Doppler ultrasound assessment of the stability of pelvicring in lateral-compression-1 pelvic fracture: a preliminary study

Hai-jing Huang, Binfei Zhang, Hong Zhang, Pengfei Wang, Y. Cong, Shuang Han, Ping Liu, Chao Ke, Kun Shang, Hu Wang, Kun Zhang, Y. Zhuang
{"title":"Doppler ultrasound assessment of the stability of pelvicring in lateral-compression-1 pelvic fracture: a preliminary study","authors":"Hai-jing Huang, Binfei Zhang, Hong Zhang, Pengfei Wang, Y. Cong, Shuang Han, Ping Liu, Chao Ke, Kun Shang, Hu Wang, Kun Zhang, Y. Zhuang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-7600.2019.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the application of Doppler ultrasound to assess the stability of pelvic ring in treatment of lateral-compression-1 (LC-1) pelvic fractures. \n \n \nMethods \nFor this prospective study 38 patients with LC-1 pelvic fracture were enrolled who had been admitted to the Department of Orthopedic Trauma, Honghui Hospital from July 2016 to November 2017. They were 22 men and 16 women with an age of 55.2±16.1 years. After the patient's condition was stable, they underwent a Doppler ultrasound examination in the pelvic compression separation test. According to the criteria preset: those with a left-right mobility ≥ 0.3 cm were assigned as an unstable group (16 cases) and those with a mobility<0.3 cm as a stable group (22 cases). The stable group received conservative treatment while the unstable group surgical treatment. The 2 groups were compared in terms of mobility of fracture ends, follow-up time, weight-bearing time, fracture healing time, and the Majeed scores of pelvic function at the last follow-up. \n \n \nResults \nThe 2 groups were compatible due to their insignificant differences in baseline data(P>0.05). The mobility of fracture ends (left-right distance: 0.45±0.22 cm; anterior-posterior distance: 0.26±0.16 cm; oblique distance: 0.50±0.23 cm) in the unstable group was all significantly greater than in the stable group (left-right distance: 0.11±0.03 cm; anterior-posterior distance: 0.05±0.04 cm; oblique distance: 0.11±0.07 cm) (P 0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nSince ultrasonography is helpful in assessment of the stability of LC-1 pelvic fractures, a proper treatment strategy can be decided. Stable ones can be treated conservatively and unstable ones surgically. \n \n \nKey words: \nPelvis; Fractures, bone; Lateral compression; Ultrasonography, doppler; Stability","PeriodicalId":10145,"journal":{"name":"中华创伤骨科杂志","volume":"21 1","pages":"1036-1040"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华创伤骨科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-7600.2019.12.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To explore the application of Doppler ultrasound to assess the stability of pelvic ring in treatment of lateral-compression-1 (LC-1) pelvic fractures. Methods For this prospective study 38 patients with LC-1 pelvic fracture were enrolled who had been admitted to the Department of Orthopedic Trauma, Honghui Hospital from July 2016 to November 2017. They were 22 men and 16 women with an age of 55.2±16.1 years. After the patient's condition was stable, they underwent a Doppler ultrasound examination in the pelvic compression separation test. According to the criteria preset: those with a left-right mobility ≥ 0.3 cm were assigned as an unstable group (16 cases) and those with a mobility<0.3 cm as a stable group (22 cases). The stable group received conservative treatment while the unstable group surgical treatment. The 2 groups were compared in terms of mobility of fracture ends, follow-up time, weight-bearing time, fracture healing time, and the Majeed scores of pelvic function at the last follow-up. Results The 2 groups were compatible due to their insignificant differences in baseline data(P>0.05). The mobility of fracture ends (left-right distance: 0.45±0.22 cm; anterior-posterior distance: 0.26±0.16 cm; oblique distance: 0.50±0.23 cm) in the unstable group was all significantly greater than in the stable group (left-right distance: 0.11±0.03 cm; anterior-posterior distance: 0.05±0.04 cm; oblique distance: 0.11±0.07 cm) (P 0.05). Conclusions Since ultrasonography is helpful in assessment of the stability of LC-1 pelvic fractures, a proper treatment strategy can be decided. Stable ones can be treated conservatively and unstable ones surgically. Key words: Pelvis; Fractures, bone; Lateral compression; Ultrasonography, doppler; Stability
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多普勒超声评价1型骨盆骨折骨盆固定稳定性的初步研究
目的探讨多普勒超声在评价骨盆环稳定性中的应用。方法本前瞻性研究纳入了2016年7月至2017年11月入住红会医院创伤骨科的38例LC-1型骨盆骨折患者。他们分别是22名男性和16名女性,年龄为55.2±16.1岁。在患者病情稳定后,他们在骨盆压缩分离测试中接受了多普勒超声检查。根据预设的标准:将左右活动度≥0.3cm的患者分为不稳定组(16例)和活动度0.05的患者。不稳定组骨折端活动度(左右距离:0.45±0.22cm;前后距离:0.26±0.16cm;倾斜距离:0.50±0.23cm)均显著大于稳定组(左右距离0.11±0.03cm,前后距离0.05±0.04cm,斜距0.11±0.07cm)(P<0.05)。稳定的可以保守治疗,不稳定的可以手术治疗。关键词:骨盆;骨折,骨;侧向压缩;超声、多普勒;稳定性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7288
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Emergent foot and ankle surgery in the epidemic of COVID-19 Procedures and strategies for sterilization and management of surgical instruments for patients with orthopaedic trauma during COVID-19 epidemic Bone cement-enhanced proximal femoral nail antirotation for treatment of severe osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture Current and future management of hip fracture in the elderly Intercondylar ridge fracture: broad and narrow definitions and their clinical significance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1