Differential white blood cell count predicting severity and mortality in patients with COVID-19

Sutravey Sesha Sai, K. Vishwa Vijeth, A. Hemalatha
{"title":"Differential white blood cell count predicting severity and mortality in patients with COVID-19","authors":"Sutravey Sesha Sai, K. Vishwa Vijeth, A. Hemalatha","doi":"10.4103/jacp.jacp_3_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the excessive inflammation is known to cause changes in blood parameters including differential white blood count and derived ratios such as neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and lymphocyte–monocyte ratio (LMR). Aim: To compare and analyze the association between differential white blood cell count and COVID-19 disease severity and mortality. Materials and methods: The study was a retrospective, observational study including 508 patients with confirmed COVID-19. Patients were divided into three groups based on severity. The laboratory parameters of all patients were collected and analyzed. Results: Among 508 patients, 75.6% were in mild, 9.1% were in moderate, and 15.4% were in severe categories. About 5.5% of the patients died during the treatment. The mean age of patients who got discharged was 42.47 ± 17.32 years and mean age of those who have died was 66.46 ± 14.37 years (P<0.001). When compared between all three groups and, between discharged and deceased, there were significant differences in mean neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, NLR, and LMR (P<0.001). Neutrophilia, lymphopenia, and monocytopenia were associated with severe disease and increased mortality. Basophil count had no association with severity and mortality. A receiver operating characteristic curve of NLR for severe patients (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.951) and for deceased patients (AUC: 0.952) showed the ratio is significantly accurate in predicting severity and mortality, while that of LMR showed inverse association with severity and mortality. Conclusion: In patients with COVID-19, advanced age, neutrophilia, lymphopenia, and monocytopenia are associated with increased severity and mortality. High NLR and low LMR can be used as a marker for predicting the severity of the disease and mortality.","PeriodicalId":30411,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians","volume":"9 1","pages":"59 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jacp.jacp_3_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the excessive inflammation is known to cause changes in blood parameters including differential white blood count and derived ratios such as neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and lymphocyte–monocyte ratio (LMR). Aim: To compare and analyze the association between differential white blood cell count and COVID-19 disease severity and mortality. Materials and methods: The study was a retrospective, observational study including 508 patients with confirmed COVID-19. Patients were divided into three groups based on severity. The laboratory parameters of all patients were collected and analyzed. Results: Among 508 patients, 75.6% were in mild, 9.1% were in moderate, and 15.4% were in severe categories. About 5.5% of the patients died during the treatment. The mean age of patients who got discharged was 42.47 ± 17.32 years and mean age of those who have died was 66.46 ± 14.37 years (P<0.001). When compared between all three groups and, between discharged and deceased, there were significant differences in mean neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, NLR, and LMR (P<0.001). Neutrophilia, lymphopenia, and monocytopenia were associated with severe disease and increased mortality. Basophil count had no association with severity and mortality. A receiver operating characteristic curve of NLR for severe patients (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.951) and for deceased patients (AUC: 0.952) showed the ratio is significantly accurate in predicting severity and mortality, while that of LMR showed inverse association with severity and mortality. Conclusion: In patients with COVID-19, advanced age, neutrophilia, lymphopenia, and monocytopenia are associated with increased severity and mortality. High NLR and low LMR can be used as a marker for predicting the severity of the disease and mortality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
差异白细胞计数预测新冠肺炎患者的严重程度和死亡率
背景:在2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)中,已知过度炎症会导致血液参数变化,包括白细胞计数差异和衍生比率,如中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和淋巴细胞-单核细胞比率(LMR)。目的:比较和分析差异性白细胞计数与新冠肺炎疾病严重程度和死亡率之间的关系。材料和方法:该研究是一项回顾性观察性研究,包括508名确诊的新冠肺炎患者。根据严重程度将患者分为三组。收集并分析所有患者的实验室参数。结果:508例患者中,轻度占75.6%,中度占9.1%,重度占15.4%。约5.5%的患者在治疗期间死亡。出院患者的平均年龄为42.47岁 ± 17.32岁,死亡者的平均年龄为66.46岁 ± 14.37岁(P<0.001)。当在所有三组之间以及出院和死亡之间进行比较时,中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞、单核细胞、NLR和LMR的平均值存在显著差异(P<001)。中性粒细胞减少症、淋巴细胞减少症和单核细胞减少症与严重疾病和死亡率增加有关。嗜碱性粒细胞计数与严重程度和死亡率无关。重症患者的NLR受试者工作特征曲线(曲线下面积AUC]:0.951)和死亡患者的NLRAUC:0.952)显示,该比率在预测严重程度和死亡率方面非常准确,而LMR的受试者操作特征曲线显示与严重程度和死亡呈负相关。结论:在新冠肺炎患者中,高龄、中性粒细胞增多症、淋巴细胞减少症和单核细胞减少症与严重程度和死亡率增加相关。高NLR和低LMR可作为预测疾病严重程度和死亡率的标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis with prognostic risk factors: A study in the hilly state of North India A radiolucent cystic lesion in a chest radiograph of a breathless child − a case report Persistent residual lung abnormalities as final outcome in recovered severe COVID-19 pneumonia with lung function abnormalities in spirometry: Pulmonologist and radiologist perspective Wegener’s granulomatosis versus pulmonary tuberculosis: a dilemma Carcinoid tumorlet/typical carcinoid of the lung: An incidental bronchoscopic finding and cytological dilemma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1