India’s Kochi Biennale: sponsorship, patronage, and art’s resistance

IF 0.7 Q4 BUSINESS Arts and the Market Pub Date : 2019-01-07 DOI:10.1108/AAM-11-2018-0015
Annamma Joy, R. Belk
{"title":"India’s Kochi Biennale: sponsorship, patronage, and art’s resistance","authors":"Annamma Joy, R. Belk","doi":"10.1108/AAM-11-2018-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to examine the meaning, in both local and international context, of the Kochi-Muziris Biennale (KMB), the first international exhibit of contemporary art in India. Kochi Biennale Foundation (KBF), which administers the KMB, identifies art as a means for transforming society, with a mission to bring global contemporary art to India and to present India’s modern art to the world. The authors further investigate the role of government sponsorship and corporate patronage in funding the KMB, and investigate how resistance through art is key to the KMB’s identity.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study focuses primarily on published materials relating to the KMB. One of the authors attended the 2016 KMB and interviewed fellow attendees. Additionally, the authors reviewed and assessed social media postings regarding the 2016 KMB.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors argue that government sponsorship and corporate patronage are never solely about political or financial power. Rather, a generalized reciprocity among the three entities – corporations, the government and the artists – allows the KMB to flourish. For the artists involved, the KMB, co-founded by activist artists, sustains interest in and awareness of resistance.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nExtant literature on biennales is sparse on ways in which these exhibits extend their impact beyond the art world. The authors examine issues such as India expanding its position on the world stage through art, and the implications of political resistance embraced by Indian artists on future directions for the KMB, that have heretofore been unaddressed.\n","PeriodicalId":42080,"journal":{"name":"Arts and the Market","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/AAM-11-2018-0015","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts and the Market","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/AAM-11-2018-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the meaning, in both local and international context, of the Kochi-Muziris Biennale (KMB), the first international exhibit of contemporary art in India. Kochi Biennale Foundation (KBF), which administers the KMB, identifies art as a means for transforming society, with a mission to bring global contemporary art to India and to present India’s modern art to the world. The authors further investigate the role of government sponsorship and corporate patronage in funding the KMB, and investigate how resistance through art is key to the KMB’s identity. Design/methodology/approach This study focuses primarily on published materials relating to the KMB. One of the authors attended the 2016 KMB and interviewed fellow attendees. Additionally, the authors reviewed and assessed social media postings regarding the 2016 KMB. Findings The authors argue that government sponsorship and corporate patronage are never solely about political or financial power. Rather, a generalized reciprocity among the three entities – corporations, the government and the artists – allows the KMB to flourish. For the artists involved, the KMB, co-founded by activist artists, sustains interest in and awareness of resistance. Originality/value Extant literature on biennales is sparse on ways in which these exhibits extend their impact beyond the art world. The authors examine issues such as India expanding its position on the world stage through art, and the implications of political resistance embraced by Indian artists on future directions for the KMB, that have heretofore been unaddressed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度高知双年展:赞助、赞助和艺术抵抗
目的本文的目的是在本地和国际背景下考察高知-穆齐里斯双年展(KMB)的意义,这是印度第一个国际当代艺术展览。管理九巴的高知双年展基金会(KBF)将艺术视为改造社会的一种手段,其使命是将全球当代艺术带到印度,并向世界展示印度的现代艺术。作者进一步调查了政府赞助和企业赞助在资助九巴方面的作用,并调查了通过艺术进行抵抗是九巴身份认同的关键。设计/方法/方法本研究主要关注已发表的与九巴有关的材料。其中一位作者出席了2016年九巴,并采访了其他与会者。此外,作者审查和评估了社交媒体上关于2016年KMB.Findings的帖子。作者认为,政府赞助和企业赞助从来都不仅仅是政治或财政权力。相反,企业、政府和艺术家这三个实体之间的普遍互惠关系使九巴得以蓬勃发展。对于参与的艺术家来说,由激进艺术家共同创立的九巴保持着对抵抗的兴趣和意识。原创性/价值双年展上的现有文献很少涉及这些展览将其影响扩展到艺术世界之外的方式。作者研究了一些问题,如印度通过艺术扩大其在世界舞台上的地位,以及印度艺术家所接受的政治抵抗对九巴未来发展方向的影响,这些问题迄今尚未得到解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Influence of movie-related online consumer reviews on movie choice: are there generational differences in processing information cues? Dance consumption and mood changes: Examining the role of gender and generational cohorts Participant-oriented evaluation through participatory action research: a case study of a community engagement approach Reading relationally: a proposal for relational-comparative research concerning city/capital of culture events Towards an “Evaluation Dilemmas Model” – designing an evaluation scheme for a European capital of culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1