Lung function assessment in preschool children with symptoms of asthma: A preliminary study

S. Rajapakse, S. Agampodi, D. Yasaratne, Janith Chandrakumara, L. Amarasiri
{"title":"Lung function assessment in preschool children with symptoms of asthma: A preliminary study","authors":"S. Rajapakse, S. Agampodi, D. Yasaratne, Janith Chandrakumara, L. Amarasiri","doi":"10.4038/amj.v17i2.7780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Asthma causes a significant disease burden in children and it is objectively diagnosed by demonstration of reversible airway obstruction. However, objective diagnosis of airway obstruction in preschool children with asthma symptoms is not frequently practised in Sri Lanka.Methodology: This study was a descriptive cross-sectional preliminary study conducted in a convenience sample of 11 consecutive children aged 3-6 years presenting with symptoms of asthma. Asthma Control Test (ACT) was used to assess symptom control. Lung function assessment was carried out using spirometry and impulse oscillometry (IOS) according to European Respiratory Society and American Thoracic Society guidelines. Airway obstruction cut-off was considered as the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1): forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio less than 0.9.Results: The study sample consisted of 4 boys and 7 girls. Nine participants had good control of asthma symptoms (ACT>19). Only three participants performed spirometry in an acceptable and reproducible manner and two of them demonstrated evidence of airway obstruction. FVC less than 0.8 was noted in two participants probably attributable to poor effort (pseudo-restriction). Significant bronchodilator reversibility was not demonstrable in any patient, and two participants had reduced FEV1:FVC ratio following administration of beta-2-agonists probably due to paradoxical bronchoconstriction or improvement of FVC.IOS assessment was completed successfully by seven children. Increased R5-20 was detected in 3 participants and increased resonance frequency in another two children, suggesting probable peripheral airway involvement.Conclusion: Airway obstruction in preschool children could be assessed using spirometry and IOS. IOS is more feasible in preschool children.","PeriodicalId":30600,"journal":{"name":"Anuradhapura Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuradhapura Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/amj.v17i2.7780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Asthma causes a significant disease burden in children and it is objectively diagnosed by demonstration of reversible airway obstruction. However, objective diagnosis of airway obstruction in preschool children with asthma symptoms is not frequently practised in Sri Lanka.Methodology: This study was a descriptive cross-sectional preliminary study conducted in a convenience sample of 11 consecutive children aged 3-6 years presenting with symptoms of asthma. Asthma Control Test (ACT) was used to assess symptom control. Lung function assessment was carried out using spirometry and impulse oscillometry (IOS) according to European Respiratory Society and American Thoracic Society guidelines. Airway obstruction cut-off was considered as the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1): forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio less than 0.9.Results: The study sample consisted of 4 boys and 7 girls. Nine participants had good control of asthma symptoms (ACT>19). Only three participants performed spirometry in an acceptable and reproducible manner and two of them demonstrated evidence of airway obstruction. FVC less than 0.8 was noted in two participants probably attributable to poor effort (pseudo-restriction). Significant bronchodilator reversibility was not demonstrable in any patient, and two participants had reduced FEV1:FVC ratio following administration of beta-2-agonists probably due to paradoxical bronchoconstriction or improvement of FVC.IOS assessment was completed successfully by seven children. Increased R5-20 was detected in 3 participants and increased resonance frequency in another two children, suggesting probable peripheral airway involvement.Conclusion: Airway obstruction in preschool children could be assessed using spirometry and IOS. IOS is more feasible in preschool children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有哮喘症状的学龄前儿童肺功能评估的初步研究
背景:哮喘在儿童中造成了严重的疾病负担,通过可逆性气道阻塞的表现可以客观地诊断哮喘。然而,在斯里兰卡,对有哮喘症状的学龄前儿童的气道阻塞进行客观诊断并不常见。方法:本研究是一项描述性的横断面初步研究,对11名连续出现哮喘症状的3-6岁儿童进行了方便的抽样。哮喘控制测试(ACT)用于评估症状控制。根据欧洲呼吸学会和美国胸科学会指南,使用肺活量测定法和脉冲振荡法(IOS)进行肺功能评估。气道阻塞阻断被认为是第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1):用力肺活量(FVC)比小于0.9。结果:研究样本包括4名男孩和7名女孩。9名参与者的哮喘症状得到了良好的控制(ACT>19)。只有三名参与者以可接受和可重复的方式进行了肺活量测定,其中两人证明了气道阻塞的证据。两名参与者的FVC低于0.8,可能是由于努力不足(伪限制)。在任何患者中都没有显示出显著的支气管扩张剂可逆性,两名参与者在服用β-2-激动剂后FEV1:FVC比率降低,这可能是由于反常的支气管收缩或FVC的改善。七名儿童成功完成了IOS评估。在3名参与者中检测到R5-20增加,在另外两名儿童中检测到共振频率增加,这表明可能涉及外周气道。结论:应用肺活量测定法和IOS可对学龄前儿童气道阻塞进行评估。IOS在学龄前儿童中更可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Cerebellar stroke in a young female associated with elevated homocysteine levels and heterozygous MTHFR C677T gene:  A case report. A rare case of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus presenting as acute myopericarditis with bilateral pleural effusions. Efficacy of Reverse Osmosis in Reducing Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown Etiology in Sri Lanka: A Narrative Review Factors associated with initiation of tobacco smoking among schooling adolescents in the age group of 13 – 15 years in the Kandy district, Sri Lanka Granulomatosis with polyangiitis presenting as acute ischemic stroke- A case of an unusual presentation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1