Psychologists’ perceptions of assessing and treating trauma-exposed clients

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Australian Psychologist Pub Date : 2022-10-05 DOI:10.1080/00050067.2022.2120381
Shufan Wang, L. Schramm, E. Berger
{"title":"Psychologists’ perceptions of assessing and treating trauma-exposed clients","authors":"Shufan Wang, L. Schramm, E. Berger","doi":"10.1080/00050067.2022.2120381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective Psychologists are primary care professionals responsible for providing treatment to people exposed to trauma. However, there has been limited research exploring psychologists’ perceptions of their practice and trauma-informed care when treating people exposed to trauma. The current study aimed to investigate: 1) psychologists’ perceptions of assessing and treating trauma-exposed clients; and 2) psychologists’ perceptions of trauma-informed practice and their need for further training in this area. Method Surveys were completed by 99 psychologists, and the data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Psychologists reported the importance of further trauma-related training and showed an inconsistent understanding of trauma-informed practice. Conclusions Changes in tertiary education for psychologists were recommended to assist future psychologists to develop competency and confidence in assessing and treating trauma-exposed clients. It was also recommended that psychologists with insufficient knowledge in this field to undertake further training in this area. Key Points What is already known about this topic: (1) Psychologists are primary care professionals responsible for diagnosing and treating clients exposed to trauma. (2) Working with trauma-exposed clients presents a burden for psychologists in terms of their mental health and wellbeing. (3) There is limited Australian and international research concerning the experiences and needs of psychologists when assessing and treating trauma-exposed clients. What this topic adds: (1) This study demonstrated Australian psychologists’ mixed knowledge and confidence when assessing and treating clients exposed to trauma. (2) Mixed understanding of trauma-informed care and ways to implement trauma-informed practice were also presented. (3) More professional development for some psychologists is recommended regarding assessing and treating trauma, and regarding trauma-informed practice.","PeriodicalId":47679,"journal":{"name":"Australian Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2022.2120381","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Psychologists are primary care professionals responsible for providing treatment to people exposed to trauma. However, there has been limited research exploring psychologists’ perceptions of their practice and trauma-informed care when treating people exposed to trauma. The current study aimed to investigate: 1) psychologists’ perceptions of assessing and treating trauma-exposed clients; and 2) psychologists’ perceptions of trauma-informed practice and their need for further training in this area. Method Surveys were completed by 99 psychologists, and the data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Psychologists reported the importance of further trauma-related training and showed an inconsistent understanding of trauma-informed practice. Conclusions Changes in tertiary education for psychologists were recommended to assist future psychologists to develop competency and confidence in assessing and treating trauma-exposed clients. It was also recommended that psychologists with insufficient knowledge in this field to undertake further training in this area. Key Points What is already known about this topic: (1) Psychologists are primary care professionals responsible for diagnosing and treating clients exposed to trauma. (2) Working with trauma-exposed clients presents a burden for psychologists in terms of their mental health and wellbeing. (3) There is limited Australian and international research concerning the experiences and needs of psychologists when assessing and treating trauma-exposed clients. What this topic adds: (1) This study demonstrated Australian psychologists’ mixed knowledge and confidence when assessing and treating clients exposed to trauma. (2) Mixed understanding of trauma-informed care and ways to implement trauma-informed practice were also presented. (3) More professional development for some psychologists is recommended regarding assessing and treating trauma, and regarding trauma-informed practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理学家对评估和治疗创伤暴露客户的看法
摘要目的心理学家是负责为遭受创伤的人提供治疗的初级保健专业人员。然而,在治疗暴露于创伤的人时,探索心理学家对其实践和创伤知情护理的看法的研究有限。本研究旨在调查:1)心理学家对评估和治疗创伤暴露客户的看法;2)心理学家对创伤知情实践的看法以及他们在这一领域进一步培训的必要性。方法对99名心理学家进行问卷调查,并运用主题分析法对调查数据进行分析。结果心理学家报告了进一步创伤相关培训的重要性,并对创伤知情实践的理解不一致。结论建议改变心理学家的高等教育,以帮助未来的心理学家培养评估和治疗创伤暴露客户的能力和信心。还建议在这一领域知识不足的心理学家进行这一领域的进一步培训。要点关于这个话题已经知道的内容:(1)心理学家是负责诊断和治疗遭受创伤的客户的初级保健专业人员。(2) 与遭受创伤的客户合作对心理学家的心理健康和幸福感来说是一种负担。(3) 澳大利亚和国际上关于心理学家在评估和治疗创伤暴露客户时的经验和需求的研究有限。该主题补充道:(1)这项研究表明,澳大利亚心理学家在评估和治疗遭受创伤的客户时,知识和信心混杂。(2) 还介绍了对创伤知情护理的混合理解以及实施创伤知情实践的方法。(3) 建议一些心理学家在评估和治疗创伤以及创伤知情实践方面进行更专业的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Psychologist
Australian Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Australian Psychologist is the official applied practice and public policy journal of the Australian Psychological Society. As such, the journal solicits articles covering current issues in psychology, the science and practice of psychology, and psychology"s contribution to public policy, with particular emphasis on the Australian context. Periodically, Australian Psychological Society documents, including but not limited to, position papers, reports of the Society, ethics information, surveys of the membership, announcements, and selected award addresses may appear in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Co-sleeping fathers’ perceptions of sleep quality with intentional and unintentional co-sleeping Psychometric examination of the Japanese version of Perth Emotion Regulation Competency Inventory Male-friendly counselling for young men: a thematic analysis of client and caregiver experiences of Menslink counselling Climate change and mental health: postgraduate psychology student and program coordinator perspectives from Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand The Westerman Aboriginal Symptom Checklist – Youth Version: national data from a clinical sample of Aboriginal youth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1