An exploration of charity sport event donor perceptions of online peer-to-peer fundraising mechanisms

IF 3.7 1区 教育学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Sport Management Review Pub Date : 2022-03-25 DOI:10.1080/14413523.2021.1993645
{"title":"An exploration of charity sport event donor perceptions of online peer-to-peer fundraising mechanisms","authors":"Kevin Filo, N. Hookway, M. Wade, C. Palmer","doi":"10.1080/14413523.2021.1993645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The employment of online peer-to-peer fundraising has become a critical aspect of the charity sport event experience. Charity sport event participants are encouraged and often requiredto fundraise as part of their involvement. Within this fundraising, participants increasingly use online peer-to-peer fundraising to solicit donations. The current research examines online peer-to-peer fundraising from the perspective of charity sport event donors. Guided by the diffusion of innovation theory and sociological approaches to technology, semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals who had made an online donation in support of a charity sport event participant in the previous 12 months (N= 24). Four themes emerged from the interviews: technological detachment, technology eases pressure, saturated market, and cause integrity. These themes highlight concerns with the relative advantage inherent to online peer-to-peer fundraising as well as the importance of addressing technological adoption as a social process between users and technologies. The findings provide implications for event managers and charity managers to empower fundraisers to engage further with prospective donors through both online and in-person communication. HIGHLIGHTS Online peer-to-peer fundraising within charity sport events is investigated. Charity sport event donor perspectives are solicited through semi-structured interviews. Four themes emerged from the data suggesting some receptivity along with apprehensions towards the number of solicitations and causes. Charity sport event managers should empower and educate fundraisers and donors.","PeriodicalId":48057,"journal":{"name":"Sport Management Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"847 - 870"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2021.1993645","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT The employment of online peer-to-peer fundraising has become a critical aspect of the charity sport event experience. Charity sport event participants are encouraged and often requiredto fundraise as part of their involvement. Within this fundraising, participants increasingly use online peer-to-peer fundraising to solicit donations. The current research examines online peer-to-peer fundraising from the perspective of charity sport event donors. Guided by the diffusion of innovation theory and sociological approaches to technology, semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals who had made an online donation in support of a charity sport event participant in the previous 12 months (N= 24). Four themes emerged from the interviews: technological detachment, technology eases pressure, saturated market, and cause integrity. These themes highlight concerns with the relative advantage inherent to online peer-to-peer fundraising as well as the importance of addressing technological adoption as a social process between users and technologies. The findings provide implications for event managers and charity managers to empower fundraisers to engage further with prospective donors through both online and in-person communication. HIGHLIGHTS Online peer-to-peer fundraising within charity sport events is investigated. Charity sport event donor perspectives are solicited through semi-structured interviews. Four themes emerged from the data suggesting some receptivity along with apprehensions towards the number of solicitations and causes. Charity sport event managers should empower and educate fundraisers and donors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慈善体育赛事捐赠者对在线对等筹款机制的看法探讨
摘要在线对等筹款已成为慈善体育赛事体验的一个重要方面。慈善体育活动参与者受到鼓励,并且经常被要求筹集资金作为他们参与的一部分。在这次筹款活动中,参与者越来越多地使用在线对等筹款来募集捐款。目前的研究从慈善体育赛事捐赠者的角度考察了在线对等筹款。在创新理论和技术社会学方法的传播指导下,对在过去12个月内为支持慈善体育活动参与者而进行在线捐款的个人进行了半结构化访谈(N=24)。采访中出现了四个主题:技术超然、技术缓解压力、市场饱和和事业诚信。这些主题突出了人们对在线对等筹款固有的相对优势的担忧,以及将技术采用作为用户和技术之间的社会过程的重要性。研究结果为活动经理和慈善机构经理提供了启示,使筹款人能够通过在线和面对面交流与潜在捐赠者进一步接触。亮点对慈善体育赛事中的在线对等筹款进行了调查。通过半结构化访谈征求慈善体育赛事捐赠者的意见。数据中出现了四个主题,表明了一些可接受性,以及对征集数量和原因的担忧。慈善体育活动的管理者应该赋予筹款人和捐赠者权力并对他们进行教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Sport Management Review is published as a service to sport industries worldwide. It is a multidisciplinary journal concerned with the management, marketing, and governance of sport at all levels and in all its manifestations -- whether as an entertainment, a recreation, or an occupation. The journal encourages collaboration between scholars and practitioners. It welcomes submissions reporting research, new applications, advances in theory, and case studies. The language of publication is English. Submissions are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Pollination, cultivation, and perennialization: creating the amateur logic in collegiate sport Public perception of esports: an examination of esports image and genre differences Leadership development: relationality and temporality in professional sport Musical congruity in sports: enhancing team branding in esports and traditional sports Market demand for metaverse-based sporting events: a mixed-methods approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1