Clinical profile and outcome of recurrent infective endocarditis

R. Citro, K. Chan, M. Miglioranza, C. Laroche, R. Benvenga, S. Furnaz, J. Magne, C. Olmos, B. Paelinck, A. Pasquet, C. Piper, A. Salsano, A. Savouré, S. Park, P. Szymański, P. Tattevin, N. Vallejo Camazón, P. Lancellotti, G. Habib
{"title":"Clinical profile and outcome of recurrent infective endocarditis","authors":"R. Citro, K. Chan, M. Miglioranza, C. Laroche, R. Benvenga, S. Furnaz, J. Magne, C. Olmos, B. Paelinck, A. Pasquet, C. Piper, A. Salsano, A. Savouré, S. Park, P. Szymański, P. Tattevin, N. Vallejo Camazón, P. Lancellotti, G. Habib","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims Purpose of this study is to compare the clinical course and outcome of patients with recurrent versus first-episode infective endocarditis (IE). Methods Patients with recurrent and first-episode IE enrolled in the EUROpean ENDOcarditis (EURO-ENDO) registry including 156 centres were identified and compared using propensity score matching. Recurrent IE was classified as relapse when IE occurred ≤6 months after a previous episode or reinfection when IE occurred >6 months after the prior episode. Results 3106 patients were enrolled: 2839 (91.4%) patients with first-episode IE (mean age 59.4 (±18.1); 68.3% male) and 267 (8.6%) patients with recurrent IE (mean age 58.1 (±17.7); 74.9% male). Among patients with recurrent IE, 13.2% were intravenous drug users (IVDUs), 66.4% had a repaired or replaced valve with the tricuspid valve being more frequently involved compared with patients with first-episode IE (20.3% vs 14.1%; p=0.012). In patients with a first episode of IE, the aortic valve was more frequently involved (45.6% vs 39.5%; p=0.061). Recurrent relapse and reinfection were 20.6% and 79.4%, respectively. Staphylococcus aureus was the microorganism most frequently observed in both groups (p=0.207). There were no differences in in-hospital and post-hospitalisation mortality between recurrent and first-episode IE. In patients with recurrent IE, in-hospital mortality was higher in IVDU patients. Independent predictors of poorer in-hospital and 1-year outcome, including the occurrence of cardiogenic and septic shock, valvular disease severity and failure to undertake surgery when indicated, were similar for recurrent and first-episode IE. Conclusions In-hospital and 1-year mortality was similar in patients with recurrent and first-episode IE who shared similar predictors of poor outcome.","PeriodicalId":9311,"journal":{"name":"British Heart Journal","volume":"108 1","pages":"1729 - 1736"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Aims Purpose of this study is to compare the clinical course and outcome of patients with recurrent versus first-episode infective endocarditis (IE). Methods Patients with recurrent and first-episode IE enrolled in the EUROpean ENDOcarditis (EURO-ENDO) registry including 156 centres were identified and compared using propensity score matching. Recurrent IE was classified as relapse when IE occurred ≤6 months after a previous episode or reinfection when IE occurred >6 months after the prior episode. Results 3106 patients were enrolled: 2839 (91.4%) patients with first-episode IE (mean age 59.4 (±18.1); 68.3% male) and 267 (8.6%) patients with recurrent IE (mean age 58.1 (±17.7); 74.9% male). Among patients with recurrent IE, 13.2% were intravenous drug users (IVDUs), 66.4% had a repaired or replaced valve with the tricuspid valve being more frequently involved compared with patients with first-episode IE (20.3% vs 14.1%; p=0.012). In patients with a first episode of IE, the aortic valve was more frequently involved (45.6% vs 39.5%; p=0.061). Recurrent relapse and reinfection were 20.6% and 79.4%, respectively. Staphylococcus aureus was the microorganism most frequently observed in both groups (p=0.207). There were no differences in in-hospital and post-hospitalisation mortality between recurrent and first-episode IE. In patients with recurrent IE, in-hospital mortality was higher in IVDU patients. Independent predictors of poorer in-hospital and 1-year outcome, including the occurrence of cardiogenic and septic shock, valvular disease severity and failure to undertake surgery when indicated, were similar for recurrent and first-episode IE. Conclusions In-hospital and 1-year mortality was similar in patients with recurrent and first-episode IE who shared similar predictors of poor outcome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复发性感染性心内膜炎的临床特点和转归
本研究的目的是比较复发性和首次感染性心内膜炎(IE)患者的临床病程和结果。方法对纳入欧洲心内膜炎(EURO-ENDO)注册中心(包括156个中心)的复发性和首发IE患者进行识别,并使用倾向评分匹配进行比较。复发性IE在前一次发作后≤6个月发生时被归类为复发,或在前一事件发生后>6个月再次感染。结果3106例患者入选:2839例(91.4%)首次IE患者(平均年龄59.4(±18.1);68.3%为男性)和267例(8.6%)复发性IE患者(平均年龄58.1(±17.7);74.9%为男性)。在复发性IE患者中,13.2%的患者是静脉注射药物使用者(IVDU),66.4%的患者有修复或更换的瓣膜,与首次发作IE的患者相比,三尖瓣的受累频率更高(20.3%vs 14.1%;p=0.012),主动脉瓣受累率更高(45.6%vs39.5%;p=0.061),复发率和再次感染率分别为20.6%和79.4%。金黄色葡萄球菌是两组中最常见的微生物(p=0.207)。复发性IE和首次IE的住院和住院后死亡率没有差异。在复发性IE患者中,IVDU患者的住院死亡率更高。复发性IE和首次IE的住院和1年预后较差的独立预测因素相似,包括心源性和感染性休克的发生、瓣膜病的严重程度和手术失败。结论复发性IE患者和首次IE患者的住院和一年死亡率相似,其预后较差的预测因素相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A retrospective review of empiric acyclovir prescribing practices for suspected viral central nervous system infections: A single-centre study. Cortical Morphology in Cannabis Use Disorder: Implications for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment. Socioeconomic status and entrepreneurial networking responses to the COVID-19 crisis. Cardiac microstructural alterations measured by echocardiography identify sex-specific risk for heart failure. Aspirin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1