Directionality challenges for transformative innovation policy: lessons from implementing climate goals in the process industry

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Industry and Innovation Pub Date : 2023-01-11 DOI:10.1080/13662716.2022.2163882
Anna Bergek, Hans Hellsmark, K. Karltorp
{"title":"Directionality challenges for transformative innovation policy: lessons from implementing climate goals in the process industry","authors":"Anna Bergek, Hans Hellsmark, K. Karltorp","doi":"10.1080/13662716.2022.2163882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the new paradigm of ‘transformative’ or ‘mission-oriented’ innovation policy, which addresses broad societal challenges, policy makers are given a large responsibility for setting or shaping the direction of socio-technical transitions. However, the literature has so far not provided much concrete advice on how to achieve directionality in practice. The main argument of this conceptual article is that a more detailed approach is needed to better understand the challenges policy makers might face when they attempt to translate societal goals into more concrete and actionable policy agendas. It identifies and discusses eight analytically derived directionality challenges: handling goal conflicts, defining system boundaries, identifying realistic pathways, formulating strategies, realising destabilisation, mobilising relevant policy domains, identifying target groups, and accessing intervention points. To illustrate these challenges, the article uses examples from the implementation of the Swedish climate goal in the process industry.","PeriodicalId":13585,"journal":{"name":"Industry and Innovation","volume":"30 1","pages":"1110 - 1139"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industry and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2022.2163882","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the new paradigm of ‘transformative’ or ‘mission-oriented’ innovation policy, which addresses broad societal challenges, policy makers are given a large responsibility for setting or shaping the direction of socio-technical transitions. However, the literature has so far not provided much concrete advice on how to achieve directionality in practice. The main argument of this conceptual article is that a more detailed approach is needed to better understand the challenges policy makers might face when they attempt to translate societal goals into more concrete and actionable policy agendas. It identifies and discusses eight analytically derived directionality challenges: handling goal conflicts, defining system boundaries, identifying realistic pathways, formulating strategies, realising destabilisation, mobilising relevant policy domains, identifying target groups, and accessing intervention points. To illustrate these challenges, the article uses examples from the implementation of the Swedish climate goal in the process industry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
变革性创新政策的方向性挑战:流程行业实施气候目标的经验教训
摘要在应对广泛社会挑战的“变革性”或“使命导向”创新政策的新范式中,决策者被赋予了设定或塑造社会技术转型方向的重大责任。然而,到目前为止,关于如何在实践中实现方向性,文献并没有提供太多具体的建议。这篇概念性文章的主要论点是,需要一种更详细的方法来更好地理解决策者在试图将社会目标转化为更具体和可操作的政策议程时可能面临的挑战。它确定并讨论了八个分析衍生的方向性挑战:处理目标冲突、定义系统边界、确定现实途径、制定战略、实现不稳定、动员相关政策领域、确定目标群体和获取干预点。为了说明这些挑战,本文使用了瑞典气候目标在加工业中实施的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Industry and Innovation is an international refereed journal presenting high-quality original scholarship of the dynamics of industries and innovation. Interdisciplinary in nature, Industry and Innovation is informed by, and contributes in turn to, advancing the theoretical frontier within economics, organization theory, and economic geography. Theoretical issues encompass: •What are the institutional underpinnings for different organizational forms? •How are different industrial structures and institutions related to innovation patterns and economic performance?
期刊最新文献
Exploring the nexus of organisational culture and sustainability for green innovation The emergence of new regional technological specialisations: exploring the role of organisations and their technological network structure Partnering with green start-ups: a vehicle for eco-innovation? R&D policy instrument mix sequencing: evaluating the impact of receiving R&D grants and R&D tax credits over time on firm-level R&D Firms’ patenting and collective cumulative knowledge: evidence from the largest R&D investors in the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1