Local Governments’ Strategy for the Development of Social Organizations

IF 0.4 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION China Nonprofit Review Pub Date : 2017-12-12 DOI:10.1163/18765149-12341332
Kegao Yan, Shu-Wen Lin, B. Ren
{"title":"Local Governments’ Strategy for the Development of Social Organizations","authors":"Kegao Yan, Shu-Wen Lin, B. Ren","doi":"10.1163/18765149-12341332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the central government encourages local governments to innovate the system for social organization management propitious to the development of social organizations, but social organizations are double-edged, which can both alleviate the social management pressure of local governments and challenge their authority. Therefore, local governments have to implement the strategy of differential control for managing social organizations. The theory of differential control is an important paradigm for explaining the government-society relationship in China, as it provides a theoretical framework for understanding local governments’ behavioral logic of developing social organizations, but local governments’ specific application and change of the strategy about differential control still need to be further explored. Based on the above observation, by collecting the panel data of 312 prefecture-level cities of China in 2008-2014, we have discovered that local governments, on the whole, have adopted the development strategy of “developing quantity and restraining capability.” They give priority to developing social organizations promoting economic development and social service, but implement strict control over environmental, legal, and international foreign-related organizations affecting the realization of economic goals or political stability. With a more developed economy and better fiscal revenues, a more lenient environment is given to social organizations by local governments, and social organizations are more developed. But the control over environmental social organizations does not change with the changes of economic development or fiscal revenues. This study not only expands the theory of differential control and provides a new understanding of the relations between government and social organizations, but also reveals local governments’ behavioral logic of developing social organizations, which also provides a new perspective for understanding local governments’ behaviors in developing social organizations.","PeriodicalId":41661,"journal":{"name":"China Nonprofit Review","volume":"9 1","pages":"225-255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18765149-12341332","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Nonprofit Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18765149-12341332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In recent years, the central government encourages local governments to innovate the system for social organization management propitious to the development of social organizations, but social organizations are double-edged, which can both alleviate the social management pressure of local governments and challenge their authority. Therefore, local governments have to implement the strategy of differential control for managing social organizations. The theory of differential control is an important paradigm for explaining the government-society relationship in China, as it provides a theoretical framework for understanding local governments’ behavioral logic of developing social organizations, but local governments’ specific application and change of the strategy about differential control still need to be further explored. Based on the above observation, by collecting the panel data of 312 prefecture-level cities of China in 2008-2014, we have discovered that local governments, on the whole, have adopted the development strategy of “developing quantity and restraining capability.” They give priority to developing social organizations promoting economic development and social service, but implement strict control over environmental, legal, and international foreign-related organizations affecting the realization of economic goals or political stability. With a more developed economy and better fiscal revenues, a more lenient environment is given to social organizations by local governments, and social organizations are more developed. But the control over environmental social organizations does not change with the changes of economic development or fiscal revenues. This study not only expands the theory of differential control and provides a new understanding of the relations between government and social organizations, but also reveals local governments’ behavioral logic of developing social organizations, which also provides a new perspective for understanding local governments’ behaviors in developing social organizations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地方政府的社会组织发展战略
近年来,中央政府鼓励地方政府创新有利于社会组织发展的社会组织管理体制,但社会组织是一把双刃剑,既能缓解地方政府的社会管理压力,又能挑战地方政府的权威。因此,地方政府对社会组织的管理必须实施差异化控制策略。差异控制理论是解释中国政府与社会关系的重要范式,为理解地方政府发展社会组织的行为逻辑提供了理论框架,但地方政府在差异控制战略上的具体应用和转变仍有待进一步探索。基于上述观察,通过收集2008-2014年中国312个地级市的面板数据,我们发现地方政府总体上采取了“发展数量、约束能力”的发展战略,但对影响经济目标实现或政治稳定的环境、法律和国际涉外组织实施严格控制。随着经济的发展和财政收入的增加,地方政府对社会组织的环境更加宽松,社会组织也更加发达。但对环境社会组织的控制并不会随着经济发展或财政收入的变化而改变。本研究不仅拓展了差异控制理论,为理解政府与社会组织的关系提供了新的视角,也揭示了地方政府发展社会组织的行为逻辑,为理解地方政府在发展社会组织中的行为提供了新视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
China Nonprofit Review
China Nonprofit Review PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
336
期刊最新文献
Excluded from Political Task: NGO s’ Marginalized Participation in China’s Accurate Poverty Alleviation Project Retrospective Observations on “Legitimacy” of Charitable Fundraising amid COVID-19 Community Resilience: A New Theme in Modernizing Community-Level Governance System and Capability in China Regulating Emergency Volunteer Management to Promote the Development of Emergency Response Voluntary Services Is It a “Window of Opportunity” to Develop a New Normal of Government-Society Cooperation in Emergency Management?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1