Pedicled dorsal penile skin tube as neourethra in total penectomy for primary male urethral carcinoma

IF 0.2 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Clinical Urology Pub Date : 2022-11-24 DOI:10.1177/20514158221136340
C. Yepes, M. Bandini, P. Joshi, Ahmed A Alrefaey, S. Bhadranavar, S. Bafna, S. Kulkarni
{"title":"Pedicled dorsal penile skin tube as neourethra in total penectomy for primary male urethral carcinoma","authors":"C. Yepes, M. Bandini, P. Joshi, Ahmed A Alrefaey, S. Bhadranavar, S. Bafna, S. Kulkarni","doi":"10.1177/20514158221136340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to present our experience of pedicled dorsal penile skin tube as neourethra after radical penectomy due to invasive primary male carcinoma of anterior urethra. This is an observational descriptive study including seven men with primary urethral carcinoma who underwent radical penectomy between 2018 and 2021. Instead of urinary derivation with suprapubic catheter, perineal urethrostomy, or bladder orthotopic/heterotopic reconstruction, patients underwent reconstruction of the anterior urethra with a pedicled dorsal penile skin tube. In brief, before corpora amputation and radical urethrectomy, the dorsal penile skin is preserved to reconstruct the neourethra. The distal end of the skin is anastomosed with the proximal urethral stump (usually membranous urethra) to assure continuity of the urinary tract, without jeopardising urinary continence. Finally, the flap is tubularized with two layers of watertight running sutures. Median age was 50 (35–70) years. Histology revealed squamous cell carcinoma in all patients. Almost 100% of patients presented locally advanced (pT3–4, G3) disease and received perioperative chemotherapy (MVAC). The median follow-up was 10 (5–24) months. Median operative time was 230 min (190–315). There were not severe (Clavien–Dindo III–IV) perioperative complications. All patients were able to void in standing position through the reconstructed neourethra. No patients reported post-operative incontinence. Two patients died after 8 and 11 months from surgery. This new technique of using the dartos-based dorsal penile skin tube urethroplasty offers the possibility to void in standing position after radical penectomy with no need of urinary derivations. Not applicable.","PeriodicalId":15471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158221136340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present our experience of pedicled dorsal penile skin tube as neourethra after radical penectomy due to invasive primary male carcinoma of anterior urethra. This is an observational descriptive study including seven men with primary urethral carcinoma who underwent radical penectomy between 2018 and 2021. Instead of urinary derivation with suprapubic catheter, perineal urethrostomy, or bladder orthotopic/heterotopic reconstruction, patients underwent reconstruction of the anterior urethra with a pedicled dorsal penile skin tube. In brief, before corpora amputation and radical urethrectomy, the dorsal penile skin is preserved to reconstruct the neourethra. The distal end of the skin is anastomosed with the proximal urethral stump (usually membranous urethra) to assure continuity of the urinary tract, without jeopardising urinary continence. Finally, the flap is tubularized with two layers of watertight running sutures. Median age was 50 (35–70) years. Histology revealed squamous cell carcinoma in all patients. Almost 100% of patients presented locally advanced (pT3–4, G3) disease and received perioperative chemotherapy (MVAC). The median follow-up was 10 (5–24) months. Median operative time was 230 min (190–315). There were not severe (Clavien–Dindo III–IV) perioperative complications. All patients were able to void in standing position through the reconstructed neourethra. No patients reported post-operative incontinence. Two patients died after 8 and 11 months from surgery. This new technique of using the dartos-based dorsal penile skin tube urethroplasty offers the possibility to void in standing position after radical penectomy with no need of urinary derivations. Not applicable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带蒂阴茎背侧皮管作为新尿道在原发性男性尿道癌全切术中的应用
本文的目的是介绍我们的经验,带蒂阴茎背皮管作为新尿道根治术后,由于侵入性原发性男性前尿道癌。这是一项观察性描述性研究,包括7名原发性尿道癌男性,他们在2018年至2021年间接受了根治性尿道切开术。患者采用带蒂阴茎背侧皮管重建前尿道,而不是耻骨上导尿管、会阴尿道造口术或膀胱原位/异位重建。简言之,在尿道下体切除术和根治性尿道切除术之前,保留阴茎背侧皮肤以重建新尿道。皮肤的远端与近端尿道残端(通常是膜性尿道)吻合,以确保尿路的连续性,而不会危及尿失禁。最后,用两层不透水的连续缝线将皮瓣制成管状。中位年龄为50岁(35-70岁) 年。组织学检查显示所有患者均为鳞状细胞癌。几乎100%的患者出现局部晚期(pT3–4,G3)疾病,并接受围手术期化疗(MVAC)。中位随访时间为10(5-24) 月。中位手术时间为230 最小值(190–315)。没有严重的(Clavien–Dindo III–IV)围手术期并发症。所有患者都能够通过重建的新尿道以站立姿势排空。没有患者报告术后失禁。两名患者分别于8岁和11岁后死亡 手术后数月。这种使用基于dartos的阴茎背侧皮管尿道成形术的新技术提供了在不需要尿液衍生的情况下,在根治性切开术后以站立姿势排尿的可能性。不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Urology
Journal of Clinical Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic value of the abnormal digital rectal examination in the modern MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Comparison of the diagnostic utility of CHOKAI, STONE and STONE PLUS scores in predicting ureteral stones larger than 5 mm Quality of life and healthcare resource use in patients with bladder pain syndrome: A survey of UK patients Analysis of the learning curve for Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for a single surgeon Effectiveness of intravesical glycosaminoglycans in the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1