Attitude and satisfaction towards electronic exams in medical sciences faculty members

Z. Zahedi, H. Salehiniya, A. Zarei, H. Abbaszadeh
{"title":"Attitude and satisfaction towards electronic exams in medical sciences faculty members","authors":"Z. Zahedi, H. Salehiniya, A. Zarei, H. Abbaszadeh","doi":"10.34172/rdme.2021.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of electronic exams (E-exams) has benefits in educational systems. The views of critical stakeholders, including faculty members, around E-exams should be taken into consideration in order to derive the most benefits. Due to the recent expansion of the use of E-exams at the Birjand University of Medical Sciences (BUMS), this study was conducted to assess faculty members ‘ attitude towards and satisfaction with E-exams. Methods: This cross-sectional study included all faculty members at the university using a census sampling method. A researcher-created questionnaire with demographic, attitude, and satisfaction sections was used to collect the data. The content validity index and the content validity ratio were used to assess validity, and Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess reliability. Scoring was based on a 5-point Likert scale. SPSS was used to analyze the data using t-test and ANOVA at a significance level of 0.05. Results: Of the 126 faculty members who participated, 56.3% were women and 43.7% were men. The mean score of faculty members’ attitude was 69.19±9.51 and their satisfaction score was 33.27±5.00. A significant difference was found in the mean score of attitude by faculty (P=0.038). A positive correlation was found between attitude and satisfaction (r=0.537), and attitude and satisfaction with work experience (r=0.002 and r=0.233, respectively) which indicates that the correlation between attitude and satisfaction was significant (P <0.001) Conclusion: Overall, there was a moderately positive attitude toward and a high level of satisfaction with e-exams among medical sciences faculty members. Given the correlation between attitude and satisfaction, these two categories should be taken into consideration together.","PeriodicalId":21087,"journal":{"name":"Research and Development in Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Development in Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/rdme.2021.029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of electronic exams (E-exams) has benefits in educational systems. The views of critical stakeholders, including faculty members, around E-exams should be taken into consideration in order to derive the most benefits. Due to the recent expansion of the use of E-exams at the Birjand University of Medical Sciences (BUMS), this study was conducted to assess faculty members ‘ attitude towards and satisfaction with E-exams. Methods: This cross-sectional study included all faculty members at the university using a census sampling method. A researcher-created questionnaire with demographic, attitude, and satisfaction sections was used to collect the data. The content validity index and the content validity ratio were used to assess validity, and Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess reliability. Scoring was based on a 5-point Likert scale. SPSS was used to analyze the data using t-test and ANOVA at a significance level of 0.05. Results: Of the 126 faculty members who participated, 56.3% were women and 43.7% were men. The mean score of faculty members’ attitude was 69.19±9.51 and their satisfaction score was 33.27±5.00. A significant difference was found in the mean score of attitude by faculty (P=0.038). A positive correlation was found between attitude and satisfaction (r=0.537), and attitude and satisfaction with work experience (r=0.002 and r=0.233, respectively) which indicates that the correlation between attitude and satisfaction was significant (P <0.001) Conclusion: Overall, there was a moderately positive attitude toward and a high level of satisfaction with e-exams among medical sciences faculty members. Given the correlation between attitude and satisfaction, these two categories should be taken into consideration together.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学教师对电子考试的态度与满意度
背景:电子考试的使用对教育系统有好处。为了获得最大的利益,应该考虑包括教职员工在内的关键利益相关者对电子考试的看法。由于Birjand医学科学大学(BUMS)最近扩大了电子考试的使用范围,本研究旨在评估教职员工对电子考试的态度和满意度。方法:这项横断面研究采用人口普查抽样方法,包括该大学的所有教职员工。一名研究人员制作了一份包含人口统计、态度和满意度部分的问卷,用于收集数据。内容有效性指数和内容有效性比率用于评估有效性,Cronbachα用于评估可靠性。评分基于5分的Likert量表。使用SPSS对数据进行t检验和方差分析,显著性水平为0.05。结果:126名教师中,女性占56.3%,男性占43.7%。教职工态度平均分为69.19±9.51,满意度平均分为33.27±5.00。教师态度的平均得分存在显著差异(P=0.038)。态度与满意度(r=0.537)、态度与工作经验满意度(分别为r=0.002和r=0.233)呈正相关,表明态度与满意度之间存在显著相关性(P<0.001),医学院教员对电子考试的态度较为积极,满意度较高。考虑到态度和满意度之间的相关性,这两个类别应该一起考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
The role of academic stress and scientific motivation in predicting research spirit among the students of medicalsciences The relationship between identity development and medical students’ performance in technology-integrated English language classrooms Challenges in the educational system of maxillofacial surgery residency training in Iran: Monodisciplinarity system or dual degree system? The use of social media (communication applications) in the training of medical students, especially oral and maxillofacial surgery residents in Iran Challenges and acceptance of e-teaching among medical professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1