业造成的环境影响和生物多样性下降的方法。我们评估了将传统牧场转变为SPS的情况,以及它如何改变这些生态系统中的基本生物甲虫的多样性。在SPS、牧场和森林生态系统中建立了带有陷阱和排泄物诱饵的Transects。通过Whittaker曲线、官能团的发生率和非参数多维标度来比较社区结构的差异。估计了采样的完整性,并计算了每个季节SPS关于牧场和森林生态系统的qD多样性的变化幅度。共采集了7446只甲虫,隶属于12属、15种和7种形态。SPS是继森林生态系统之后,qD和官能团多样性最大的环境。它比牧场更具多样性,物种丰富30%至50%,1D和2D的多样性高10%至50%。结果表明,传统牧场向SPS的转变导致了甲虫群落的组成和结构的变化,使SPS在包括干旱季节在内的所有季节都比牧场更为多样化,而此时条件最为不利。这些结果表明,实施SPS是保护和增加该国畜牧区森林甲虫多样性的重要措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Caldasia
Caldasia PLANT SCIENCES-ZOOLOGY
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
28
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: La revista está orientada a publicar contribuciones originales escritas en español o inglés relacionadas con la documentación, comprensión y conservación de la diversidad biológica. La revista contempla el tema de la biodiversidad en un sentido amplio y por tanto incluye trabajos en áreas como botánica, zoología, ecología, biodiversidad, biogeografía, taxonomía, sistemática, conservación, y disciplinas afines.
期刊最新文献
Distribución de la colonización micorrízica en las raíces de la orquídea Neotropical <i>Laelia furfuracea</i>Lindl. A Synopsis of the New World Genera of Phileurini (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae), with English and Spanish Keys to the Genera Life history traits and rearing protocol of <i>Microvelia pulchella</i> (Hemiptera: Veliidae): a potential biological control agent and model for behavioural and ecological studies Dryophthorinae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Curculionidae) de Colombia: lista de especies, distribución y taxones vegetales asociados Estado actual del conocimiento de los coleópteros acuáticos en Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1