Yuppies: Young Urban Professionals and the Making of Postindustrial New York

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q4 BUSINESS Enterprise & Society Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1017/eso.2021.48
D. Gottlieb
{"title":"Yuppies: Young Urban Professionals and the Making of Postindustrial New York","authors":"D. Gottlieb","doi":"10.1017/eso.2021.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the early 1980s, the yuppie stereotype emerged as an object of media and popular fascination. In 1984,Newsweekmagazinedeclared it the “Year of theYuppie,” thewords emblazoned above a Gary Trudeau caricature of two urbane white people in New York’s Central Park. Inside, an article profiled the members of this newly discovered class: professionals who earned high salaries, coveted loft apartments, trained for marathons, owned Cuisinarts, and supped on sushi and chardonnay. Elsewhere, commentators trotted out the image of the yuppie to make sense of a host of related issues: from new modes of masculinity, to unease about consumerism, to the entrance of women into the professions. Yuppies, ultimately, were anxieties about affluence made flesh.1 When I began my dissertation research, I wondered: What would happen if we took “yuppies” seriously—not as a stereotype or as an object of satire, but as a real demographic wave that washed over America’s cities beginning in the late 1970s?What would I discover if I looked critically at the highly educated professionals who came to New York to work onWall Street and in law firms? Would it help me tell a new story about the 1980s—one that did not foreground Ronald Reagan, Sunbelt suburbanites, corporate revanchists, or conservative economists, as other historians have?2 What I discovered was that yuppies themselves—real, living young urban professionals— are essential to understanding how the booming financial and professional sectors remade America in the closing decades of the twentieth century. They were at the forefront of the concentration of capital and brainpower in ahandful of cities. They embodied the split ofwhat was once a broad middle class in two: an upwardly mobile, college-educated metropolitan class, on the one hand, and a downwardly mobile class of workers on the other. They transformed American politics, as the Democratic Party became more beholden to educated professionals than to blue-collar workers, more indebted to Wall Street than to urban political machines, more in thrall to highly paid young people than to older or poorer voters. Ultimately, yuppies, while never numerous enough to swing national elections by themselves, were able to reshape American politics—and with it, American economic and social life.","PeriodicalId":45977,"journal":{"name":"Enterprise & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enterprise & Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/eso.2021.48","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the early 1980s, the yuppie stereotype emerged as an object of media and popular fascination. In 1984,Newsweekmagazinedeclared it the “Year of theYuppie,” thewords emblazoned above a Gary Trudeau caricature of two urbane white people in New York’s Central Park. Inside, an article profiled the members of this newly discovered class: professionals who earned high salaries, coveted loft apartments, trained for marathons, owned Cuisinarts, and supped on sushi and chardonnay. Elsewhere, commentators trotted out the image of the yuppie to make sense of a host of related issues: from new modes of masculinity, to unease about consumerism, to the entrance of women into the professions. Yuppies, ultimately, were anxieties about affluence made flesh.1 When I began my dissertation research, I wondered: What would happen if we took “yuppies” seriously—not as a stereotype or as an object of satire, but as a real demographic wave that washed over America’s cities beginning in the late 1970s?What would I discover if I looked critically at the highly educated professionals who came to New York to work onWall Street and in law firms? Would it help me tell a new story about the 1980s—one that did not foreground Ronald Reagan, Sunbelt suburbanites, corporate revanchists, or conservative economists, as other historians have?2 What I discovered was that yuppies themselves—real, living young urban professionals— are essential to understanding how the booming financial and professional sectors remade America in the closing decades of the twentieth century. They were at the forefront of the concentration of capital and brainpower in ahandful of cities. They embodied the split ofwhat was once a broad middle class in two: an upwardly mobile, college-educated metropolitan class, on the one hand, and a downwardly mobile class of workers on the other. They transformed American politics, as the Democratic Party became more beholden to educated professionals than to blue-collar workers, more indebted to Wall Street than to urban political machines, more in thrall to highly paid young people than to older or poorer voters. Ultimately, yuppies, while never numerous enough to swing national elections by themselves, were able to reshape American politics—and with it, American economic and social life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雅皮士:年轻的城市专业人士与后工业时代的纽约
20世纪80年代初,雅皮士的刻板印象成为媒体和大众迷恋的对象。1984年,《新闻周刊》杂志宣布这是“雅皮士年”,加里·特鲁多(Gary Trudeau)在纽约中央公园讽刺两位彬彬有礼的白人时,上面印着这样的字样。在里面,一篇文章介绍了这个新发现的阶层的成员:高薪的专业人士,令人垂涎的阁楼公寓,马拉松训练,拥有Cuisinarts,吃寿司和霞多丽。在其他地方,评论家们抛出雅皮士的形象来理解一系列相关问题:从新的男性气质模式,到对消费主义的不安,再到女性进入职业。雅皮士最终是对富裕的焦虑变成了现实。1当我开始论文研究时,我想知道:如果我们认真对待“雅皮士”,而不是把它当作刻板印象或讽刺的对象,而是从20世纪70年代末开始席卷美国城市的一股真正的人口浪潮,会发生什么?如果我批判性地审视那些来到纽约在华尔街和律师事务所工作的受过高等教育的专业人士,我会发现什么?这是否有助于我讲述一个关于20世纪80年代的新故事——一个没有像其他历史学家那样展望罗纳德·里根、阳光地带郊区居民、企业复仇主义者或保守派经济学家的故事?2我发现,雅皮士本身——真正的、活着的年轻城市专业人士——对于理解20世纪末蓬勃发展的金融和专业部门如何重塑美国至关重要。他们处于资本和脑力在众多城市集中的前沿。它们体现了曾经广泛的中产阶级一分为二的分裂:一方面是向上流动的受过大学教育的大都市阶级,另一方面是向下流动的工人阶级。他们改变了美国政治,因为民主党更感激受过教育的专业人士而不是蓝领工人,更感激华尔街而不是城市政治机器,更受制于高薪年轻人而不是年长或贫穷的选民。最终,雅皮士虽然数量永远不足以独自左右全国选举,但他们能够重塑美国政治——以及美国的经济和社会生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
30.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Enterprise & Society offers a forum for research on the historical relations between businesses and their larger political, cultural, institutional, social, and economic contexts. The journal aims to be truly international in scope. Studies focused on individual firms and industries and grounded in a broad historical framework are welcome, as are innovative applications of economic or management theories to business and its context.
期刊最新文献
Industrial Policy and its Funding at the Frontier of European Integration: Lessons from the Past and Present Challenges Paper Steaks: Live Cattle Futures Markets and the Financial Revolution of 1964 The Role of Forecasts in Planning for Energy Infrastructure: A Historical Look at Past Futures in Postwar Quebec “Killing Complaints with Courtesy”: The Role of Relationship Building in the Success of the Early U.S. Central Power Stations (1890–1938) Wartime segmentation: Class, gender, and nation in the marketing of consumers, Sweden 1939–1945
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1