The manufacture and application of novel evaluating tool for renal vascular anatomy: the system of individualized reno-vasculature evaluation for nephrectomy

Dongwen Wang, Bin Zhang, Xiaobin Yuan, Xuhui Zhang, Caoyang Hu, Qiang Jing, Bowei Wu, Yanhong Luo
{"title":"The manufacture and application of novel evaluating tool for renal vascular anatomy: the system of individualized reno-vasculature evaluation for nephrectomy","authors":"Dongwen Wang, Bin Zhang, Xiaobin Yuan, Xuhui Zhang, Caoyang Hu, Qiang Jing, Bowei Wu, Yanhong Luo","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2019.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the clinical feasibility and effectiveness of novel preoperative evaluating tool to achieve accurate and quantitative evaluation of renal vascular anatomy for retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy (RLRN). \n \n \nMethods \nTwo-hundred and fifty one consecutive patients who underwent RLRN for renal tumours from September 2016 to March 2018 were enrolled prospectively, including 154 males (61.4%) and 97 females (38.6%), aged 26 to 84 years with the mean age of 58.7 and mean BMI of 25.8 kg/m2. The tumors were all isolated with the mean size of 5.4 cm. According to presence or absence of vascular correlation events (VCE) and nephrectomy times under endoscope (NTE), all the cases were divided into two groups: the common group (VCE, NTE <60 min) and the difficult group (no VCE, NTE ≥60 min). With the help of preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction, the specific and crucial arteriovenous anatomical features were recorded, which consist of side, count, spatial configuration and density of the vessel to be processed. After univariable analysis, multivariable analysis with logistic regression was performed for the selected risk factors. Individualized reno-vasculature evaluation for nephrectomy were established, when the value of risk factors were assigned separately according to its correlation and clinical practice. \n \n \nResults \nThere was no statistical significance between common group and difficult group in the aspects of gender, age, BMI, maximum diameter of the tumor, R. E.N.A.L. score and PADUA score. There were statistical significance between common group and difficult group in the aspects of N (number of total vessels), D (vascular anomalies density), C (3D conformation), S (sides) of pending renal vessels (χ2=125.700, 102.014, 97.090, 12.603, P 0.05). SIREN was preliminarily established as a preoperative evaluating tool to achieve accurate and quantitative evaluation of renal vascular anatomy. Of the 5 components of SIREN, N, D were scored on 1 to 3 points, C was scored on 0 to 3 points, E was scored on 0 to 1 point, and S was not scored but showed in terms of L or R. All of these constitute the assessment content with a full score of 10 points except S suffixed by L or R instead of scores. There was a statistically significant difference during low (2-3 points), middle (4-6 points), and high (7-10 points) groups (χ2=126.927, P<0.05) according to the comparisons between low and middle, low and high, as well as middle and high (χ2=90.997, 7.195, 91.679, P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nIn virtue of the renal vascular scoring system named after SIREN by 3d reconstructing, the spatial structure information of the renal vascular system can be obtained accurately and expressed directly before operation, the difficulty of vascular treatment can be predicted, the preoperative planning can be optimized, and the accurate quantitative evaluation of renal vascular anatomical structure can be achieved to further improve the surgical safety and efficiency. \n \n \nKey words: \nLaparoscope; Nephrectomy; Influence factor; Renal vascular; Scoring standard","PeriodicalId":10343,"journal":{"name":"中华泌尿外科杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华泌尿外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2019.10.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To explore the clinical feasibility and effectiveness of novel preoperative evaluating tool to achieve accurate and quantitative evaluation of renal vascular anatomy for retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy (RLRN). Methods Two-hundred and fifty one consecutive patients who underwent RLRN for renal tumours from September 2016 to March 2018 were enrolled prospectively, including 154 males (61.4%) and 97 females (38.6%), aged 26 to 84 years with the mean age of 58.7 and mean BMI of 25.8 kg/m2. The tumors were all isolated with the mean size of 5.4 cm. According to presence or absence of vascular correlation events (VCE) and nephrectomy times under endoscope (NTE), all the cases were divided into two groups: the common group (VCE, NTE <60 min) and the difficult group (no VCE, NTE ≥60 min). With the help of preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction, the specific and crucial arteriovenous anatomical