Selection of Best Practices that Enhance Phase-Based Cost and Schedule Performances in Complex Construction Projects

IF 1.9 4区 管理学 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Engineering Management Journal Pub Date : 2022-03-16 DOI:10.1080/10429247.2022.2036068
Elnaz Safapour, Sharareh Kermanshachi, Issa J. Ramaji
{"title":"Selection of Best Practices that Enhance Phase-Based Cost and Schedule Performances in Complex Construction Projects","authors":"Elnaz Safapour, Sharareh Kermanshachi, Issa J. Ramaji","doi":"10.1080/10429247.2022.2036068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A common assumption made by construction professionals is that complex projects are more likely than simple ones to entail cost overruns and delays. Although several researchers have studied the critical causes of complexity and have identified their indicators (CIs), few of them have investigated how they actually impact a project’s schedule and cost performance during the design, procurement, and construction phases. This research aimed to study the impact of each CI and determine the most effective best practices (BPs) for preventing it. Data from 44 case studies were collected and analyzed, and the results revealed that implementing the BPs of team building, front-end planning (FEP), constructability, alignment, partnering, and change management significantly reduces cost overruns and delays in all three phases of complex construction projects and, in fact, can improve the cost and schedule performance, due to fewer complex challenges. The outcomes of this research will help project managers identify the challenges that stem from complex aspects of projects and lead to phase-base cost overruns and time delays. They will also assist decision-makers in deciding which are the most effective BPs for mitigating challenges stemming from the characteristics that make projects complex and will them improve phase-based cost and schedule performance in complex construction projects.","PeriodicalId":54353,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Management Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"84 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2022.2036068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract A common assumption made by construction professionals is that complex projects are more likely than simple ones to entail cost overruns and delays. Although several researchers have studied the critical causes of complexity and have identified their indicators (CIs), few of them have investigated how they actually impact a project’s schedule and cost performance during the design, procurement, and construction phases. This research aimed to study the impact of each CI and determine the most effective best practices (BPs) for preventing it. Data from 44 case studies were collected and analyzed, and the results revealed that implementing the BPs of team building, front-end planning (FEP), constructability, alignment, partnering, and change management significantly reduces cost overruns and delays in all three phases of complex construction projects and, in fact, can improve the cost and schedule performance, due to fewer complex challenges. The outcomes of this research will help project managers identify the challenges that stem from complex aspects of projects and lead to phase-base cost overruns and time delays. They will also assist decision-makers in deciding which are the most effective BPs for mitigating challenges stemming from the characteristics that make projects complex and will them improve phase-based cost and schedule performance in complex construction projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高复杂建设项目阶段成本和进度绩效的最佳实践选择
摘要建筑专业人士的一个常见假设是,复杂的项目比简单的项目更有可能导致成本超支和延误。尽管一些研究人员已经研究了复杂性的关键原因,并确定了他们的指标(CI),但他们中很少有人调查它们在设计、采购和施工阶段如何实际影响项目的进度和成本效益。本研究旨在研究每个CI的影响,并确定预防CI的最有效最佳实践(BP)。收集并分析了44个案例研究的数据,结果表明,实施团队建设、前端规划(FEP)、可施工性、对齐、合作,变更管理大大减少了复杂建筑项目所有三个阶段的成本超支和延误,事实上,由于复杂挑战较少,可以提高成本和进度绩效。这项研究的结果将帮助项目经理识别项目复杂方面带来的挑战,并导致阶段基础成本超支和时间延误。他们还将帮助决策者决定哪些是最有效的BP,以缓解因项目复杂性而产生的挑战,并将提高复杂建筑项目中基于阶段的成本和进度绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Management Journal
Engineering Management Journal 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: EMJ is designed to provide practical, pertinent knowledge on the management of technology, technical professionals, and technical organizations. EMJ strives to provide value to the practice of engineering management and engineering managers. EMJ is an archival journal that facilitates both practitioners and university faculty in publishing useful articles. The primary focus is on articles that improve the practice of engineering management. To support the practice of engineering management, EMJ publishes papers within key engineering management content areas. EMJ Editors will continue to refine these areas to ensure they are aligned with the challenges faced by technical organizations and technical managers.
期刊最新文献
Lean Office: Proposition and Application of a Process-Mapping Method Based on the Shingo Production Mechanism (SPM) Managing Stakeholder Pressure for Megaproject Success and Green Innovation: The Key Role of Social Responsibility Engineering Management Education: Washington Accord Accreditation Programs The New PAD: A Method to Implement the Lean Construction Principles A Risk Minimization Model for a Multi-Skilled, Multi-Mode Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem with Discrete Time-Cost-Quality-Risk Trade-Off
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1