Frequent Agonistic Interactions among Arboreal Birds in Savannahs But Not in Humid Forests of Africa

Pub Date : 2023-07-05 DOI:10.5253/arde.2022.a30
L. Zwarts, R. Bijlsma, Jan van der Kamp
{"title":"Frequent Agonistic Interactions among Arboreal Birds in Savannahs But Not in Humid Forests of Africa","authors":"L. Zwarts, R. Bijlsma, Jan van der Kamp","doi":"10.5253/arde.2022.a30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arboreal birds in the Sahel are highly selective in their tree choice. Most migrant, but also resident, birds are found in a few tree species and within those species often only in trees with abundant leaves and flowers. For this reason alone, preferred trees were expected to teem with birds. This was not the case. Most bird species were present in trees as singletons, even half of the Senegal Eremomela Eremomela pusilla – the most social species of all – were recorded as solitary birds. The probability that two different bird species were in the same tree was also very small, 2.8% on average. Mixed-group foraging flocks of arboreal birds, as so often reported for tropical forests, did not occur in the Sahel. Perhaps birds forage singly because they have no need to fear the raptors that are common in the forests further south. Some species, such as European Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca and Common Redstart Phoenicurus phoenicurus, defend winter territories, but for other species individual home ranges show overlap. In the humid forests further south, and among resident species in the Sahel, few agonistic interactions were seen, but migratory birds were often agonistic with congeners and even more frequently with birds of other species. Larger bird species usually won agonistic interactions, but Western Olivaceous Warblers Iduna opaca chased off birds twice their own body size. Subalpine Warbler Curruca iberiae + subalpina + cantillans and other Curruca species, with the exception of Lesser Whitethroat Curruca curruca, were also intolerant. Western Bonelli's Warblers Phylloscopus bonelli, and during migration also Willow Warblers Phylloscopus trochilus, were most often on the receiving end of agonistic interactions. Far fewer agonistic interactions were recorded in the more humid regions to the south of the Sahel. This disparity may hinge on the higher intra- and interspecific encounter rate in the Sahel, where a greater fraction of trees are occupied by birds, than in the humid forests.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5253/arde.2022.a30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Arboreal birds in the Sahel are highly selective in their tree choice. Most migrant, but also resident, birds are found in a few tree species and within those species often only in trees with abundant leaves and flowers. For this reason alone, preferred trees were expected to teem with birds. This was not the case. Most bird species were present in trees as singletons, even half of the Senegal Eremomela Eremomela pusilla – the most social species of all – were recorded as solitary birds. The probability that two different bird species were in the same tree was also very small, 2.8% on average. Mixed-group foraging flocks of arboreal birds, as so often reported for tropical forests, did not occur in the Sahel. Perhaps birds forage singly because they have no need to fear the raptors that are common in the forests further south. Some species, such as European Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca and Common Redstart Phoenicurus phoenicurus, defend winter territories, but for other species individual home ranges show overlap. In the humid forests further south, and among resident species in the Sahel, few agonistic interactions were seen, but migratory birds were often agonistic with congeners and even more frequently with birds of other species. Larger bird species usually won agonistic interactions, but Western Olivaceous Warblers Iduna opaca chased off birds twice their own body size. Subalpine Warbler Curruca iberiae + subalpina + cantillans and other Curruca species, with the exception of Lesser Whitethroat Curruca curruca, were also intolerant. Western Bonelli's Warblers Phylloscopus bonelli, and during migration also Willow Warblers Phylloscopus trochilus, were most often on the receiving end of agonistic interactions. Far fewer agonistic interactions were recorded in the more humid regions to the south of the Sahel. This disparity may hinge on the higher intra- and interspecific encounter rate in the Sahel, where a greater fraction of trees are occupied by birds, than in the humid forests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
热带草原但非洲潮湿森林中的乔木鸟类之间频繁的激动性相互作用
萨赫勒地区的乔木鸟类在选择树木时具有高度的选择性。大多数迁徙的鸟类,但也是定居的鸟类,都存在于少数几个树种中,而在这些树种中,通常只存在于树叶和花朵丰富的树木中。仅仅因为这个原因,人们就期望人们喜欢的树上长满了鸟。事实并非如此。大多数鸟类以单身鸟的形式出现在树上,甚至塞内加尔的Eremomela Eremomel pusila——所有物种中最具社会性的物种——也有一半被记录为单身鸟。两种不同的鸟类在同一棵树上的概率也很小,平均为2.8%。萨赫勒地区没有出现热带森林中经常报道的混合群觅食的树栖鸟类。也许鸟类单独觅食是因为它们不需要害怕在更南边的森林中常见的猛禽。一些物种,如欧洲派捕蝇草(Ficedula hypoleuca)和普通红尾鹬(Common Redstart Phoenicurus Phoenicurus),保卫冬季领地,但对于其他物种,个体的栖息地范围显示出重叠。在更南部的潮湿森林中,在萨赫勒地区的居民物种中,很少看到令人痛苦的相互作用,但候鸟经常与同类鸟类发生痛苦,甚至更频繁地与其他物种的鸟类发生痛苦。体型较大的鸟类通常会赢得激烈的互动,但西部橄榄莺Iduna opaca会赶走体型是自己两倍的鸟类。亚高山莺(Curruca iberiae+subalpina+cantilans)和除小白喉Curruca Curruca外的其他Curruca物种也不耐受。Western Bonelli的Warblers Phyllocopus Bonelli,以及迁徙期间的Willow Warblers phyllocopus trocilus,最常处于痛苦相互作用的接收端。萨赫勒以南更潮湿的地区记录到的痛苦互动要少得多。这种差异可能取决于萨赫勒地区更高的种内和种间相遇率,那里的树木被鸟类占据的比例比潮湿的森林更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1