Aedes Mosquito Control and Surveillance in the Pacific

L. Anderson, F. Sopoaga, Susan Jack
{"title":"Aedes Mosquito Control and Surveillance in the Pacific","authors":"L. Anderson, F. Sopoaga, Susan Jack","doi":"10.26635/phd.2020.623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Mosquitoes of the genus Aedes transmit dengue, Zika and chikungunya viruses, and the incidence of these diseases is increasing in the Pacific. This can be attributed to increased movement of people and goods, unplanned urbanisation, and global warming, among other factors. As vaccines are unavailable, we rely on vector control programs to prevent disease transmission. This study aimed to evaluate current practice in vector control and surveillance in 10 Pacific Island countries and identify evidence-based vector control interventions and surveillance methods for use in these countries. Methods: This study was conducted in preparation for TechCamp New Zealand, 24-26 January 2018, which aimed to work with stakeholders from 10 Pacific nations to reduce the spread of vector-borne diseases in the region. We conducted a literature review of published reviews and meta-analyses evaluating Aedes control and surveillance to find methods appropriate for use in Pacific Island countries. We collected information regarding current Aedes mosquito control and surveillance practice in 10 Pacific countries from TechCamp participants, through a survey, presentation and interview. Findings: Combinations of vector control interventions, applied appropriately, can prevent disease transmission. Although such programs exist in the Pacific, some interventions do not currently follow best practice. Key barriers to implementing evidence-based practice include lack of targeted education, internet and network coverage, personnel and expertise. Conclusions: Future goals for the region include the adaptation of current practice to evidence-based practice, and the development of vector and risk factor surveillance for targeted mosquito control. New developments should be sustainable and not reliant on internet or network real-time coverage. Education should be targeted to local communities to maximise community participation.","PeriodicalId":82251,"journal":{"name":"Pacific health dialog","volume":"21 1","pages":"226-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific health dialog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/phd.2020.623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Mosquitoes of the genus Aedes transmit dengue, Zika and chikungunya viruses, and the incidence of these diseases is increasing in the Pacific. This can be attributed to increased movement of people and goods, unplanned urbanisation, and global warming, among other factors. As vaccines are unavailable, we rely on vector control programs to prevent disease transmission. This study aimed to evaluate current practice in vector control and surveillance in 10 Pacific Island countries and identify evidence-based vector control interventions and surveillance methods for use in these countries. Methods: This study was conducted in preparation for TechCamp New Zealand, 24-26 January 2018, which aimed to work with stakeholders from 10 Pacific nations to reduce the spread of vector-borne diseases in the region. We conducted a literature review of published reviews and meta-analyses evaluating Aedes control and surveillance to find methods appropriate for use in Pacific Island countries. We collected information regarding current Aedes mosquito control and surveillance practice in 10 Pacific countries from TechCamp participants, through a survey, presentation and interview. Findings: Combinations of vector control interventions, applied appropriately, can prevent disease transmission. Although such programs exist in the Pacific, some interventions do not currently follow best practice. Key barriers to implementing evidence-based practice include lack of targeted education, internet and network coverage, personnel and expertise. Conclusions: Future goals for the region include the adaptation of current practice to evidence-based practice, and the development of vector and risk factor surveillance for targeted mosquito control. New developments should be sustainable and not reliant on internet or network real-time coverage. Education should be targeted to local communities to maximise community participation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
太平洋地区的伊蚊控制和监测
简介:伊蚊属蚊子传播登革热、寨卡病毒和基孔肯雅病毒,这些疾病在太平洋地区的发病率正在增加。这可归因于人员和货物流动的增加、无计划的城市化和全球变暖等因素。由于无法获得疫苗,我们依靠病媒控制计划来预防疾病传播。本研究旨在评估10个太平洋岛屿国家目前在病媒控制和监测方面的做法,并确定在这些国家使用的循证病媒控制干预措施和监测方法。方法:这项研究是为2018年1月24日至26日的新西兰科技营做准备而进行的,旨在与来自10个太平洋国家的利益相关者合作,减少媒介传播疾病在该地区的传播。我们对已发表的评估伊蚊控制和监测的综述和荟萃分析进行了文献综述,以找到适合太平洋岛国使用的方法。我们通过调查、介绍和访谈,从TechCamp的参与者那里收集了关于10个太平洋国家当前伊蚊控制和监测实践的信息。研究结果:病媒控制干预措施的组合,适当应用,可以预防疾病传播。尽管太平洋地区存在此类项目,但一些干预措施目前没有遵循最佳做法。实施循证实践的主要障碍包括缺乏有针对性的教育、互联网和网络覆盖、人员和专业知识。结论:该地区未来的目标包括使目前的做法适应循证做法,以及发展病媒和风险因素监测,以有针对性地控制蚊子。新的发展应该是可持续的,而不是依赖于互联网或网络的实时覆盖。教育应针对当地社区,以最大限度地提高社区参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital health and Universal Health Coverage: Opportunities and policy considerations for low- and middle-income Pacific Island countries and territories Increased Reports of Depression in Hawaiʻi during the first wave of COVID-19 Traditional kava use and body sway: A pilot investigation Impacts of religious faith on the mental wellbeing of young, multi-ethnic Pacific women in Aotearoa Examining case complexity among Pasifika with autism/Takiwātanga in Aotearoa New Zealand: a national cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1