Current medicines hold promise in the treatment of orphan infections due to brain-eating amoebae

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs Pub Date : 2021-12-02 DOI:10.1080/21678707.2021.2050368
R. Siddiqui, Mohamed Yehia Abouleish, Mustafa I. Khamis, T. Ibrahim, N. Khan
{"title":"Current medicines hold promise in the treatment of orphan infections due to brain-eating amoebae","authors":"R. Siddiqui, Mohamed Yehia Abouleish, Mustafa I. Khamis, T. Ibrahim, N. Khan","doi":"10.1080/21678707.2021.2050368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the opportunity and access to susceptible hosts, freeliving amoebae (Naegleria fowleri, Acanthamoeba spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris) can produce fatal diseases involving the brain[1]. It is disturbing that the rate of mortality has remained over 90%, despite decades of research in drug discovery and major breakthroughs taking place in chemotherapy and supportive care. For example, N. fowleri, the causative agent of primary amoebic meningoencephalitis was first described in 1965, while granulomatous amoebic meningoencephalitis due to Acanthamoeba and B. mandrillaris were reported in 1978 and 1990, respectively. Yet, the treatment using a combination of drugs (often antifungals such as amphotericin B and azoles) remains a hit-and-miss approach [2]. Even with treatment, reported cases with successful prognosis have been few and far between, requiring high suspicion together with early diagnosis, and a favorable outcome is mostly seen in the cases reported in the USA. The very high mortality rate is attributed to (i) inefficacy of drugs to penetrate the otherwise highly restrictive blood–brain barrier to target the parasites residing within the central nervous system, and (ii) the lack of available parasite-specific drugs. At present, the management of brain-eating amoebae infection involves a combination of drugs including, amidines, neomycin, biguanides, ergosterol inhibitors such as azoles/amphotericin B, sulfadiazine, milfetosine, etc.[2]. Several compounds may not be effective in reaching the infection site (limited blood–brain barrier permeability), exhibit inadequate amoebicidal properties in vivo at physiologically relevant concentrations, and/or show high host cell cytotoxicity. Given the rarity of the disease, it is not surprising that the pharmaceutical industry has shown no interest in the development and/or modulation of compounds that are blood–brain barrier permeable with potential to target the brain-eating amoebae effectively at the infection site, without harming human cells. The reuse of medicines is a valid avenue to expedite our advances in the development of effective treatment options against neglected brain-eating amoebae infections. Herein, we discuss clinically used drugs for neuropathological conditions that are blood–brain barrier permeable, as well as parasitespecific compounds developed against related protozoa, as potential avenues to design chemotherapeutics against orphan infections due to pathogenic free-living amoebae (Figure 1). In this regard, there are three avenues to be explored;","PeriodicalId":12118,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs","volume":"9 1","pages":"227 - 235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678707.2021.2050368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Given the opportunity and access to susceptible hosts, freeliving amoebae (Naegleria fowleri, Acanthamoeba spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris) can produce fatal diseases involving the brain[1]. It is disturbing that the rate of mortality has remained over 90%, despite decades of research in drug discovery and major breakthroughs taking place in chemotherapy and supportive care. For example, N. fowleri, the causative agent of primary amoebic meningoencephalitis was first described in 1965, while granulomatous amoebic meningoencephalitis due to Acanthamoeba and B. mandrillaris were reported in 1978 and 1990, respectively. Yet, the treatment using a combination of drugs (often antifungals such as amphotericin B and azoles) remains a hit-and-miss approach [2]. Even with treatment, reported cases with successful prognosis have been few and far between, requiring high suspicion together with early diagnosis, and a favorable outcome is mostly seen in the cases reported in the USA. The very high mortality rate is attributed to (i) inefficacy of drugs to penetrate the otherwise highly restrictive blood–brain barrier to target the parasites residing within the central nervous system, and (ii) the lack of available parasite-specific drugs. At present, the management of brain-eating amoebae infection involves a combination of drugs including, amidines, neomycin, biguanides, ergosterol inhibitors such as azoles/amphotericin B, sulfadiazine, milfetosine, etc.[2]. Several compounds may not be effective in reaching the infection site (limited blood–brain barrier permeability), exhibit inadequate amoebicidal properties in vivo at physiologically relevant concentrations, and/or show high host cell cytotoxicity. Given the rarity of the disease, it is not surprising that the pharmaceutical industry has shown no interest in the development and/or modulation of compounds that are blood–brain barrier permeable with potential to target the brain-eating amoebae effectively at the infection site, without harming human cells. The reuse of medicines is a valid avenue to expedite our advances in the development of effective treatment options against neglected brain-eating amoebae infections. Herein, we discuss clinically used drugs for neuropathological conditions that are blood–brain barrier permeable, as well as parasitespecific compounds developed against related protozoa, as potential avenues to design chemotherapeutics against orphan infections due to pathogenic free-living amoebae (Figure 1). In this regard, there are three avenues to be explored;
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目前的药物有望治疗食脑变形虫引起的孤儿感染
如果有机会和机会接触易感宿主,自由生活的变形虫(福氏奈格里亚变形虫、棘阿米巴属变形虫、山豆属变形虫)会产生涉及大脑的致命疾病[1]。令人不安的是,尽管在药物发现方面进行了几十年的研究,在化疗和支持性护理方面取得了重大突破,但死亡率仍保持在90%以上。例如,原发性阿米巴脑膜脑炎的病原体福氏N.fowleri于1965年首次被描述,而由棘阿米巴和曼陀罗菌引起的肉芽肿性阿米巴脑膜炎分别于1978年和1990年被报道。然而,使用联合药物(通常是抗真菌药物,如两性霉素B和唑类药物)的治疗仍然是一种偶然的方法[2]。即使进行了治疗,报告的预后成功的病例也很少,需要高度怀疑和早期诊断,而良好的结果大多出现在美国报告的病例中。极高的死亡率归因于(i)药物无法穿透原本限制性很强的血脑屏障来靶向中枢神经系统内的寄生虫,以及(ii)缺乏可用的寄生虫特异性药物。目前,食脑变形虫感染的治疗涉及多种药物的组合,包括脒、新霉素、双胍、麦角固醇抑制剂,如唑类/两性霉素B、磺胺嘧啶、米胎肽等[2]。一些化合物可能无法有效到达感染部位(血脑屏障通透性有限),在生理相关浓度下在体内表现出不足的杀阿米巴特性和/或表现出高的宿主细胞毒性。鉴于这种疾病的罕见性,制药行业对开发和/或调节血脑屏障可渗透的化合物没有兴趣也就不足为奇了,这些化合物有可能在感染部位有效靶向吃脑变形虫,而不会伤害人体细胞。药物的重复使用是加快我们开发有效治疗方案以对抗被忽视的食脑变形虫感染的有效途径。在此,我们讨论了临床上用于治疗血脑屏障可渗透的神经病理学疾病的药物,以及针对相关原生动物开发的寄生虫特异性化合物,作为设计治疗由致病性自由生活变形虫引起的孤儿感染的潜在途径(图1)。在这方面,有三条途径有待探索;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs
Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs is an international, peer-reviewed journal that covers all aspects of R&D on rare diseases and orphan drugs.
期刊最新文献
Emerging therapies against Naegleria fowleri Current and emerging therapies for the treatment of leishmaniasis The Orphan Drug Act and rare cancers: a retrospective analysis of oncologic orphan drug designations and associated approvals from 1983-2022 Orphan drugs approved in Canada: health technology assessment, price negotiation, and government formulary listing Overview of genetic testing in Prader-willi syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1