The perspective of Iranian patients with multiple sclerosis on the third dose of COVID-19 vaccine.

IF 0.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Current Journal of Neurology Pub Date : 2022-07-06 DOI:10.18502/cjn.v21i3.11107
Fereshteh Ghadiri, Mohammad Ali Sahraian, Amirreza Azimi, Abdorreza Naser Moghadasi
{"title":"The perspective of Iranian patients with multiple sclerosis on the third dose of COVID-19 vaccine.","authors":"Fereshteh Ghadiri, Mohammad Ali Sahraian, Amirreza Azimi, Abdorreza Naser Moghadasi","doi":"10.18502/cjn.v21i3.11107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Now that the majority of the population has been immunized with two-dose vaccines, debates over the third booster dose have been raised. We studied the viewpoint of cases with multiple sclerosis (MS) on this matter. <b>Methods:</b> In a cross-sectional study, a google form containing questions about participants' characteristics, the history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and vaccination, and opinions on the third dose was designed. <b>Results:</b> Of 1067 responders, only 16 (1.5%) were not vaccinated at all. The most used vaccine type was Sinopharm BBIBP COVID-19 vaccine (BBIBP-CorV) (n = 1002, 93.9%). Generally, 58 (5.4%) cases were hospitalized due to COVID-19. Of those with full vaccination, 134 (13.3%) got COVID-19 infection after the second dose. Only 13 participants (1%) did not agree with the third dose, while 564 (53.0%) believed that a booster dose was needed. Of all, 488 (45.7%) declared that they did not have a final idea and would follow the instructions by the experts. A significant association was found between not receiving the first two doses and not believing in the third dose (P = 0.001). 692 patients declared their reasoning for the importance of the third dose. All the cases who thought the administered vaccine was not efficient enough had received Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV. Those who got infected after full vaccination were more uncertain about the efficacy of the vaccine [odds ratio (OR): 2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-4.2]. <b>Conclusion:</b> It seems that the majority of the Iranian patients with MS expect the authorities to administer a third booster dose, especially if scientifically validated.</p>","PeriodicalId":40077,"journal":{"name":"Current Journal of Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10082955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/cjn.v21i3.11107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Now that the majority of the population has been immunized with two-dose vaccines, debates over the third booster dose have been raised. We studied the viewpoint of cases with multiple sclerosis (MS) on this matter. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, a google form containing questions about participants' characteristics, the history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and vaccination, and opinions on the third dose was designed. Results: Of 1067 responders, only 16 (1.5%) were not vaccinated at all. The most used vaccine type was Sinopharm BBIBP COVID-19 vaccine (BBIBP-CorV) (n = 1002, 93.9%). Generally, 58 (5.4%) cases were hospitalized due to COVID-19. Of those with full vaccination, 134 (13.3%) got COVID-19 infection after the second dose. Only 13 participants (1%) did not agree with the third dose, while 564 (53.0%) believed that a booster dose was needed. Of all, 488 (45.7%) declared that they did not have a final idea and would follow the instructions by the experts. A significant association was found between not receiving the first two doses and not believing in the third dose (P = 0.001). 692 patients declared their reasoning for the importance of the third dose. All the cases who thought the administered vaccine was not efficient enough had received Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV. Those who got infected after full vaccination were more uncertain about the efficacy of the vaccine [odds ratio (OR): 2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-4.2]. Conclusion: It seems that the majority of the Iranian patients with MS expect the authorities to administer a third booster dose, especially if scientifically validated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗多发性硬化症患者对第三剂新冠肺炎疫苗的看法
背景:现在大多数人口已经接种了两剂疫苗,关于第三剂加强针的争论也随之而来。我们研究了多发性硬化症(MS)病例对这一问题的看法。方法:在一项横断面研究中,设计了一份谷歌表格,其中包含关于参与者特征、2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)感染和疫苗接种史以及对第三剂疫苗的意见等问题。结果:在1067名应答者中,只有16人(1.5%)根本没有接种疫苗。使用最多的疫苗类型是国药集团BBIBP新冠肺炎疫苗(BBIBP-CorV)(n=1002,93.9%)。总体而言,58例(5.4%)病例因新冠肺炎住院。在完全接种疫苗的人中,134人(13.3%)在接种第二剂疫苗后感染了新冠肺炎。只有13名参与者(1%)不同意第三剂,564名参与者(53.0%)认为需要加强剂。其中,488人(45.7%)表示他们没有最终想法,会听从专家的指示。不接受前两剂和不相信第三剂之间存在显著关联(P=0.001)。692名患者宣布了他们对第三剂重要性的推理。所有认为接种疫苗不够有效的病例都接种了国药集团BBIBP-CorV疫苗。那些在完全接种疫苗后感染的人对疫苗的有效性更不确定[比值比(OR):2.6,95%置信区间(CI):1.6-4.2]。结论:似乎大多数伊朗多发性硬化症患者都希望当局接种第三剂加强针,特别是在经科学验证的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Journal of Neurology
Current Journal of Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sequential changes in expression of long non-coding RNAs THRIL and MALAT1 after ischemic stroke. Tinnitus and reduced word recognition with a bilateral inferior colliculus infarction after cerebellar arteriovenous malformation embolization. Validity and reliability of the Iranian-developed version of the leisure questionnaire for people with multiple sclerosis: Psychometric properties. A study on possible risk factors for progressive supranuclear palsy in southern part of India. Anticoagulation in the management of septic cavernous sinus thrombosis secondary to rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis: A retrospective real-world experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1