Quantum Theory and Bergson’s Subjectivist Conception of Time: Is It Possible to Reconcile Duration and Quantum Time?

Q4 Arts and Humanities Pro-Fil Pub Date : 2022-12-28 DOI:10.5817/pf22-2-28200
Karolína Zapalačová
{"title":"Quantum Theory and Bergson’s Subjectivist Conception of Time: Is It Possible to Reconcile Duration and Quantum Time?","authors":"Karolína Zapalačová","doi":"10.5817/pf22-2-28200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1922, Albert Einstein rejected Bergson’s concept of time. He even declared that Bergson’s duration did not exist, something that Bergson never quite came to terms with. On the other hand, some of Bergson’s reflections indicated that in a certain respect he was close to the spirit of modern physics, especially quantum theory. The author, therefore, asks whether it is possible to equate Bergson’s duration with the quantum space-time continuum and thus rehabilitate Bergson’s concept. The first part of the article, in addition to the definition of duration, focuses on the connection of the subject, time, and matter in Bergson, which represents one of the points of contact with quantum theory. The second part describes the role of the subject in quantum theory. The third part presents the definition of the mentioned space-time continuum. The final section compares the two concepts and answers the research question.","PeriodicalId":53428,"journal":{"name":"Pro-Fil","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro-Fil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/pf22-2-28200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1922, Albert Einstein rejected Bergson’s concept of time. He even declared that Bergson’s duration did not exist, something that Bergson never quite came to terms with. On the other hand, some of Bergson’s reflections indicated that in a certain respect he was close to the spirit of modern physics, especially quantum theory. The author, therefore, asks whether it is possible to equate Bergson’s duration with the quantum space-time continuum and thus rehabilitate Bergson’s concept. The first part of the article, in addition to the definition of duration, focuses on the connection of the subject, time, and matter in Bergson, which represents one of the points of contact with quantum theory. The second part describes the role of the subject in quantum theory. The third part presents the definition of the mentioned space-time continuum. The final section compares the two concepts and answers the research question.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量子理论与柏格森的主观时间观:时间与量子时间的调和可能吗?
1922年,阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦拒绝了柏格森的时间概念。他甚至宣称柏格森的任期并不存在,柏格森从未完全接受过这一点。另一方面,柏格森的一些思考表明,他在某种程度上接近现代物理学的精神,尤其是量子理论。因此,作者质疑是否有可能将柏格森的持续时间等同于量子时空连续体,从而恢复柏格森的概念。文章的第一部分,除了持续时间的定义外,还重点讨论了Bergson中主体、时间和物质的联系,这代表了与量子理论的接触点之一。第二部分介绍了该学科在量子理论中的作用。第三部分给出了上述时空连续体的定义。最后对这两个概念进行了比较,并回答了研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pro-Fil
Pro-Fil Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Electronic journal of philosophy Pro-Fil is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes articles addressing a whole range of philosophical topics as well as contributions from natural sciences focusing on philosophically relevant issues. We welcome original papers, reviews, polemics, interviews, abstracts, announcements, audio and video recordings of lectures as well as instructional and educational materials in Czech, Slovak, English, and German.
期刊最新文献
“A Crowd of Gorgons and Winged Horses”. A Critique of Socratic Philosophers in Athenaeus’ The Deipnosophists The Spectrality of Shame in Plato’s Menexenus The Social, Therapeutic and Didactic Dimension of Shame in Seneca’s Thinking Heinrich Heine: Předposlední dny bohů Spinoza’s Model of God: Pantheism or Panentheism?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1