IL as the Collective Godhead ˀIlū in LB Ugarit

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ORIENTAL SOCIETY Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI:10.7817/jaos.143.2.2023.ar015
D. Tsumura
{"title":"IL as the Collective Godhead ˀIlū in LB Ugarit","authors":"D. Tsumura","doi":"10.7817/jaos.143.2.2023.ar015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nIt is generally assumed that a cult of El existed in Late Bronze Age Ugarit and that the alphabetic spelling IL must refer either to the generic “god” or to the divine name El. However, such an either-or question is too simplistic when we are dealing with the multifarious nature of polytheism. In the light of Ugaritic material, which includes the liturgical texts, several “pantheon” lists, a quadrilingual vocabulary, as well as theophoric personal names, it is obvious that IL also can refer to the collective godhead Ilū. Furthermore, IL in the ritual-myth text KTU 1.23 is distinct from El in the Baal cycle. In light of several Greek and ancient Near Eastern myths of “divine engenderment,” KTU 1.23 most likely deals with the motif of the collective godhead IL (ˀIlū), who impregnated two human women in order to engender two sets of divinities. Hence, the deus otiosus theory that IL in 1.23 is a “younger” El should be rejected. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":46777,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ORIENTAL SOCIETY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ORIENTAL SOCIETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7817/jaos.143.2.2023.ar015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is generally assumed that a cult of El existed in Late Bronze Age Ugarit and that the alphabetic spelling IL must refer either to the generic “god” or to the divine name El. However, such an either-or question is too simplistic when we are dealing with the multifarious nature of polytheism. In the light of Ugaritic material, which includes the liturgical texts, several “pantheon” lists, a quadrilingual vocabulary, as well as theophoric personal names, it is obvious that IL also can refer to the collective godhead Ilū. Furthermore, IL in the ritual-myth text KTU 1.23 is distinct from El in the Baal cycle. In light of several Greek and ancient Near Eastern myths of “divine engenderment,” KTU 1.23 most likely deals with the motif of the collective godhead IL (ˀIlū), who impregnated two human women in order to engender two sets of divinities. Hence, the deus otiosus theory that IL in 1.23 is a “younger” El should be rejected.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IL在LB Ugarit担任集体教头
人们普遍认为,青铜时代晚期的乌加里特存在对El的崇拜,字母拼写IL必须指代通用的“神”或神名El。然而,当我们处理多神教的多样性时,这样的非此即彼的问题过于简单。根据乌加里特语材料,其中包括礼拜仪式文本、几个“万神殿”列表、四语词汇以及神隐式人名,很明显,IL也可以指代集体教头Ilū。此外,仪式神话文本KTU 1.23中的IL与巴尔周期中的El不同。根据希腊和古代近东关于“神的产生”的几个神话,KTU 1.23很可能涉及集体教头IL(ˀIlū)的主题,她让两个人类女性怀孕,以产生两套神。因此,关于1.23中的IL是“年轻”El的deus otiosus理论应该被拒绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: The American Oriental Society is the oldest learned society in the United States devoted to a particular field of scholarship. The Society was founded in 1842, preceded only by such distinguished organizations of general scope as the American Philosophical Society (1743), the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1780), and the American Antiquarian Society (1812). From the beginning its aims have been humanistic. The encouragement of basic research in the languages and literatures of Asia has always been central in its tradition. This tradition has come to include such subjects as philology, literary criticism, textual criticism, paleography, epigraphy, linguistics, biography, archaeology, and the history of the intellectual and imaginative aspects of Oriental civilizations.
期刊最新文献
Review of Messianic Ideas and Movements in Sunnī Islam Consonantal Dotting and the Oral Quran Review of Lineages Embedded in Temple Networks: Daoism and Local Society in Ming China Review of Untersuchungen zur transtextuellen Poetik assyrischer herrschaftlich-narrativer Texte Review of Qur’anic Stories: God, Revelation and the Audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1