The manufacture and application of novel evaluating tool for renal vascular anatomy: the system of individualized reno-vasculature evaluation for nephrectomy
Dongwen Wang, Bin Zhang, Xiaobin Yuan, Xuhui Zhang, Caoyang Hu, Qiang Jing, Bowei Wu, Yanhong Luo
{"title":"The manufacture and application of novel evaluating tool for renal vascular anatomy: the system of individualized reno-vasculature evaluation for nephrectomy","authors":"Dongwen Wang, Bin Zhang, Xiaobin Yuan, Xuhui Zhang, Caoyang Hu, Qiang Jing, Bowei Wu, Yanhong Luo","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2019.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the clinical feasibility and effectiveness of novel preoperative evaluating tool to achieve accurate and quantitative evaluation of renal vascular anatomy for retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy (RLRN). \n \n \nMethods \nTwo-hundred and fifty one consecutive patients who underwent RLRN for renal tumours from September 2016 to March 2018 were enrolled prospectively, including 154 males (61.4%) and 97 females (38.6%), aged 26 to 84 years with the mean age of 58.7 and mean BMI of 25.8 kg/m2. The tumors were all isolated with the mean size of 5.4 cm. According to presence or absence of vascular correlation events (VCE) and nephrectomy times under endoscope (NTE), all the cases were divided into two groups: the common group (VCE, NTE <60 min) and the difficult group (no VCE, NTE ≥60 min). With the help of preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction, the specific and crucial arteriovenous anatomical features were recorded, which consist of side, count, spatial configuration and density of the vessel to be processed. After univariable analysis, multivariable analysis with logistic regression was performed for the selected risk factors. Individualized reno-vasculature evaluation for nephrectomy were established, when the value of risk factors were assigned separately according to its correlation and clinical practice. \n \n \nResults \nThere was no statistical significance between common group and difficult group in the aspects of gender, age, BMI, maximum diameter of the tumor, R. E.N.A.L. score and PADUA score. There were statistical significance between common group and difficult group in the aspects of N (number of total vessels), D (vascular anomalies density), C (3D conformation), S (sides) of pending renal vessels (χ2=125.700, 102.014, 97.090, 12.603, P 0.05). SIREN was preliminarily established as a preoperative evaluating tool to achieve accurate and quantitative evaluation of renal vascular anatomy. Of the 5 components of SIREN, N, D were scored on 1 to 3 points, C was scored on 0 to 3 points, E was scored on 0 to 1 point, and S was not scored but showed in terms of L or R. All of these constitute the assessment content with a full score of 10 points except S suffixed by L or R instead of scores. There was a statistically significant difference during low (2-3 points), middle (4-6 points), and high (7-10 points) groups (χ2=126.927, P<0.05) according to the comparisons between low and middle, low and high, as well as middle and high (χ2=90.997, 7.195, 91.679, P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nIn virtue of the renal vascular scoring system named after SIREN by 3d reconstructing, the spatial structure information of the renal vascular system can be obtained accurately and expressed directly before operation, the difficulty of vascular treatment can be predicted, the preoperative planning can be optimized, and the accurate quantitative evaluation of renal vascular anatomical structure can be achieved to further improve the surgical safety and efficiency. \n \n \nKey words: \nLaparoscope; Nephrectomy; Influence factor; Renal vascular; Scoring standard","PeriodicalId":10343,"journal":{"name":"中华泌尿外科杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华泌尿外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2019.10.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To explore the clinical feasibility and effectiveness of novel preoperative evaluating tool to achieve accurate and quantitative evaluation of renal vascular anatomy for retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy (RLRN).
Methods
Two-hundred and fifty one consecutive patients who underwent RLRN for renal tumours from September 2016 to March 2018 were enrolled prospectively, including 154 males (61.4%) and 97 females (38.6%), aged 26 to 84 years with the mean age of 58.7 and mean BMI of 25.8 kg/m2. The tumors were all isolated with the mean size of 5.4 cm. According to presence or absence of vascular correlation events (VCE) and nephrectomy times under endoscope (NTE), all the cases were divided into two groups: the common group (VCE, NTE <60 min) and the difficult group (no VCE, NTE ≥60 min). With the help of preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction, the specific and crucial arteriovenous anatomical features were recorded, which consist of side, count, spatial configuration and density of the vessel to be processed. After univariable analysis, multivariable analysis with logistic regression was performed for the selected risk factors. Individualized reno-vasculature evaluation for nephrectomy were established, when the value of risk factors were assigned separately according to its correlation and clinical practice.
Results
There was no statistical significance between common group and difficult group in the aspects of gender, age, BMI, maximum diameter of the tumor, R. E.N.A.L. score and PADUA score. There were statistical significance between common group and difficult group in the aspects of N (number of total vessels), D (vascular anomalies density), C (3D conformation), S (sides) of pending renal vessels (χ2=125.700, 102.014, 97.090, 12.603, P 0.05). SIREN was preliminarily established as a preoperative evaluating tool to achieve accurate and quantitative evaluation of renal vascular anatomy. Of the 5 components of SIREN, N, D were scored on 1 to 3 points, C was scored on 0 to 3 points, E was scored on 0 to 1 point, and S was not scored but showed in terms of L or R. All of these constitute the assessment content with a full score of 10 points except S suffixed by L or R instead of scores. There was a statistically significant difference during low (2-3 points), middle (4-6 points), and high (7-10 points) groups (χ2=126.927, P<0.05) according to the comparisons between low and middle, low and high, as well as middle and high (χ2=90.997, 7.195, 91.679, P<0.05).
Conclusions
In virtue of the renal vascular scoring system named after SIREN by 3d reconstructing, the spatial structure information of the renal vascular system can be obtained accurately and expressed directly before operation, the difficulty of vascular treatment can be predicted, the preoperative planning can be optimized, and the accurate quantitative evaluation of renal vascular anatomical structure can be achieved to further improve the surgical safety and efficiency.
Key words:
Laparoscope; Nephrectomy; Influence factor; Renal vascular; Scoring standard
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Urology (monthly) was founded in 1980. It is a publicly issued academic journal supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology and sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association. It mainly publishes original research papers, reviews and comments in this field. This journal mainly reports on the latest scientific research results and clinical diagnosis and treatment experience in the professional field of urology at home and abroad, as well as basic theoretical research results closely related to clinical practice.
The journal has columns such as treatises, abstracts of treatises, experimental studies, case reports, experience exchanges, reviews, reviews, lectures, etc.
Chinese Journal of Urology has been included in well-known databases such as Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), CSCD Chinese Science Citation Database Source Journal (including extended version), and also included in American Chemical Abstracts (CA). The journal has been rated as a quality journal by the Association for Science and Technology and as an excellent journal by the Chinese Medical Association.