{"title":"Iodine Electric Propulsion System Thrust Validation: From Numerical Modeling to In-Space Testing","authors":"Oliver Jia-Richards, T. Lafleur","doi":"10.2514/1.b39198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we complete a full-thrust audit of an iodine-based gridded ion thruster. Prior results have demonstrated excellent agreement between indirect and direct laboratory thrust estimates. Here, thrust estimates from numerical modeling, indirect laboratory testing from diagnostic probes and propulsion system telemetry, indirect in-space testing from onboard propulsion system telemetry, and direct in-space testing by analyzing orbital maneuvers are compared to demonstrate consistency between the four methods and complete the thrust audit. Results from recent in-space testing of the iodine-based thruster demonstrate that thrust estimates from all four methods agree to within three standard deviations of uncertainty for the 11 maneuvers studied. This thrust audit represents a critical step toward improving the understanding and technological maturity of iodine-based gridded ion thrusters for future mission applications, and it demonstrates the utility of recently developed in-space thrust inference techniques for analyzing low-thrust maneuvers.","PeriodicalId":16903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Propulsion and Power","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Propulsion and Power","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b39198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this paper, we complete a full-thrust audit of an iodine-based gridded ion thruster. Prior results have demonstrated excellent agreement between indirect and direct laboratory thrust estimates. Here, thrust estimates from numerical modeling, indirect laboratory testing from diagnostic probes and propulsion system telemetry, indirect in-space testing from onboard propulsion system telemetry, and direct in-space testing by analyzing orbital maneuvers are compared to demonstrate consistency between the four methods and complete the thrust audit. Results from recent in-space testing of the iodine-based thruster demonstrate that thrust estimates from all four methods agree to within three standard deviations of uncertainty for the 11 maneuvers studied. This thrust audit represents a critical step toward improving the understanding and technological maturity of iodine-based gridded ion thrusters for future mission applications, and it demonstrates the utility of recently developed in-space thrust inference techniques for analyzing low-thrust maneuvers.
期刊介绍:
This Journal is devoted to the advancement of the science and technology of aerospace propulsion and power through the dissemination of original archival papers contributing to advancements in airbreathing, electric, and advanced propulsion; solid and liquid rockets; fuels and propellants; power generation and conversion for aerospace vehicles; and the application of aerospace science and technology to terrestrial energy devices and systems. It is intended to provide readers of the Journal, with primary interests in propulsion and power, access to papers spanning the range from research through development to applications. Papers in these disciplines and the sciences of combustion, fluid mechanics, and solid mechanics as directly related to propulsion and power are solicited.