Overview of systematic toxicological analysis strategies and their coverage of substances in forensic toxicology

IF 3 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Analytical science advances Pub Date : 2023-04-15 DOI:10.1002/ansa.202200062
Karen Rygaard, Meiru Pan, Marie Katrine Klose Nielsen, Petur Weihe Dalsgaard, Brian Schou Rasmussen, Kristian Linnet
{"title":"Overview of systematic toxicological analysis strategies and their coverage of substances in forensic toxicology","authors":"Karen Rygaard,&nbsp;Meiru Pan,&nbsp;Marie Katrine Klose Nielsen,&nbsp;Petur Weihe Dalsgaard,&nbsp;Brian Schou Rasmussen,&nbsp;Kristian Linnet","doi":"10.1002/ansa.202200062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Systematic toxicological analysis (STA) is the process of using an adequate analytical methodology to detect and identify as many potentially toxicologically relevant compounds as possible in biological samples. STA is an important part of everyday routine work within forensic toxicology, and several methods for STA have frequently been published and reviewed independently. However, the many drugs and other substances involved, as well as the constant emergence of new ones, may pose a major challenge in STA, which often demands a strategy involving multiple analytical methods in parallel. Such strategies have been published and evaluated less frequently despite their relevance in forensic toxicology. This mini-review briefly summarizes commonly applied methods for STA in forensic toxicology, including gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography–MS (LC–MS) methods, and highlights some of their potential pitfalls. Second, it provides an overview of previously reported strategies to conduct STA, including a presentation of the STA strategy applied in the authors’ laboratory. This involves broad drug screening by LC–high-resolution MS, supported by targeted screening and quantification using LC–tandem MS, headspace (HS)-GC–MS, HS-GC–flame ionization detector and other complementary methods. The STA strategy aims to cover as many potentially relevant drugs as possible and seeks to reduce potential pitfalls arising in forensic casework. The review underlines that not every substance can be identified in all circumstances even with a comprehensive STA strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93411,"journal":{"name":"Analytical science advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ansa.202200062","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical science advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ansa.202200062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Systematic toxicological analysis (STA) is the process of using an adequate analytical methodology to detect and identify as many potentially toxicologically relevant compounds as possible in biological samples. STA is an important part of everyday routine work within forensic toxicology, and several methods for STA have frequently been published and reviewed independently. However, the many drugs and other substances involved, as well as the constant emergence of new ones, may pose a major challenge in STA, which often demands a strategy involving multiple analytical methods in parallel. Such strategies have been published and evaluated less frequently despite their relevance in forensic toxicology. This mini-review briefly summarizes commonly applied methods for STA in forensic toxicology, including gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography–MS (LC–MS) methods, and highlights some of their potential pitfalls. Second, it provides an overview of previously reported strategies to conduct STA, including a presentation of the STA strategy applied in the authors’ laboratory. This involves broad drug screening by LC–high-resolution MS, supported by targeted screening and quantification using LC–tandem MS, headspace (HS)-GC–MS, HS-GC–flame ionization detector and other complementary methods. The STA strategy aims to cover as many potentially relevant drugs as possible and seeks to reduce potential pitfalls arising in forensic casework. The review underlines that not every substance can be identified in all circumstances even with a comprehensive STA strategy.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统毒理学分析策略及其在法医毒理学中的应用综述
系统毒理学分析(STA)是使用适当的分析方法在生物样品中检测和鉴定尽可能多的潜在毒理学相关化合物的过程。STA是法医毒理学日常工作的重要组成部分,一些STA的方法经常被发表和独立审查。但是,所涉及的许多药物和其他物质以及新药物的不断出现可能对STA构成重大挑战,这往往需要一种涉及多种分析方法并行的战略。尽管这些战略在法医毒理学方面具有相关性,但它们发表和评价的频率较低。本文简要总结了法医毒理学中常用的STA方法,包括气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)和液相色谱-质谱(LC-MS)方法,并强调了它们的一些潜在缺陷。其次,它概述了先前报道的进行STA的策略,包括在作者实验室中应用的STA策略的介绍。这包括通过lc -高分辨率质谱进行广泛的药物筛选,并通过lc -串联质谱、顶空(HS) -GC-MS、HS- gc -火焰电离检测器和其他补充方法进行靶向筛选和定量。STA战略旨在涵盖尽可能多的可能相关的药物,并寻求减少法医案件工作中可能出现的陷阱。审查强调,即使采用全面的技术咨询服务战略,也不是在所有情况下都能查明每一种物质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of orange fruit peel extract concentration on the synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles Future worldwide coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic predictions by Gaidai multivariate risk evaluation method Application of a kosmotrope (Na2CO3) and chaotrope (NaCl) in chemometric optimization of aqueous two-phase extraction of bioactive compounds in Hypoxis iridifolia Challenges and recent advances in quantitative mass spectrometry-based metabolomics Targeted and untargeted metabolomics and lipidomics in dried blood microsampling: Recent applications and perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1