Development and Presentation of an Ethical Framework for Health and Medical Apps

Pinar Tokgöz, Hannah Eger, Sarah Sharlyn Funke, Alexander Gutjar, T. Nguyen-Thi, C. Dockweiler
{"title":"Development and Presentation of an Ethical Framework for Health and Medical Apps","authors":"Pinar Tokgöz, Hannah Eger, Sarah Sharlyn Funke, Alexander Gutjar, T. Nguyen-Thi, C. Dockweiler","doi":"10.29086/JISFTEH.7.E15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ubiquity of mobile applications makes it difficult to weigh up opportunities and potential risks. One significant aspect of an ethical assessment regarding the development and use of health and medical apps is the lack of clear and consistent guidelines and measures of value. Aim: The aim of this paper was to identify the main ethical determinants associated in the context of health and medical apps and develop a framework for ethical reflection. Methods: A systematic literature search in the database PubMed was undertaken and the journal Biomed Central Medical Ethics was hand searched and 32 met the review criteria. On this basis of the review an interview guide was developed and five purposively selected experts on the field of payers, science, consumers, medical ethics and society were interviewed regarding health and medical apps. Results: There is a lack of consistent and clear guidelines regarding the use of health and medical apps in literature. Indeed, findings refer to established biomedical principles. The interviews identified that several insecurities related to legal and regulatory issues are common. On the other hand, many advantages of the use of health and medical apps have been pointed out by experts. Conclusion: Debates on ethics and the use of health and medical apps should play a significant role in public discussion. Ethical endpoints cannot be considered isolated from each other, and must be regarded as a complex network of aspects connected with each other. Further research should concentrate on the development of consistent guidelines and a framework for reflection of occurring ethical concerns.","PeriodicalId":93212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Society for Telemedicine and eHealth","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Society for Telemedicine and eHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29086/JISFTEH.7.E15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The ubiquity of mobile applications makes it difficult to weigh up opportunities and potential risks. One significant aspect of an ethical assessment regarding the development and use of health and medical apps is the lack of clear and consistent guidelines and measures of value. Aim: The aim of this paper was to identify the main ethical determinants associated in the context of health and medical apps and develop a framework for ethical reflection. Methods: A systematic literature search in the database PubMed was undertaken and the journal Biomed Central Medical Ethics was hand searched and 32 met the review criteria. On this basis of the review an interview guide was developed and five purposively selected experts on the field of payers, science, consumers, medical ethics and society were interviewed regarding health and medical apps. Results: There is a lack of consistent and clear guidelines regarding the use of health and medical apps in literature. Indeed, findings refer to established biomedical principles. The interviews identified that several insecurities related to legal and regulatory issues are common. On the other hand, many advantages of the use of health and medical apps have been pointed out by experts. Conclusion: Debates on ethics and the use of health and medical apps should play a significant role in public discussion. Ethical endpoints cannot be considered isolated from each other, and must be regarded as a complex network of aspects connected with each other. Further research should concentrate on the development of consistent guidelines and a framework for reflection of occurring ethical concerns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康和医疗应用程序伦理框架的开发和演示
移动应用程序的普遍性使得很难权衡机会和潜在风险。关于健康和医疗应用程序的开发和使用的道德评估的一个重要方面是缺乏明确和一致的指导方针和价值衡量标准。目的:本文的目的是确定与健康和医疗应用程序相关的主要伦理决定因素,并制定伦理反思框架。方法:在PubMed数据库中进行系统的文献检索,并手动检索《生物医学中心医学伦理学》杂志,其中32篇符合审查标准。在审查的基础上,制定了一份采访指南,并就健康和医疗应用程序采访了付款人、科学、消费者、医学伦理和社会领域的五位有针对性的专家。结果:文献中缺乏关于健康和医疗应用程序使用的一致和明确的指南。事实上,这些发现引用了既定的生物医学原理。采访发现,与法律和监管问题有关的一些不安全感很常见。另一方面,专家们指出了使用健康和医疗应用程序的许多优势。结论:关于道德以及健康和医疗应用程序使用的辩论应该在公众讨论中发挥重要作用。伦理终点不能被视为相互隔离,必须被视为一个相互连接的复杂方面网络。进一步的研究应集中于制定一致的指导方针和框架,以反映正在发生的伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unhelpful Helplines: Inaccessibility for the Deaf Patients Perceptions on Teledermatology Through Video-consulting During the Covid19-pandemic: Report on a Belgian Cohort COVID-19 and eHealth: A Promise or Peril Paradox? Scaling Up Digital Health In Conflict Countries COVID-19 as a Catalyst for Telehealth Growth in India: Some Insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1