The Labarum – from Crux Dissimulata and Chi-Rho to the Open Image Cross

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Studia Ceranea Pub Date : 2020-12-23 DOI:10.18778/2084-140x.10.11
S. Bralewski
{"title":"The Labarum – from Crux Dissimulata and Chi-Rho to the Open Image Cross","authors":"S. Bralewski","doi":"10.18778/2084-140x.10.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the testimony of emperor Constantine the Great himself, Eusebius of Caesarea presented a labarum in the form of crux dissimulata crowned with the Chi-Rho. The continuers of his Church History in the next century, Rufinus of Aquileia, Philostorgius, Socrates of Constantinople, and Sozomen, only kept the cross-shape of the banner, excluding the christogram. This might have happened because in two main sources informing about the vision of Constantine – the accounts of Eusebius of Caesarea and Lactantius – it was not only the monogram of Christ that played a significant role. The motif of the cross also appears in them, in the account of Eusebius directly, and Lactantius indirectly. Furthermore, Christians interpreted the cross explicitly as a sign of victory. Eusebius wrote about the cross as a symbol of immortality, a triumphant sign of Christ overcoming death. In the account of the bishop of Caesarea, on the other hand, Constantine’s supposed vision included a triumphal sign in the form of a luminous cross, or the symbol of the trophy of salvation. Numismatic evidence also cannot be ignored. Already during the reign of Constantine the Great, the Chi-Rho appeared on the coins both on the shields and on the labarum. However, starting from the reign of Constantius II, coins that were minted included the cross instead of the Chi-Rho on the labarum. It also began to be placed on the shields, in their central part, where the monogram of Christ used to be. Over time, the cross replaced the entire labarum. The iconography present on the coins may prove that the phenomenon of identifying the labarum or Chi-Rho with the cross was not limited to church historiography and was more widespread, although it should be remembered that coins continued to also be decorated with the letters Chi-Rho. Therefore, the representation of the cross did not replace this symbol. However, it cannot be ruled out that the increasingly common image of the cross on coins also contributed to the aforementioned perception of the labarum by church historians.","PeriodicalId":40873,"journal":{"name":"Studia Ceranea","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Ceranea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140x.10.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the testimony of emperor Constantine the Great himself, Eusebius of Caesarea presented a labarum in the form of crux dissimulata crowned with the Chi-Rho. The continuers of his Church History in the next century, Rufinus of Aquileia, Philostorgius, Socrates of Constantinople, and Sozomen, only kept the cross-shape of the banner, excluding the christogram. This might have happened because in two main sources informing about the vision of Constantine – the accounts of Eusebius of Caesarea and Lactantius – it was not only the monogram of Christ that played a significant role. The motif of the cross also appears in them, in the account of Eusebius directly, and Lactantius indirectly. Furthermore, Christians interpreted the cross explicitly as a sign of victory. Eusebius wrote about the cross as a symbol of immortality, a triumphant sign of Christ overcoming death. In the account of the bishop of Caesarea, on the other hand, Constantine’s supposed vision included a triumphal sign in the form of a luminous cross, or the symbol of the trophy of salvation. Numismatic evidence also cannot be ignored. Already during the reign of Constantine the Great, the Chi-Rho appeared on the coins both on the shields and on the labarum. However, starting from the reign of Constantius II, coins that were minted included the cross instead of the Chi-Rho on the labarum. It also began to be placed on the shields, in their central part, where the monogram of Christ used to be. Over time, the cross replaced the entire labarum. The iconography present on the coins may prove that the phenomenon of identifying the labarum or Chi-Rho with the cross was not limited to church historiography and was more widespread, although it should be remembered that coins continued to also be decorated with the letters Chi-Rho. Therefore, the representation of the cross did not replace this symbol. However, it cannot be ruled out that the increasingly common image of the cross on coins also contributed to the aforementioned perception of the labarum by church historians.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Labarum——从Crux Dissimulata和Chi Rho到Open Image Cross
根据君士坦丁大帝本人的证词,该撒利亚的尤西比乌斯以十字架的形式献上了一只拉布鲁姆,上面戴着奇罗。他在下个世纪的教会史上的继承人,阿奎莱亚的鲁菲努斯、菲洛斯托吉乌斯、君士坦丁堡的苏格拉底和索佐门,只保留了横幅的十字架形状,不包括基督图案。之所以会发生这种情况,是因为在关于君士坦丁愿景的两个主要来源中——凯撒利亚的尤西比乌斯和拉坦提乌斯的记述——不仅基督的花押字发挥了重要作用。十字架的图案也出现在它们身上,直接由尤西比乌斯和拉坦提斯记载。此外,基督徒明确地将十字架解释为胜利的象征。尤西比乌把十字架写为不朽的象征,是基督战胜死亡的胜利标志。另一方面,在凯撒利亚主教的描述中,君士坦丁的设想愿景包括一个发光十字架形式的凯旋标志,或救赎奖杯的象征。钱币证据也不容忽视。早在君士坦丁大帝统治期间,奇罗就出现在盾牌和拉布鲁姆的硬币上。然而,从君士坦提乌斯二世统治时期开始,铸造的硬币包括十字架,而不是拉布鲁姆上的Chi Rho。它也开始被放置在盾牌的中心部分,那里曾经是基督的花押字。随着时间的推移,十字架取代了整个拉布鲁姆。硬币上的图像可能证明,用十字架识别labarum或Chi Rho的现象不仅限于教会史学,而且更为普遍,尽管应该记住的是,硬币上仍然装饰着字母Chi Rho-。因此,十字架的表示并没有取代这个符号。然而,不能排除的是,硬币上越来越常见的十字架图像也促成了教会历史学家对labarum的上述看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Ceranea
Studia Ceranea HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Hymnography in Honour of Saints Constantine and Helena and its Connection with Imperial Ideology The Jewish Theme in Theophanes the Confessor’s Testimony on the Prophet Muḥammad Justinian, Pilgrimages and the Theotokos: Imperial Propaganda in De Aedificiis V Basil I’s Path to Power according to the Vita Basilii as a Heroic Myth Representing the Phlegm: the Portrait of the Phlegmatic in Cesare Ripa’s Iconology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1