Elimination of Discrimination Against Women & CEDAW: to What Extent is it Jus Cogens?

Yuridika Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.20473/ydk.v38i1.41663
Rr Kunti Dewi Adriane Kusumowardono
{"title":"Elimination of Discrimination Against Women & CEDAW: to What Extent is it Jus Cogens?","authors":"Rr Kunti Dewi Adriane Kusumowardono","doi":"10.20473/ydk.v38i1.41663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The international community gathers on occasion to try and achieve specific purposes, through the development of a system of guidance, norms and regulations for States to observe, commonly called international law. There have been many achievements by the international community working together for the collective interests of the States, for example through the creation of human rights law. Many international treaties have been passed that bind the States to achieve the desired collective purposes. One of these is the Convention on The Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, which departs from the fundamental norms set by the United Nations Charter as well as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights about equality between the rights of men and women for their dignity and freedom. However, several States that are party to the Convention have reserved some of the articles, and there is some controversy around it. Therefore, it is the purpose of this article to analyse whether the concept of eliminating discrimination against women and the values and norms contained in CEDAW can be categorised as Jus Cogens norms, in view of the fact that it is a manifestation of the human rights values agreed upon by the international community. Moreover, this article will also analyse the Convention’s implications on domestic norms in States with significant reservations to the Convention.","PeriodicalId":31372,"journal":{"name":"Yuridika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yuridika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i1.41663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The international community gathers on occasion to try and achieve specific purposes, through the development of a system of guidance, norms and regulations for States to observe, commonly called international law. There have been many achievements by the international community working together for the collective interests of the States, for example through the creation of human rights law. Many international treaties have been passed that bind the States to achieve the desired collective purposes. One of these is the Convention on The Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, which departs from the fundamental norms set by the United Nations Charter as well as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights about equality between the rights of men and women for their dignity and freedom. However, several States that are party to the Convention have reserved some of the articles, and there is some controversy around it. Therefore, it is the purpose of this article to analyse whether the concept of eliminating discrimination against women and the values and norms contained in CEDAW can be categorised as Jus Cogens norms, in view of the fact that it is a manifestation of the human rights values agreed upon by the international community. Moreover, this article will also analyse the Convention’s implications on domestic norms in States with significant reservations to the Convention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消除对妇女歧视和消除对妇女一切形式歧视公约:在多大程度上是正义的?
国际社会有时会聚集在一起,通过制定一套供各国遵守的指导、规范和条例,通常称为国际法,努力实现具体目的。国际社会为各国的集体利益共同努力,例如通过制定人权法,取得了许多成就。已经通过了许多国际条约,约束各国实现所期望的集体目的。其中之一是《消除对妇女一切形式歧视公约》,该公约背离了《联合国宪章》和《世界人权宣言》关于男女尊严和自由权利平等的基本准则。然而,《公约》的几个缔约国保留了一些条款,并且围绕着这些条款存在一些争议。因此,本条的目的是分析消除对妇女歧视的概念以及《消除对妇女一切形式歧视公约》所载的价值观和规范是否可以归类为Jus-Cogens规范,鉴于这是国际社会商定的人权价值观的体现。此外,本条还将分析《公约》对对《公约》有重大保留的国家的国内规范的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Responsibilities of Medical Practice through Digital Health Platforms Estimating The Exploration And Production (E&P) Industry's Rig Contract Business Owner The WTO Dispute Settlement System and How It Incentivizes Imparity Between Indonesia’s Executive and Parliament Legal Protection for Child Victims of Bullying from the Perspective of Child Protection Law Enhancing Human Rights Protections in Ukrainian Law Enforcement: National Compliance with EU Standards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1