Border security and the digitalisation of sovereignty: insights from EU borderwork

IF 2.7 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES European Security Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/09662839.2022.2101884
Bruno Oliveira Martins, Kristoffer Lidén, Maria Gabrielsen Jumbert
{"title":"Border security and the digitalisation of sovereignty: insights from EU borderwork","authors":"Bruno Oliveira Martins, Kristoffer Lidén, Maria Gabrielsen Jumbert","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2022.2101884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The European Union’s effort at controlling its external borders is an endeavour that increasingly relies on digital systems: from tools for information gathering and surveillance to systems for communicating between different agencies and across member states. This makes EU borders a key site for the politics of “digital sovereignty” – of controlling digital data, software and infrastructures. In this article, we propose a new understanding of how the concepts of digital and sovereignty interplay: sovereignty by digital means, sovereignty of the digital, and sovereignty over the digital. We do it by analysing three key manifestations within the EU’s borderwork: firstly, the expansion of EURODAC to include facial biometric data; secondly, the creation of the (future) shared Biometric Matching System (sBMS); and thirdly, the EU-funded West Africa Police Information System (WAPIS). These databases and systems exemplify three transformations of EU borderwork that invoke different dimensions of digital sovereignty: expansion of techniques for governing migration; interoperability of EU databases facilitating the internalisation of borders through domestic policing; and extra-territorialization of borderwork beyond the geographic limits of the EU.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Security","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2101884","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

ABSTRACT The European Union’s effort at controlling its external borders is an endeavour that increasingly relies on digital systems: from tools for information gathering and surveillance to systems for communicating between different agencies and across member states. This makes EU borders a key site for the politics of “digital sovereignty” – of controlling digital data, software and infrastructures. In this article, we propose a new understanding of how the concepts of digital and sovereignty interplay: sovereignty by digital means, sovereignty of the digital, and sovereignty over the digital. We do it by analysing three key manifestations within the EU’s borderwork: firstly, the expansion of EURODAC to include facial biometric data; secondly, the creation of the (future) shared Biometric Matching System (sBMS); and thirdly, the EU-funded West Africa Police Information System (WAPIS). These databases and systems exemplify three transformations of EU borderwork that invoke different dimensions of digital sovereignty: expansion of techniques for governing migration; interoperability of EU databases facilitating the internalisation of borders through domestic policing; and extra-territorialization of borderwork beyond the geographic limits of the EU.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边境安全与主权数字化:来自欧盟边境工作的见解
摘要欧盟控制外部边界的努力越来越依赖数字系统:从信息收集和监控工具到不同机构之间和成员国之间的通信系统。这使得欧盟边界成为“数字主权”政治的关键场所,即控制数字数据、软件和基础设施。在这篇文章中,我们对数字和主权的概念如何相互作用提出了新的理解:通过数字手段的主权、数字的主权和对数字的主权。我们通过分析欧盟边界工作中的三个关键表现来做到这一点:首先,将EURODAC扩展到包括面部生物特征数据;其次,创建(未来)共享的生物特征匹配系统(sBMS);第三,欧盟资助的西非警察信息系统。这些数据库和系统举例说明了欧盟边界工作的三种转变,它们唤起了数字主权的不同维度:移民管理技术的扩展;欧盟数据库的互操作性,通过国内治安促进边界内部化;以及超出欧盟地理范围的边境工作的域外化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Security
European Security Multiple-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
The European Union's use of contractors in security and defence: blazing its own path of institutional change? Measuring the effectiveness of counter-disinformation strategies in the Czech security forces Diplomacy beyond the state: Ukrainian think tank experts as wartime diplomacy actors What can European security architecture look like in the wake of Russia’s war on Ukraine? New Russian migrants in Estonia: performative agency in insecure times
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1