THE IMPACT OF PANCASILA AS THE STATE IDEOLOGY OF INDONESIA TOWARD THE PROVISION ON DEATH PENALTY IN THE PENAL CODE BILL

Cesar antonio Munthe, Paulinus Soge
{"title":"THE IMPACT OF PANCASILA AS THE STATE IDEOLOGY OF INDONESIA TOWARD THE PROVISION ON DEATH PENALTY IN THE PENAL CODE BILL","authors":"Cesar antonio Munthe, Paulinus Soge","doi":"10.24002/JEP.V34I1.1629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pancasila has been the state ideology of Indonesia since the day after the independence of Indonesia that is on the 18th of August 1945. It was formulated by our founding fathers by taking our own values and cultures inherited by our ancestors from some old kingdoms  such as Kutai in Kalimantan, Sriwijaya in Sumatra, and Majapahit in Java. One year after the independence  on the 17th of August 1945, Indonesian government promulgated Law No. 1 Year 1946 concerning The Penal Code on 26th  of  February 1946. Through this law the government at that time stated that Wetboek van Strafrecht voor Nederlandsch-Indie  (W.v.S. Ned. Indie (S. 1915 No. 732) as the main written penal code and was formally called  Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) which in Article 10 provides death penalty as the heaviest main punishment. Dealing with that provision there has been a long debate among Indonesian people whether death penalty is in accordance with Pancasila or not. Netherlands as the home base of death penalty dropped it out from its penal code in 1870 because of the strong struggle of human right proponents. In Indonesia a research carried out in 1981/1982 by The Law Faculty of Undip collaborating with the  The Supreme Court  found out that both proponents and opponents of death penalty used Pancasila as “justification”.  In the effort to give respect to both parties  legal drafters of the  Penal Code Bill provide death penalty as “specific punishment” and put it out of the main punishment  in the Penal Code Bill.Key Words: Pancasila, State ideology, Legal drafters, Specific punishment, The Penal Code Bill.","PeriodicalId":52874,"journal":{"name":"Justitia Et Pax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justitia Et Pax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24002/JEP.V34I1.1629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Pancasila has been the state ideology of Indonesia since the day after the independence of Indonesia that is on the 18th of August 1945. It was formulated by our founding fathers by taking our own values and cultures inherited by our ancestors from some old kingdoms  such as Kutai in Kalimantan, Sriwijaya in Sumatra, and Majapahit in Java. One year after the independence  on the 17th of August 1945, Indonesian government promulgated Law No. 1 Year 1946 concerning The Penal Code on 26th  of  February 1946. Through this law the government at that time stated that Wetboek van Strafrecht voor Nederlandsch-Indie  (W.v.S. Ned. Indie (S. 1915 No. 732) as the main written penal code and was formally called  Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) which in Article 10 provides death penalty as the heaviest main punishment. Dealing with that provision there has been a long debate among Indonesian people whether death penalty is in accordance with Pancasila or not. Netherlands as the home base of death penalty dropped it out from its penal code in 1870 because of the strong struggle of human right proponents. In Indonesia a research carried out in 1981/1982 by The Law Faculty of Undip collaborating with the  The Supreme Court  found out that both proponents and opponents of death penalty used Pancasila as “justification”.  In the effort to give respect to both parties  legal drafters of the  Penal Code Bill provide death penalty as “specific punishment” and put it out of the main punishment  in the Penal Code Bill.Key Words: Pancasila, State ideology, Legal drafters, Specific punishment, The Penal Code Bill.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼国家意识形态PANCASILA对《刑法》中死刑条款的影响
自1945年8月18日印度尼西亚独立后的第二天起,Pancasila就一直是印度尼西亚的国家意识形态。它是由我们的开国元勋们根据我们祖先从加里曼丹的库泰、苏门答腊的斯里维贾亚和爪哇的马贾帕希特等古老王国继承的我们自己的价值观和文化制定的。1945年8月17日独立一年后,印度尼西亚政府于1946年2月26日颁布了关于《刑法典》的1946年第1号法律。通过这项法律,当时的政府规定,Wetboek van Strafrecht voor Nederlandsch Indie(W.v.S.Ned.Indie(S.1915 No.732))是主要的成文刑法,并被正式称为Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana(KUHP),在第10条中规定死刑是最重的主要刑罚。关于这一条款,印尼人民一直在争论死刑是否符合Pancasila。1870年,由于人权支持者的强烈斗争,作为死刑发源地的荷兰将其从刑法中删除。在印度尼西亚,Undip法学院于1981/1982年与最高法院合作进行的一项研究发现,死刑的支持者和反对者都将Pancasila作为“正当理由”。为了尊重双方,《刑法典法案》的法律起草者将死刑定为“特定惩罚”,并将其从《刑法典》法案的主要惩罚中删除。关键词:Pancasila,国家意识形态,法律起草者,特定惩罚,《刑典法案》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
PENGUATAN NORMA SYARAT DISPENSASI KAWIN DALAM UPAYA PENCEGAHAN PERKAWINAN ANAK BERDASARKAN PERSPEKTIF TEORI TUJUAN HUKUM REVIEWING THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ON DEMOCRATIC ELECTION PRACTICES IN INDONESIA AND THE PHILIPPINES PENYADAPAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME DI INDONESIA DAN FILIPINA DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA REFORMULASI PENETRATION STRESS TEST SEBAGAI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DATA PRIBADI KONSUMEN DI ERA BISNIS DIGITAL TINJAUAN KRIMINOLOGIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN KERBAU DI WILAYAH HUKUM KEPOLISIAN RESOR SUMBA BARAT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1