How Old is the Hebrew Bible? A Response to Konrad Schmid

IF 0.2 2区哲学 0 RELIGION ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1515/zaw-2021-3002

Ronald S. Hendel

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The methodological issues about how to integrate the linguistic history of Hebrew into our inquiries into the literary history of the Bible are complicated and controverted. In this contribution to the discussion, I attempt to clarify areas of agreement and disagreement, provide an example (Genesis 1–11) where some of the issues of integration of methods can be tested, and consider the relevant evidence for the emulation of classical Hebrew.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

希伯来圣经有多古老？对Konrad Schmid的回应

摘要关于如何将希伯来语的语言史纳入我们对《圣经》文学史的研究的方法论问题是复杂而有争议的。在这篇对讨论的贡献中，我试图澄清同意和不同意的领域，提供一个例子（创世纪1-11），其中可以测试方法整合的一些问题，并考虑模拟古典希伯来语的相关证据。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, which is published in four issues of 160 pages each plus supplements, has been the leading international and interconfessional periodical in the field of research in the Old Testament und Early Judaism for over one hundred years. Open to various ways of posing the questions of scholarship, the journal features high quality contributions in English, German, and French. Through its review of periodicals and books, it provides fast and reliable information concerning new publications in the field.

期刊最新文献

The North (ṣāpôn) in the Book of Jeremiah The Nameless Daughter of Saul Job’s Clean Hands: A Proposal for Job 22:30 Zeitschriften- und Bücherschau W^ehinne »und da« – Zur erlebten Rede in der Hebräischen Bibel