Can Identity Theory Improve Survey Design?

IF 1.6 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics Pub Date : 2022-06-23 DOI:10.1017/aae.2022.17
Logan L. Britton, F. Norwood
{"title":"Can Identity Theory Improve Survey Design?","authors":"Logan L. Britton, F. Norwood","doi":"10.1017/aae.2022.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Question effects are important when designing and interpreting surveys. Question responses are influenced by preceding questions through ordering effects. Identity Theory is employed to explain why some ordering effects exist. A conceptual model predicts respondents will display identity inertia, where the identity cued in one question will be expressed in subsequent questions regardless of whether those questions cue that identity. Lower amounts of identity inertia are found compared to habitual inertia, where respondents tend to give similar answers to previous questions. The magnitude of both inertias is small, suggesting they are only minor obstacles to survey design.","PeriodicalId":14970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics","volume":"54 1","pages":"422 - 439"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2022.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Question effects are important when designing and interpreting surveys. Question responses are influenced by preceding questions through ordering effects. Identity Theory is employed to explain why some ordering effects exist. A conceptual model predicts respondents will display identity inertia, where the identity cued in one question will be expressed in subsequent questions regardless of whether those questions cue that identity. Lower amounts of identity inertia are found compared to habitual inertia, where respondents tend to give similar answers to previous questions. The magnitude of both inertias is small, suggesting they are only minor obstacles to survey design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
身份理论能改善勘察设计吗?
摘要问题效应在设计和解释调查时很重要。问题回答通过排序效应受到前面问题的影响。同一性理论被用来解释为什么存在一些有序效应。概念模型预测受访者将表现出身份惯性,在一个问题中暗示的身份将在随后的问题中表达,无论这些问题是否暗示该身份。与习惯性惯性相比,身份惯性的数量更低,习惯性惯性中受访者倾向于对之前的问题给出类似的答案。这两种惯性的大小都很小,这表明它们只是勘测设计的小障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, the Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics is a forum for creative and scholarly work in agricultural economics and related areas. Contributions on methodology and applications in business, extension, research, and teaching phases of agricultural and applied economics are equally encouraged. As of 2015 (Vol 47), articles are published on an open access basis.
期刊最新文献
Consumer Willingness to Pay for Visually Imperfect Organic Kale Assessing Peer Influence on Farmers’ Climate Adaptations: An Experimental Adoption of Index Insurance and Savings in Uzbekistan How Do Risk Preferences Affect Golf Course Superintendents’ Adoption of Precision Irrigation Technologies? Implications from Prospect Theory – ERRATUM The Drivers of U.S. Meat Goat Prices: A Hedonic Analysis of Goat Auction Data The Alternative Livestock Revolution: Prospects for Consumer Acceptance of Plant-based and Cultured Meat in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1