The Blame Game: Public Outcry and Terrorism within and Exported from the Sanctioned State

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Foreign Policy Analysis Pub Date : 2022-12-08 DOI:10.1093/fpa/orac029
Nazli Avdan, B. Early, Ryan Yu-Lin Liou, Amanda M. Murdie, Dursun Peksen
{"title":"The Blame Game: Public Outcry and Terrorism within and Exported from the Sanctioned State","authors":"Nazli Avdan, B. Early, Ryan Yu-Lin Liou, Amanda M. Murdie, Dursun Peksen","doi":"10.1093/fpa/orac029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n What effects do economic sanctions have on the volume of domestic terrorism within target states and transnational terrorism directed toward Americans by targeted nationals? In this article, we theorize that sanctions imposed by the United States increase the likelihood of domestic and transnational terrorism, but the suggested effect is conditioned by the freedom of expression in sanctioned states. When media freedom and other information freedoms are high, we posit that citizens are more likely to direct their grievances against their own government, leading to an increase in domestic terrorism as time under economic sanction increases. When freedom of expression is low, however, leaders of sanctioned states may be able to exploit sanctions to channel hostility away from the home regime via transnational terrorism exported from the sanctioned state. Results from a time-series, cross-national data analysis lend support to our argument on domestic terrorism in the sanctioned state while showing no statistical support for the hypothesis concerning transnational terrorism.","PeriodicalId":46954,"journal":{"name":"Foreign Policy Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foreign Policy Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orac029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What effects do economic sanctions have on the volume of domestic terrorism within target states and transnational terrorism directed toward Americans by targeted nationals? In this article, we theorize that sanctions imposed by the United States increase the likelihood of domestic and transnational terrorism, but the suggested effect is conditioned by the freedom of expression in sanctioned states. When media freedom and other information freedoms are high, we posit that citizens are more likely to direct their grievances against their own government, leading to an increase in domestic terrorism as time under economic sanction increases. When freedom of expression is low, however, leaders of sanctioned states may be able to exploit sanctions to channel hostility away from the home regime via transnational terrorism exported from the sanctioned state. Results from a time-series, cross-national data analysis lend support to our argument on domestic terrorism in the sanctioned state while showing no statistical support for the hypothesis concerning transnational terrorism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
责任游戏:公众的呐喊与制裁国内外的恐怖主义
经济制裁对目标国国内恐怖主义和目标国民针对美国人的跨国恐怖主义的数量有什么影响?在这篇文章中,我们认为美国实施的制裁增加了国内和跨国恐怖主义的可能性,但所建议的效果是受制裁国家言论自由的制约。当媒体自由和其他信息自由度很高时,我们认为公民更有可能将他们的不满指向自己的政府,随着经济制裁时间的增加,导致国内恐怖主义的增加。然而,当言论自由度较低时,受制裁国家的领导人可能能够利用制裁,通过受制裁国家输出的跨国恐怖主义,将敌意从本国政权转移出去。跨国家时间序列数据分析的结果支持了我们关于受制裁国家国内恐怖主义的论点,但没有显示出对跨国恐怖主义假设的统计支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foreign Policy Analysis
Foreign Policy Analysis INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Reflecting the diverse, comparative and multidisciplinary nature of the field, Foreign Policy Analysis provides an open forum for research publication that enhances the communication of concepts and ideas across theoretical, methodological, geographical and disciplinary boundaries. By emphasizing accessibility of content for scholars of all perspectives and approaches in the editorial and review process, Foreign Policy Analysis serves as a source for efforts at theoretical and methodological integration and deepening the conceptual debates throughout this rich and complex academic research tradition. Foreign policy analysis, as a field of study, is characterized by its actor-specific focus. The underlying, often implicit argument is that the source of international politics and change in international politics is human beings, acting individually or in groups. In the simplest terms, foreign policy analysis is the study of the process, effects, causes or outputs of foreign policy decision-making in either a comparative or case-specific manner.
期刊最新文献
Lobbying Sanctions: Data from the European Union Reliable Contributors? Leadership Turnover, Regime Type, and Commitments to Peacekeeping The Role of Political Leaders’ Emotions in Shaping International Rivalries: The Case of Former Bolivian President Evo Morales Particularized Preferences for Civilian Protection? A Survey Experiment The Evolution of Monitoring: Evidence from Text Analysis of Election Monitoring Reports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1