Goldin, C. (2021). Career & Family: Women’s Century-Long Journey Toward Equity

IF 4.4 2区 社会学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Work and Occupations Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI:10.1177/07308884221146324
Amy S. Wharton
{"title":"Goldin, C. (2021). Career & Family: Women’s Century-Long Journey Toward Equity","authors":"Amy S. Wharton","doi":"10.1177/07308884221146324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"staff, and students) is a much needed and welcome addition to the discussions around stigmatization. By sharing janitors’ accounts of abusive comments from customers, or their recollections of customers ignoring them altogether, Alvarez adds depth to claims of janitors’ communicative isolation and invisibility. Exploring the communication between individuals in service jobs and their clients is also important from the perspective of dirty work research. As some writers have argued (Malvini Redden & Scarduzio, 2018), attending to the communicative dimensions of worker–customer interactions is urgent for an enhanced appreciation of how work becomes more or less dirty (or clean). On this note, for a book with “dirty work” in the title, there is surprisingly little engagement with the dirty work scholarship. The janitorial work examined here is undeniably dirty, as workers’ narratives and some customers’ voices would suggest (see, e.g., pages 15 and 75); however, dirty work is only mentioned in passing. It is not unpacked with reference to the scholarship’s unique preoccupation with the negative impact of societal stigmatizing views on workers’ personal identities and how workers then manage this impact through symbolic and material coping techniques. Rather, the book is about everyday communication and its embedded stigma-reinforcing mechanisms, unfolding against the backdrop of the perceptions of janitorial work as dirty. Communication researchers will find Alvarez’s account of great interest. The book may also be of value to scholars working in the wider domain of social sciences and humanities, but also to practitioners and leaders in nonprofit, academic organizations that aspire to “walk the talk” of inclusivity.","PeriodicalId":47716,"journal":{"name":"Work and Occupations","volume":"50 1","pages":"582 - 584"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work and Occupations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884221146324","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

staff, and students) is a much needed and welcome addition to the discussions around stigmatization. By sharing janitors’ accounts of abusive comments from customers, or their recollections of customers ignoring them altogether, Alvarez adds depth to claims of janitors’ communicative isolation and invisibility. Exploring the communication between individuals in service jobs and their clients is also important from the perspective of dirty work research. As some writers have argued (Malvini Redden & Scarduzio, 2018), attending to the communicative dimensions of worker–customer interactions is urgent for an enhanced appreciation of how work becomes more or less dirty (or clean). On this note, for a book with “dirty work” in the title, there is surprisingly little engagement with the dirty work scholarship. The janitorial work examined here is undeniably dirty, as workers’ narratives and some customers’ voices would suggest (see, e.g., pages 15 and 75); however, dirty work is only mentioned in passing. It is not unpacked with reference to the scholarship’s unique preoccupation with the negative impact of societal stigmatizing views on workers’ personal identities and how workers then manage this impact through symbolic and material coping techniques. Rather, the book is about everyday communication and its embedded stigma-reinforcing mechanisms, unfolding against the backdrop of the perceptions of janitorial work as dirty. Communication researchers will find Alvarez’s account of great interest. The book may also be of value to scholars working in the wider domain of social sciences and humanities, but also to practitioners and leaders in nonprofit, academic organizations that aspire to “walk the talk” of inclusivity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
戈尔丁,C.(2021)。职业与家庭:女性迈向公平的百年之旅
员工和学生)是围绕污名化的讨论中非常需要和受欢迎的补充。通过分享看门人对顾客辱骂的描述,或者他们对顾客完全无视他们的回忆,阿尔瓦雷斯为看门人的沟通孤立和隐蔽性增加了深度。从脏活研究的角度来看,探索从事服务工作的个人与其客户之间的沟通也很重要。正如一些作家所说(Malvini-Redden&Scarduzio,2018),关注员工与客户互动的沟通维度,对于增强对工作如何变得或多或少肮脏(或干净)的认识至关重要。在这一点上,对于一本标题中有“肮脏工作”的书来说,令人惊讶的是,与肮脏工作奖学金的接触很少。正如工人的叙述和一些顾客的声音所暗示的那样,这里审查的清洁工作无疑是肮脏的(例如,见第15页和第75页);然而,脏活只是顺便提一下。这并不是指该奖学金对社会污名化观点对工人个人身份的负面影响的独特关注,以及工人如何通过象征性和物质应对技术来管理这种影响。相反,这本书讲述的是日常交流及其根深蒂固的污名强化机制,在人们认为清洁工作肮脏的背景下展开。传播研究人员会发现阿尔瓦雷斯的叙述非常有趣。这本书可能对在更广泛的社会科学和人文学科领域工作的学者也有价值,但对渴望“言行一致”包容性的非营利学术组织的从业者和领导者也有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
24.10%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: For over 30 years, Work and Occupations has published rigorous social science research on the human dynamics of the workplace, employment, and society from an international, interdisciplinary perspective. Work and Occupations provides you with a broad perspective on the workplace, examining international approaches to work-related issues as well as insights from scholars in a variety of fields, including: anthropology, demography, education, government administration, history, industrial relations, labour economics, management, psychology, and sociology. In addition to regular features including research notes, review essays, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Exit, Voice, and Solidarity: Contesting Precarity in the US and European Telecommunications Industries by Doellgast, Virginia More Than a Match: “Fit” as a Tool in Hiring Decisions The Gender Wage Gap, Between-Firm Inequality, and Devaluation: Testing a New Hypothesis in the Service Sector. Living to Work (from Home): Overwork, Remote Work, and Gendered Dual Devotion to Work and Family Disability and the State Production of Precarity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1