Assessing the Structural Characteristics of the Japanese Version of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers

H. Nakamura-Thomas, M. Yamaguchi, I. Yamaguchi, Stacey E Rand
{"title":"Assessing the Structural Characteristics of the Japanese Version of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers","authors":"H. Nakamura-Thomas, M. Yamaguchi, I. Yamaguchi, Stacey E Rand","doi":"10.1177/10848223211030269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the absence of standardized Quality of Life (QoL) measures for informal family caregivers of recipients of long-term care (LTC) in Japan, translation and cross-cultural adapted LTC outcome measures are needed for research and evaluation. In this study, we assessed the validity and reliability of the factor structure and response system of the translated and cross-culturally adapted Japanese version of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carer (J-ASCOT-Carer). Participants were 872 informal family caregivers of adults who lived at home and required LTC services. Almost half (46%) of the participants were between 50 and 59 years old, 85% were employed, and 69% resided with their care recipients. We used the combined factor analysis and item response theory approach. Model fit indices included factor loading, path coefficients, root mean square error of approximation, standardized root mean square residual, and comparative fit index. This study confirmed the one factor structure that was identified in the original English version of the ASCOT-Carer. The values for the model fit indices indicated a good fit. Moreover, the validity and reliability of the response system were confirmed. Therefore, the J-ASCOT-Carer is a reliable assessment instrument to measure QoL of Japanese caregivers of adults requiring LTC.","PeriodicalId":45762,"journal":{"name":"Home Health Care Management and Practice","volume":"34 1","pages":"17 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10848223211030269","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Home Health Care Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10848223211030269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the absence of standardized Quality of Life (QoL) measures for informal family caregivers of recipients of long-term care (LTC) in Japan, translation and cross-cultural adapted LTC outcome measures are needed for research and evaluation. In this study, we assessed the validity and reliability of the factor structure and response system of the translated and cross-culturally adapted Japanese version of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carer (J-ASCOT-Carer). Participants were 872 informal family caregivers of adults who lived at home and required LTC services. Almost half (46%) of the participants were between 50 and 59 years old, 85% were employed, and 69% resided with their care recipients. We used the combined factor analysis and item response theory approach. Model fit indices included factor loading, path coefficients, root mean square error of approximation, standardized root mean square residual, and comparative fit index. This study confirmed the one factor structure that was identified in the original English version of the ASCOT-Carer. The values for the model fit indices indicated a good fit. Moreover, the validity and reliability of the response system were confirmed. Therefore, the J-ASCOT-Carer is a reliable assessment instrument to measure QoL of Japanese caregivers of adults requiring LTC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估日语版成人社会护理护理成果工具包的结构特征
由于日本长期护理(LTC)接受者的非正式家庭照顾者缺乏标准化的生活质量(QoL)衡量标准,因此需要翻译和跨文化适应的LTC结果衡量标准进行研究和评估。在这项研究中,我们评估了翻译和跨文化改编的日语版成人社会护理结果护理工具包(J-ASCOT-Carer)的因素结构和反应系统的有效性和可靠性。参与者是872名住在家中并需要长期护理服务的成年人的非正式家庭照顾者。近一半(46%)的参与者年龄在50岁至59岁之间 85%的人有工作,69%的人与他们的护理对象住在一起。我们采用了因素分析和项目反应理论相结合的方法。模型拟合指数包括因子负荷、路径系数、近似均方根误差、标准均方根残差和比较拟合指数。这项研究证实了ASCOT Carer英文原版中确定的单因素结构。模型拟合指数的值表明拟合良好。此外,验证了响应系统的有效性和可靠性。因此,J-ASCOT-Carer是一种可靠的评估工具,可以测量需要LTC的成年人的日本照顾者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Home Health Care Management & Practice is a comprehensive resource for clinicians, case managers, and administrators providing home and community based health care. Articles address diverse issues, ranging from individual patient care and case management to the human resource management and organizational operations management and administration of organizations and agencies. Regular columns focus on research, legal issues, psychosocial perspectives, accreditation and licensing, compliance, management, and cultural diversity. Specific topics include treatment, care and therapeutic techniques, cultural competence, family caregivers, equipment management, human resources, home health center.
期刊最新文献
Inter-Organizational Home Care Nursing Teams: A Comparison of a Region Wide Organizational Change Initiative With Success Factors Identified by Forerunners and Team Theory Is Palliative Care Cost-Effective? A Systematic Review of the Literature “They Are Lost Souls”: Medicare Home Care Nurses’ Perceptions of Medicare’s Inadequate Coverage of Homebound Persons With Alzheimer’s Disease An Online, Self-Report Version of the Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool (HOME FAST-SR) to Identify Fall-Related Hazards in the Homes of Older People The Effect on Home Caregivers of a Family Support Program Based on a Nurse-Led Case Management Model: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1