features were recorded, which consist of side, count, spatial configuration and density of the vessel to be processed. After univariable analysis, multivariable analysis with logistic regression was performed for the selected risk factors. Individualized reno-vasculature evaluation for nephrectomy were established, when the value of risk factors were assigned separately according to its correlation and clinical practice. Results There was no statistical significance between common group and difficult group in the aspects of gender, age, BMI, maximum diameter of the tumor, R. E.N.A.L. score and PADUA score. There were statistical significance between common group and difficult group in the aspects of N (number of total vessels), D (vascular anomalies density), C (3D conformation), S (sides) of pending renal vessels (χ2=125.700, 102.014, 97.090, 12.603, P 0.05). SIREN was preliminarily established as a preoperative evaluating tool to achieve accurate and quantitative evaluation of renal vascular anatomy. Of the 5 components of SIREN, N, D were scored on 1 to 3 points, C was scored on 0 to 3 points, E was scored on 0 to 1 point, and S was not scored but showed in terms of L or R. All of these constitute the assessment content with a full score of 10 points except S suffixed by L or R instead of scores. There was a statistically significant difference during low (2-3 points), middle (4-6 points), and high (7-10 points) groups (χ2=126.927, P<0.05) according to the comparisons between low and middle, low and high, as well as middle and high (χ2=90.997, 7.195, 91.679, P<0.05). Conclusions In virtue of the renal vascular scoring system named after SIREN by 3d reconstructing, the spatial structure information of the renal vascular system can be obtained accurately and expressed directly before operation, the difficulty of vascular treatment can be predicted, the preoperative planning can be optimized, and the accurate quantitative evaluation of renal vascular anatomical structure can be achieved to further improve the surgical safety and efficiency. Key words: Laparoscope; Nephrectomy; Influence factor; Renal vascular; Scoring standard
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型肾血管解剖评估工具的研制与应用:肾切除术肾血管系统个体化评估系统
目的探讨一种新的术前评估工具对后腹腔镜根治性肾切除术(RLRN)肾血管解剖结构进行准确、定量评估的临床可行性和有效性。方法前瞻性纳入2016年9月至2018年3月连续251例肾肿瘤RLRN患者,其中男性154例(61.4%),女性97例(38.6%),年龄26至84岁,平均年龄58.7岁,平均BMI 25.8 kg/m2。根据是否存在血管相关事件(VCE)和内窥镜下肾切除术次数(NTE),将所有病例分为两组:普通组(VCE,NTE<60min)和困难组(无VCE,NTE≥60min)。在术前三维重建的帮助下,记录了特定和关键的动静脉解剖特征,包括待处理血管的侧面、数量、空间结构和密度。在单变量分析后,对所选的风险因素进行多变量逻辑回归分析。当根据其相关性和临床实践分别分配危险因素的价值时,建立了肾切除术的个性化肾血管系统评估。结果普通组和难治组在性别、年龄、BMI、肿瘤最大直径、R.E.N.A.L.评分和PADUA评分方面无统计学意义。普通组和困难组在N(总血管数)、D(血管异常密度)、C(三维构象)、,S(侧)(χ2=125.700,102.014,97.090,12.603,P 0.05)。初步建立SIREN作为术前评估工具,实现对肾血管解剖结构的准确、定量评估。SIREN的5个组成部分中,N、D分为1-3分,C分为0-3分,E分为0-1分,S不得分,但以L或R表示。所有这些都构成了满分10分的评估内容,但S以L或R代替分数。根据低与中、低与高、中与高的比较,低组(2-3分)、中组(4-6分)和高组(7-10分)之间差异有统计学意义(χ2=126.927,P<0.05)(χ2=90.997,7.195,91.679,P<0.05),可以在手术前准确获取并直接表达肾血管系统的空间结构信息,预测血管治疗的难度,优化术前计划,实现对肾血管解剖结构的准确定量评估,进一步提高手术的安全性和效率。关键词:腹腔镜;肾切除术;影响因素;肾血管;评分标准
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华泌尿外科杂志
中华泌尿外科杂志 Medicine-Nephrology
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14180
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Urology (monthly) was founded in 1980. It is a publicly issued academic journal supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology and sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association. It mainly publishes original research papers, reviews and comments in this field. This journal mainly reports on the latest scientific research results and clinical diagnosis and treatment experience in the professional field of urology at home and abroad, as well as basic theoretical research results closely related to clinical practice. The journal has columns such as treatises, abstracts of treatises, experimental studies, case reports, experience exchanges, reviews, reviews, lectures, etc. Chinese Journal of Urology has been included in well-known databases such as Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), CSCD Chinese Science Citation Database Source Journal (including extended version), and also included in American Chemical Abstracts (CA). The journal has been rated as a quality journal by the Association for Science and Technology and as an excellent journal by the Chinese Medical Association.
期刊最新文献
Clinical application of different bladder neck separation techniques in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Analysis of risk factors for acute kidney injury after radical nephrectomy Characteristics of urinary microflora in women with type 2 diabetic peripheral neuropathy without lower urinary tract symptoms A case report of primary leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord Establishment and validation of nomogram for positive surgical margin of prostate cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1