One Snake or Two? Exploring Medical Symbols Among Medical Students

Kazeem Kanmodi Kehinde, A. Oladimeji, Ayomikun Adesina Miracle, Francis Fagbule Omotayo, E. Franklin
{"title":"One Snake or Two? Exploring Medical Symbols Among Medical Students","authors":"Kazeem Kanmodi Kehinde, A. Oladimeji, Ayomikun Adesina Miracle, Francis Fagbule Omotayo, E. Franklin","doi":"10.2478/ACM-2019-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Symbols play a very crucial role in the culture of a society, and the medical society is not an exception to this. In the world of Orthodox medicine, the Rod of Asclepius is regarded as the true symbol of medicine. However, there exists to be an issue of interchange of the correct medical symbol (i.e. Rod of Asclepius) with another similar symbol (i.e. the Caduceus). This study aims to explore medical students’ knowledge and opinion on the appropriate symbol of medicine. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional survey of 84 medical students at the Usmanu Danfodiyo University (UDU), North-West Nigeria. Study tool was a paper questionnaire. The collected data were analyzed using the Epi info 7 Software. Results: The mean (±SD) age of the participants was 23.7 (±3.4) years, 72.6% were males, and 73.8% were in their 4th year. Only 59.5% had interest in non-medical literature. Also, only 6.0% had doctors as their parents. The majority (88.1%) of the participants erroneously identified the Caduceus symbol as the most appropriate symbol of medicine. Furthermore, only 45.2% indicated that the Rod of Asclepius and the Caduceus symbols originated from ancient Greece. Virtually all (97.6%) the participants opined that the Caduceus symbol is the most popular symbol of Medicine. Finally, the majority (73.8%) of the participants recommended that a course on the History of Medicine should be added to the medical curriculum of their school. Conclusion: This study found that the majority of the surveyed medical students did not know much about the historically correct medical symbol. This shows the need for awareness creation on the true symbol of medicine among medical students, and even the public-at-large.","PeriodicalId":30233,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Martiniana","volume":"19 1","pages":"78 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Martiniana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ACM-2019-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background: Symbols play a very crucial role in the culture of a society, and the medical society is not an exception to this. In the world of Orthodox medicine, the Rod of Asclepius is regarded as the true symbol of medicine. However, there exists to be an issue of interchange of the correct medical symbol (i.e. Rod of Asclepius) with another similar symbol (i.e. the Caduceus). This study aims to explore medical students’ knowledge and opinion on the appropriate symbol of medicine. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional survey of 84 medical students at the Usmanu Danfodiyo University (UDU), North-West Nigeria. Study tool was a paper questionnaire. The collected data were analyzed using the Epi info 7 Software. Results: The mean (±SD) age of the participants was 23.7 (±3.4) years, 72.6% were males, and 73.8% were in their 4th year. Only 59.5% had interest in non-medical literature. Also, only 6.0% had doctors as their parents. The majority (88.1%) of the participants erroneously identified the Caduceus symbol as the most appropriate symbol of medicine. Furthermore, only 45.2% indicated that the Rod of Asclepius and the Caduceus symbols originated from ancient Greece. Virtually all (97.6%) the participants opined that the Caduceus symbol is the most popular symbol of Medicine. Finally, the majority (73.8%) of the participants recommended that a course on the History of Medicine should be added to the medical curriculum of their school. Conclusion: This study found that the majority of the surveyed medical students did not know much about the historically correct medical symbol. This shows the need for awareness creation on the true symbol of medicine among medical students, and even the public-at-large.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一条蛇还是两条?医学生医学符号探索
摘要背景:符号在一个社会的文化中起着至关重要的作用,医学社会也不例外。在正统医学界,阿斯克勒庇俄斯之杖被认为是医学的真正象征。然而,存在着一个问题,即正确的医学符号(即阿斯克勒庇俄斯之杖)与另一个类似的符号(即Caduceus)的互换。本研究旨在探讨医学生对医学适当符号的认识和看法。方法:本研究对尼日利亚西北部乌斯马努·丹福迪约大学(UDU)的84名医学生进行了横断面调查。研究工具是一份纸质问卷。使用Epi-info 7软件对收集的数据进行分析。结果:参与者的平均(±SD)年龄为23.7(±3.4)岁,72.6%为男性,73.8%为4岁。只有59.5%的人对非医学文献感兴趣。此外,只有6.0%的人的父母是医生。大多数(88.1%)的参与者错误地认为Caduceus符号是最合适的医学符号。此外,只有45.2%的人认为阿斯克勒庇俄斯之杖和卡杜克乌斯符号起源于古希腊。几乎所有(97.6%)的参与者都认为Caduceus符号是最受欢迎的医学符号。最后,大多数(73.8%)的参与者建议在学校的医学课程中增加医学史课程。结论:本研究发现,大多数受访医学生对历史上正确的医学符号知之甚少。这表明需要在医学生甚至广大公众中提高对医学真正象征的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Medica Martiniana is a medical scientific journal, first published in print form in December 2001. It is a continuation of the journal / almanac Folia Medica Martiniana (1971 - 1996). The journal‘s owner is the Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Slovakia. Dissemination of research results and scientific knowledge from all areas of medicine and nursing. Stimulation, facilitation and supporting of publication activity for the young medical research and clinical generation. The contributions of young novice authors (PhD students and post-doctorials) are particularly welcome. Acta Medica Martiniana is an open-access journal, with a periodicity of publishing three times per year (Apr/Aug/Dec). It covers a wide range of basic medical disciplines, such as anatomy, histology, biochemistry, human physiology, pharmacology, etc., as well as all clinical areas incl. preventive medicine, public health and nursing. Interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary manuscripts, including papers from all areas of biomedical research, are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Fractured Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Biologic Therapies for Paediatric Asthma Capillaroscopy and Endopat – Helpful Methods for the Early Assessment of Increased Cardiovascular Risk in Anorexia Nervosa? Platelet miRNA Expression in Patients with Sticky Platelet Syndrome Anatomical and Ultrasound Study of the Mid-Femoral Sciatic Nerve and Its Division Delivery Mode Affects the Sympathetic Nervous System in Healthy Term Newborns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1