Evaluation of Czech Non-Chemical Vocational School Chemistry Textbooks’ Text Difficulty

IF 0.7 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.2478/cdem-2021-0008
M. Rusek, L. Vosyková
{"title":"Evaluation of Czech Non-Chemical Vocational School Chemistry Textbooks’ Text Difficulty","authors":"M. Rusek, L. Vosyková","doi":"10.2478/cdem-2021-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The paper follows the first author's continuous work on chemistry textbook analysis. In the previous paper published in CERP, attention was given to the procedure and results for analysing text-difficulty in lower-secondary chemistry textbooks in Czechia. In this paper, attention was given to non-chemical vocational school chemistry textbooks. They are intended for the most numerous group of upper-secondary students. The goal of the study was to assess the to what extent could students read the textbook texts on their own with appropriate understanding. Therefore, only the textual component was evaluated. The same method (Nestler-Prucha-Pluskal) as in the previous paper was used to analyse the textbooks’ text-difficulty (readability). The results show there are two books which are suitable for students’ own learning. However, there are four textbooks which contain text of high difficulty, including too many scientific terms that they are suitable as teacher's guide through terms rather than student's textbooks. The analysis may serve teachers with their textbook choice as well as researchers who operate in the same field who can easily adopt the methodology and compare results.","PeriodicalId":41079,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology","volume":"26 1","pages":"99 - 108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cdem-2021-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The paper follows the first author's continuous work on chemistry textbook analysis. In the previous paper published in CERP, attention was given to the procedure and results for analysing text-difficulty in lower-secondary chemistry textbooks in Czechia. In this paper, attention was given to non-chemical vocational school chemistry textbooks. They are intended for the most numerous group of upper-secondary students. The goal of the study was to assess the to what extent could students read the textbook texts on their own with appropriate understanding. Therefore, only the textual component was evaluated. The same method (Nestler-Prucha-Pluskal) as in the previous paper was used to analyse the textbooks’ text-difficulty (readability). The results show there are two books which are suitable for students’ own learning. However, there are four textbooks which contain text of high difficulty, including too many scientific terms that they are suitable as teacher's guide through terms rather than student's textbooks. The analysis may serve teachers with their textbook choice as well as researchers who operate in the same field who can easily adopt the methodology and compare results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捷克非化学职业学校化学教材文本难度评价
本文是继第一作者在化学教材分析方面的连续工作之后发表的。在CERP上发表的前一篇论文中,重点介绍了捷克初中化学教材文本难度分析的程序和结果。本文对非化学职业学校化学教材进行了研究。它们是为数量最多的高中生群体准备的。这项研究的目的是评估学生在多大程度上能够以适当的理解力独立阅读课本。因此,只评估了文本部分。使用与前一篇论文相同的方法(Nestler-Prucha Pluskal)来分析教科书的文本难度(可读性)。结果表明,有两本书适合学生自己学习。然而,有四本教科书包含高难度的文本,其中包括太多的科学术语,它们适合作为教师的术语指南,而不是学生的教科书。该分析可以为教师选择教科书以及在同一领域工作的研究人员提供服务,他们可以很容易地采用该方法并比较结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology
Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
“Covid-19 Shock” and Identified Benefits for Improved Pre-Service Chemistry Teacher Education Renewable Energy and Sustainable Digitalisation: Challenges for Europe Experiments Safety - The State of Art at Schools in Czechia Microwave-Aided Reactions of Aniline Derivatives with Formic Acid: Inquiry-Based Learning Experiments 2,3-Dihydro-Quinazolin-4(1H)-One as a Fluorescent Sensor for Hg2+ Ion and its Docking Studies in Cancer Treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1