D. Dolan, Nithya Kanagasegar, Gianna Dingillo, Christine E. Alvarado, Avanti Badrinathan, A. Bassiri, Jonathan D Rice, Jillian N. Sinopoli, Leonidas Tapias, P. Linden, C. Towe
{"title":"Delayed Esophagectomy is Associated With Inferior Survival: A National Cancer Database Study","authors":"D. Dolan, Nithya Kanagasegar, Gianna Dingillo, Christine E. Alvarado, Avanti Badrinathan, A. Bassiri, Jonathan D Rice, Jillian N. Sinopoli, Leonidas Tapias, P. Linden, C. Towe","doi":"10.1177/26345161231171846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer is typically treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery 4 to 8 weeks later. Occasionally surgery is delayed >12 weeks; outcomes of this approach are not well studied. We hypothesized that delayed esophagectomy after chemoradiation would have inferior long-term overall survival relative to planned trimodality esophagectomy. Adult patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (T2−4aN0M0, T0−4aN+M0) who received multi-agent chemotherapy, radiation, and esophagectomy were identified in the 2018 National Cancer Database. Esophagectomy performed within 90 days from end of chemoradiation were categorized as “trimodality” and those ≥90 days were categorized as “delayed.” Primary outcome was overall survival measured using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard models. Secondary outcomes included surgical margin status, hospital length of stay, and readmission. Included were 19 698 patients, 3905 (19.8%) “delayed.” Median time to surgery for trimodality patients was 51 days (IQR 41-63) versus 110 days (IQR 98-131) for delayed patients. Delayed patients tended to be older, non-white, have non-private insurance, and have more comorbidities. Overall survival was shorter for delayed patients (34.8 months) versus trimodality patients (43.1 months, P ≤ .001). In multivariable analysis, delay was associated with inferior overall survival (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.08-1.23). Length of stay and readmission rate were similar between cohorts, but delay was associated with a higher rate of positive surgical margins (6.7% vs 4.6%, P ≤ .001). In the National Cancer Database, delayed esophagectomy is associated with inferior long-term survival. Nonetheless, delayed esophagectomy may be appropriate for select patients; further research is needed to identify the optimal approach.","PeriodicalId":73049,"journal":{"name":"Foregut (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foregut (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26345161231171846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer is typically treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery 4 to 8 weeks later. Occasionally surgery is delayed >12 weeks; outcomes of this approach are not well studied. We hypothesized that delayed esophagectomy after chemoradiation would have inferior long-term overall survival relative to planned trimodality esophagectomy. Adult patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (T2−4aN0M0, T0−4aN+M0) who received multi-agent chemotherapy, radiation, and esophagectomy were identified in the 2018 National Cancer Database. Esophagectomy performed within 90 days from end of chemoradiation were categorized as “trimodality” and those ≥90 days were categorized as “delayed.” Primary outcome was overall survival measured using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard models. Secondary outcomes included surgical margin status, hospital length of stay, and readmission. Included were 19 698 patients, 3905 (19.8%) “delayed.” Median time to surgery for trimodality patients was 51 days (IQR 41-63) versus 110 days (IQR 98-131) for delayed patients. Delayed patients tended to be older, non-white, have non-private insurance, and have more comorbidities. Overall survival was shorter for delayed patients (34.8 months) versus trimodality patients (43.1 months, P ≤ .001). In multivariable analysis, delay was associated with inferior overall survival (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.08-1.23). Length of stay and readmission rate were similar between cohorts, but delay was associated with a higher rate of positive surgical margins (6.7% vs 4.6%, P ≤ .001). In the National Cancer Database, delayed esophagectomy is associated with inferior long-term survival. Nonetheless, delayed esophagectomy may be appropriate for select patients; further research is needed to identify the optimal approach.