Exploring States’ Variations in Prevalence and Eligibility Criteria for Students With Visual Impairments Including Blindness

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Remedial and Special Education Pub Date : 2022-04-04 DOI:10.1177/07419325221083656
Rachel Anne Schles, Tessa McCarthy
{"title":"Exploring States’ Variations in Prevalence and Eligibility Criteria for Students With Visual Impairments Including Blindness","authors":"Rachel Anne Schles, Tessa McCarthy","doi":"10.1177/07419325221083656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prevalence of students with visual impairments (VI) varies across the United States, yet no analysis exists on how individual state factors may correlate with the number of students receiving services. This study presents the results of an analysis of variations in eligibility criteria for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) category “visual impairments including blindness” and a series of statistical models exploring correlations between prevalence rates for students with VI and state-level variables during the 2016–2017 and 2017–2018 school years. Multiple regression analyses indicated that requiring specific assessments as part of the eligibility process may strongly correlate to states’ number of students with visual impairments reported in Child Count and explain the degree of difference between Child Count and total population reports. Child Count prevalence rates were higher in states that housed a preparation program for teachers of students with visual impairments. Implications for policy makers, administrators, and practitioners were discussed.","PeriodicalId":48042,"journal":{"name":"Remedial and Special Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"102 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remedial and Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325221083656","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The prevalence of students with visual impairments (VI) varies across the United States, yet no analysis exists on how individual state factors may correlate with the number of students receiving services. This study presents the results of an analysis of variations in eligibility criteria for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) category “visual impairments including blindness” and a series of statistical models exploring correlations between prevalence rates for students with VI and state-level variables during the 2016–2017 and 2017–2018 school years. Multiple regression analyses indicated that requiring specific assessments as part of the eligibility process may strongly correlate to states’ number of students with visual impairments reported in Child Count and explain the degree of difference between Child Count and total population reports. Child Count prevalence rates were higher in states that housed a preparation program for teachers of students with visual impairments. Implications for policy makers, administrators, and practitioners were discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索各州对包括失明在内的视觉障碍学生的患病率和资格标准的差异
美国各地有视觉障碍(VI)的学生的患病率各不相同,但没有分析个人状态因素如何与接受服务的学生人数相关。本研究对《残疾人教育改善法》(IDEA)类别“包括失明在内的视觉障碍”的资格标准的变化进行了分析,并建立了一系列统计模型,探讨了2016-2017学年和2017-2018学年VI学生的患病率与州级变量之间的相关性。多元回归分析表明,要求将特定评估作为资格过程的一部分,可能与各州在儿童计数中报告的视觉障碍学生人数密切相关,并解释了儿童计数和总人口报告之间的差异程度。在为视力障碍学生的教师提供准备项目的州,儿童计数的流行率更高。讨论了对政策制定者、行政人员和从业人员的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Remedial and Special Education
Remedial and Special Education EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Remedial and Special Education (RASE) is devoted to the discussion of issues involving the education of persons for whom typical instruction is not effective. Emphasis is on the interpretation of research literature and recommendations for the practice of remedial and special education. Appropriate topics include, but are not limited to, definition, identification, assessment, characteristics, management, and instruction of underachieving and exceptional children, youth, and adults; related services; family involvement; service delivery systems; legislation; litigation; and professional standards and training.
期刊最新文献
Life After High School: The Employment Experiences of Autistic Young Adults Implications of What Works Clearinghouse Guidelines on Single-Case Design: An Investigation of Empty Training Phases Grade Retention: The Role of Speech and Language Disorders, Race and Ethnicity, Sex, Socioeconomic Status, Special Education, and Bilingualism Do I Belong Yet? The Relationship Between Special Education, In-School Suspension, Belonging, and Engagement Participation in Social and Leisure Activities After High School for Autistic Young Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1