La Solidaridad o la Soledad? Cooperation and Tensions in the Regional State Response to the Venezuelan Migration Crisis

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Studies in Social Justice Pub Date : 2022-11-07 DOI:10.26522/ssj.v16i3.2723
Lana Gonzalez Balyk
{"title":"La Solidaridad o la Soledad? Cooperation and Tensions in the Regional State Response to the Venezuelan Migration Crisis","authors":"Lana Gonzalez Balyk","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v16i3.2723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Venezuelan migration crisis has displaced over six million people and is the Americas’ largest forced migration. Nearby countries have received the majority of the displaced and initially showed an impressive welcome to Venezuelans, regardless of whether they may be considered migrants, asylum seekers, or refugees. However, host country responses have mainly been uncoordinated, siloed, and impromptu. This paper examines the solidarities and tensions within the individual country responses of Venezuela’s closest Latin American and Andean neighbors: Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Chile, and Brazil. The number of displaced people leaving Venezuela has steadily increased since 2015 yet limited long term-planning and inclusion of migrants in host communities has led to a growth in xenophobia. Additionally, many Latin American host nations have erected new barriers that make legal entry or residency forms more difficult for migrants to obtain. The COVID-19 pandemic has compounded these issues as host countries grapple with supporting and offering resources to their citizens in addition to migrants. However, some promising regional solutions could be applied in a more coordinated regional approach to help ensure that host countries and IOs supporting them can better extend enduring solidarity and inclusion to Venezuelans. These solutions include longer-term visa options, such as the new Colombian 10-year visa, that can help regularize and include Venezuelans over a prolonged period. A particularly recommended approach would be the regional application of an inventive Latin America humanitarian-orientated accord, the Cartagena Declaration, a forward-thinking concept with a potential that has never been realized. The Cartagena Declaration could offer more comprehensive protection and fairer access to rights beyond temporary measures.","PeriodicalId":44923,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Social Justice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v16i3.2723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Venezuelan migration crisis has displaced over six million people and is the Americas’ largest forced migration. Nearby countries have received the majority of the displaced and initially showed an impressive welcome to Venezuelans, regardless of whether they may be considered migrants, asylum seekers, or refugees. However, host country responses have mainly been uncoordinated, siloed, and impromptu. This paper examines the solidarities and tensions within the individual country responses of Venezuela’s closest Latin American and Andean neighbors: Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Chile, and Brazil. The number of displaced people leaving Venezuela has steadily increased since 2015 yet limited long term-planning and inclusion of migrants in host communities has led to a growth in xenophobia. Additionally, many Latin American host nations have erected new barriers that make legal entry or residency forms more difficult for migrants to obtain. The COVID-19 pandemic has compounded these issues as host countries grapple with supporting and offering resources to their citizens in addition to migrants. However, some promising regional solutions could be applied in a more coordinated regional approach to help ensure that host countries and IOs supporting them can better extend enduring solidarity and inclusion to Venezuelans. These solutions include longer-term visa options, such as the new Colombian 10-year visa, that can help regularize and include Venezuelans over a prolonged period. A particularly recommended approach would be the regional application of an inventive Latin America humanitarian-orientated accord, the Cartagena Declaration, a forward-thinking concept with a potential that has never been realized. The Cartagena Declaration could offer more comprehensive protection and fairer access to rights beyond temporary measures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
团结还是团结?区域国家应对委内瑞拉移民危机的合作与紧张局势
委内瑞拉移民危机已使600多万人流离失所,是美洲最大的强迫移民。附近国家接收了大多数流离失所者,最初对委内瑞拉人表示了令人印象深刻的欢迎,无论他们是移民、寻求庇护者还是难民。然而,东道国的反应主要是不协调、孤立和即兴的。本文考察了委内瑞拉最亲密的拉丁美洲和安第斯邻国哥伦比亚、厄瓜多尔、秘鲁、智利和巴西在各自国家应对措施中的团结和紧张关系。自2015年以来,离开委内瑞拉的流离失所者人数稳步增加,但长期规划有限,移民融入收容社区,导致仇外心理加剧。此外,许多拉丁美洲东道国设置了新的障碍,使移民更难获得合法入境或居留表格。新冠肺炎疫情加剧了这些问题,因为东道国除了移民外,还努力为本国公民提供支持和资源。然而,一些有希望的区域解决方案可以采用更协调的区域方法,以帮助确保东道国和支持它们的国际组织能够更好地向委内瑞拉人提供持久的团结和包容。这些解决方案包括长期签证选择,例如新的哥伦比亚10年签证,这有助于委内瑞拉人长期合法化并将其纳入其中。一个特别建议的办法是在区域适用一项富有创造性的、以拉丁美洲人道主义为导向的协定,即《卡塔赫纳宣言》,这是一个具有从未实现的潜力的前瞻性概念。《卡塔赫纳宣言》可以在临时措施之外提供更全面的保护和更公平地获得权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Social Justice
Studies in Social Justice POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Super Visa Program: Immigration Policy Changes and Social Injustice under the Neoliberal Governmentality in Canada Infrastructures of Harm, Communities of Knowledge and Environmental Justice Risky Others: Covid-19 Reconstitutions of Risk, Governance, and Stigmatization of Bodies Landscapes of Injustice, Landscapes of Repair (Editor's Introduction) Collective Memories and Community Interventions: Peace Building in Northern Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1