New method to evaluate the polyethylene pipe-sandy soil interaction subjected to strike-slip faulting

IF 1.6 Q3 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Geotechnical Research Pub Date : 2022-11-03 DOI:10.1680/jgere.22.00010
Milad Azin, M. T. Roudsari
{"title":"New method to evaluate the polyethylene pipe-sandy soil interaction subjected to strike-slip faulting","authors":"Milad Azin, M. T. Roudsari","doi":"10.1680/jgere.22.00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pipelines are simulated in the form of a continuous beam resting on a collection of linear springs. The relationships put forth by the ASCE standard are commonly used to derive the specifications of the spring elements. Some recent studies have suggested that these relationships are accompanied by certain degree of inaccuracy. In this study, two full-scale tests were carried out on polyethylene pipes buried in sandy soil (with 120.5 and 214 mm of diameter). The pipe’s displacement along its length was recorded throughout the entire test. Then, using the ABAQUS finite element package and an optimization algorithm developed in MATLAB, a modeling approach was adopted so that the properties of the equivalent linear springs simulating the soil could be determined. This way, the displacements obtained from the experiments would have the highest level of congruence with the values derived from the numerical simulations. Using this approach, the initial stiffness and the maximum force resulted from the pipe-soil interaction have been computed and compared to the values given by the ASCE and ALA standards. The results showed that for polyethylene pipe at the condition of strike-slip faulting, these values were too smaller than the values put forth by ASCE and ALA.","PeriodicalId":44054,"journal":{"name":"Geotechnical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotechnical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgere.22.00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Pipelines are simulated in the form of a continuous beam resting on a collection of linear springs. The relationships put forth by the ASCE standard are commonly used to derive the specifications of the spring elements. Some recent studies have suggested that these relationships are accompanied by certain degree of inaccuracy. In this study, two full-scale tests were carried out on polyethylene pipes buried in sandy soil (with 120.5 and 214 mm of diameter). The pipe’s displacement along its length was recorded throughout the entire test. Then, using the ABAQUS finite element package and an optimization algorithm developed in MATLAB, a modeling approach was adopted so that the properties of the equivalent linear springs simulating the soil could be determined. This way, the displacements obtained from the experiments would have the highest level of congruence with the values derived from the numerical simulations. Using this approach, the initial stiffness and the maximum force resulted from the pipe-soil interaction have been computed and compared to the values given by the ASCE and ALA standards. The results showed that for polyethylene pipe at the condition of strike-slip faulting, these values were too smaller than the values put forth by ASCE and ALA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价走滑断层作用下聚乙烯管-砂土相互作用的新方法
管道以连续梁的形式模拟,该梁位于线性弹簧的集合上。ASCE标准提出的关系通常用于推导弹簧元件的规格。最近的一些研究表明,这些关系伴随着一定程度的不准确。在这项研究中,对埋在砂土中的聚乙烯管(120.5和214 直径mm)。在整个试验过程中,记录了管道沿其长度方向的位移。然后,使用ABAQUS有限元软件包和MATLAB中开发的优化算法,采用建模方法来确定模拟土壤的等效线性弹簧的特性。这样,从实验中获得的位移将与从数值模拟中得出的值具有最高水平的一致性。使用这种方法,计算了管道与土壤相互作用产生的初始刚度和最大力,并将其与ASCE和ALA标准给出的值进行了比较。结果表明,对于走滑断裂条件下的聚乙烯管道,这些值比ASCE和ALA提出的值小得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geotechnical Research
Geotechnical Research ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
26.30%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geotechnical Research covers the full scope of geotechnics and its related disciplines including: Soil, rock and fluid mechanics; geoenvironmental engineering; geothermal engineering; geotechnical design and construction issues; analytical and numerical methods; physical modelling; micromechanics; transportation geotechnics; engineering geology; environmental geotechnology; geochemistry; geohydrology and water management.
期刊最新文献
Theory of liquid and plastic limits for fine soils, methods of determination and outlook Slope visualization and stability study using GIS technology and UAV Retrospective evaluation of large settlement of a very soft clay Numerical modeling of skirt foundation under vertical load Consolidation and microstructural behaviour of soil treated with palm oil fuel ash-based geopolymer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1