Evaluation of biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance pattern in extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing escherichia coli strains

IF 1 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_270_21
N. Jomehzadeh, K. Ahmadi, Z. Nasiri
{"title":"Evaluation of biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance pattern in extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing escherichia coli strains","authors":"N. Jomehzadeh, K. Ahmadi, Z. Nasiri","doi":"10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_270_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli strains, especially extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains, has become a global health concern. This study was aimed to determine the frequency of blaCTX-M, blaTEM, and blaSHV genes among E. coli isolates from urinary tract infection (UTI) and evaluate their antibiotic resistance pattern. Methods: Totally 98 E. coli isolates were recovered from urine samples of UTI-diagnosed patients. Antibiotic resistance and ESBL production were evaluated by disk diffusion and combined disk methods according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The biofilm formation ability of isolates was assessed using the tube adherence method. ESBL-positive isolates were screened for blaTEM, blaCTX-M, and blaSHV genes by polymerase chain reaction. Results: Among the examined isolates, 25 (25.5%) were detected as ESBL producers and harbored at least one of the studied genes. The blaCTX-M was the predominant (44%) gene, followed by blaTEM (24%) and blaSHV (8%). The isolates revealed variable resistance levels to all antimicrobials, out of which 55.1% were conferred a high resistance rate to different antibiotic classes and considered MDR. Phenotypically, 42.85% of the isolates were biofilm formers, of which the majority (38%) formed moderate biofilms. Conclusions: This study showed that the ESBL-positive isolates were more resistant to some first-line antibiotics, and this highlights the necessity to control and monitor the prescribed antibiotics used for empirical treatment for UTI patients.","PeriodicalId":36500,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"175 - 179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_270_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli strains, especially extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains, has become a global health concern. This study was aimed to determine the frequency of blaCTX-M, blaTEM, and blaSHV genes among E. coli isolates from urinary tract infection (UTI) and evaluate their antibiotic resistance pattern. Methods: Totally 98 E. coli isolates were recovered from urine samples of UTI-diagnosed patients. Antibiotic resistance and ESBL production were evaluated by disk diffusion and combined disk methods according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The biofilm formation ability of isolates was assessed using the tube adherence method. ESBL-positive isolates were screened for blaTEM, blaCTX-M, and blaSHV genes by polymerase chain reaction. Results: Among the examined isolates, 25 (25.5%) were detected as ESBL producers and harbored at least one of the studied genes. The blaCTX-M was the predominant (44%) gene, followed by blaTEM (24%) and blaSHV (8%). The isolates revealed variable resistance levels to all antimicrobials, out of which 55.1% were conferred a high resistance rate to different antibiotic classes and considered MDR. Phenotypically, 42.85% of the isolates were biofilm formers, of which the majority (38%) formed moderate biofilms. Conclusions: This study showed that the ESBL-positive isolates were more resistant to some first-line antibiotics, and this highlights the necessity to control and monitor the prescribed antibiotics used for empirical treatment for UTI patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产超广谱β-内酰胺酶大肠杆菌生物膜形成及耐药性评价
背景:耐多药(MDR)大肠杆菌菌株,特别是产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)菌株的流行率越来越高,已成为全球健康问题。本研究旨在确定尿路感染(UTI)大肠杆菌分离株中blaCTX-M、blaTEM和blaSHV基因的频率,并评估其抗生素耐药性模式。方法:从尿路感染患者的尿液中分离出98株大肠杆菌。根据临床实验室标准研究所指南,通过椎间盘扩散法和联合椎间盘法评估抗生素耐药性和ESBL产生。使用试管粘附法评估分离物的生物膜形成能力。用聚合酶链式反应筛选ESBL阳性菌株的blaTEM、blaCTX-M和blaSHV基因。结果:在所检测的分离株中,25株(25.5%)被检测为ESBL产生者,并且至少携带一个所研究的基因。blaCTX-M基因占优势(44%),其次是blaTEM(24%)和blaSHV(8%)。这些分离株对所有抗菌药物的耐药性水平各不相同,其中55.1%的分离株对不同类别的抗生素具有较高的耐药性,并被认为是MDR。典型的是,42.85%的分离株是生物膜形成者,其中大多数(38%)形成中等程度的生物膜。结论:本研究表明ESBL阳性分离株对某些一线抗生素更具耐药性,这突出了控制和监测用于UTI患者经验性治疗的处方抗生素的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal
Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
42.90%
发文量
24
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association of sex hormone-binding globulin gene polymorphism and sex hormone-binding globulin levels in postmenopausal women in relation to type 2 diabetes mellitus – A case–Control study Prevalence and Risk Factors for Hypogonadism in Male Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Cycle threshold value and coronavirus disease 2019 clinical type among smokers and nonsmokers reveal no significant association despite clinical type shows smokers are at high risk: A retrospective study Cytochrome P450 gene and pediatric epilepsy: An observational study Identification of hub genes in the fructose-1, 6 bisphosphate 1-protein interaction network based on differential expression, and survival impact on hepatocellular carcinoma patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1