Non-take-up of rights and precariousness in the Brussels Region

IF 0.1 Q4 URBAN STUDIES Brussels Studies Pub Date : 2021-05-30 DOI:10.4000/BRUSSELS.5593
L. Noël
{"title":"Non-take-up of rights and precariousness in the Brussels Region","authors":"L. Noël","doi":"10.4000/BRUSSELS.5593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-take-up of rights and services is a situation in which an eligible person does not benefit from one or more rights to which he or she is entitled. The Brussels Region in particular is confronted with the problem for several fundamental social rights. Analyses of individual situations, people's pathways and legal developments have shown specificities according to the benefits. Several factors emerge: legal changes in the granting and maintenance of social rights, the increase in the number of criteria and procedures to be completed, accessibility procedures and the growing complexity and instability of status in the pathways of people in precarious situations. A significant proportion of beneficiaries are discouraged and some professionals no longer feel able to verify or assert eligibility due to the growing complexity. Finally, the high level of digitalisation of services (public and private) prior to the pandemic which has accelerated since the first lockdown, reinforces the risk of non-take-up while there is a growing need for concrete, human help and simplification, as well as a deterioration of trust between citizens and the state.","PeriodicalId":53901,"journal":{"name":"Brussels Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brussels Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/BRUSSELS.5593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-take-up of rights and services is a situation in which an eligible person does not benefit from one or more rights to which he or she is entitled. The Brussels Region in particular is confronted with the problem for several fundamental social rights. Analyses of individual situations, people's pathways and legal developments have shown specificities according to the benefits. Several factors emerge: legal changes in the granting and maintenance of social rights, the increase in the number of criteria and procedures to be completed, accessibility procedures and the growing complexity and instability of status in the pathways of people in precarious situations. A significant proportion of beneficiaries are discouraged and some professionals no longer feel able to verify or assert eligibility due to the growing complexity. Finally, the high level of digitalisation of services (public and private) prior to the pandemic which has accelerated since the first lockdown, reinforces the risk of non-take-up while there is a growing need for concrete, human help and simplification, as well as a deterioration of trust between citizens and the state.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布鲁塞尔地区不行使权利和不稳定
不接受权利和服务是指符合条件的人没有从他或她有权享有的一项或多项权利中受益。布鲁塞尔地区尤其面临着一些基本社会权利的问题。对个人情况、人们的道路和法律发展的分析显示了根据利益的具体性。出现了几个因素:授予和维护社会权利方面的法律变化,需要完成的标准和程序数量增加,无障碍程序,以及处境危险的人在道路上的地位日益复杂和不稳定。很大一部分受益人被劝阻,由于复杂性的增加,一些专业人员不再觉得能够核实或断言资格。最后,自第一次封锁以来,疫情前服务(公共和私人)的高度数字化加速了,这增加了不接受的风险,同时人们越来越需要具体的人力帮助和简化,公民和国家之间的信任也在恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brussels Studies
Brussels Studies URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
66.70%
发文量
31
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Entre habitabilité et accessibilité au Bois de la Cambre Between liveability and accessibility in the Bois de la Cambre Het Ter Kamerenbos: tussen leefbaarheid en bereikbaarheid Openbare toiletten in de Brusselse openbare ruimten: noodzaak of overlast? Les toilettes publiques dans les espaces publics bruxellois : nécessité ou nuisance ?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1