Sperm motility is the best semen parameter to predict sperm DNA fragmentation

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urological Science Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.4103/uros.uros_175_20
Wei-lun Huang, Yi-Kai Chang, Sheng-Yung Tung, Bo-Hua Peng, Hong-Chiang Chang
{"title":"Sperm motility is the best semen parameter to predict sperm DNA fragmentation","authors":"Wei-lun Huang, Yi-Kai Chang, Sheng-Yung Tung, Bo-Hua Peng, Hong-Chiang Chang","doi":"10.4103/uros.uros_175_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) is associated with male infertility and abnormal semen parameters. However, the effect of SDF on each parameter may differ. In this study, we evaluated the correlation between different semen parameters and SDF to identify the most suitable predictor for abnormal SDF. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review from a prospective database. Enrollees who underwent conventional semen analysis and an SDF test for medical purposes or elective examinations were enrolled. SDF ≥20% was regarded as abnormal. Spearman correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlations. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to determine the predictive value. Youden index was used to determine the optimal cutoff value of conventional semen parameters to predict abnormal SDF. Results: In total, 90 men were enrolled, of whom 44 (48.89%) visited for infertility and 51 (56.67%) had abnormal semen analysis. Immotile sperm (IM) and nonprogressive sperm (NPS, NPS = nonprogressive motility + IM) were significantly correlated with SDF (r = 0.50, P < 0.001 for NPS; r = 0.49, P < 0.001 for IM) and were the most predictive for abnormal SDF (AUC = 0.77 for NPS; AUC = 0.78 for IM). By using Youden index, the cutoff values for the prediction of abnormal SDF were 66.37% for NPS and 48.73% for IM. Conclusion: Sperm motility is the most predictive and relevant parameter for the prediction of abnormal SDF. Suboptimal sperm motility should be considered an indication for SDF testing.","PeriodicalId":23449,"journal":{"name":"Urological Science","volume":"32 1","pages":"157 - 163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urological Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/uros.uros_175_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) is associated with male infertility and abnormal semen parameters. However, the effect of SDF on each parameter may differ. In this study, we evaluated the correlation between different semen parameters and SDF to identify the most suitable predictor for abnormal SDF. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review from a prospective database. Enrollees who underwent conventional semen analysis and an SDF test for medical purposes or elective examinations were enrolled. SDF ≥20% was regarded as abnormal. Spearman correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlations. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to determine the predictive value. Youden index was used to determine the optimal cutoff value of conventional semen parameters to predict abnormal SDF. Results: In total, 90 men were enrolled, of whom 44 (48.89%) visited for infertility and 51 (56.67%) had abnormal semen analysis. Immotile sperm (IM) and nonprogressive sperm (NPS, NPS = nonprogressive motility + IM) were significantly correlated with SDF (r = 0.50, P < 0.001 for NPS; r = 0.49, P < 0.001 for IM) and were the most predictive for abnormal SDF (AUC = 0.77 for NPS; AUC = 0.78 for IM). By using Youden index, the cutoff values for the prediction of abnormal SDF were 66.37% for NPS and 48.73% for IM. Conclusion: Sperm motility is the most predictive and relevant parameter for the prediction of abnormal SDF. Suboptimal sperm motility should be considered an indication for SDF testing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精子活力是预测精子DNA断裂的最佳精液参数
目的:精子DNA断裂(SDF)与男性不育和精液参数异常有关。但是,SDF对每个参数的影响可能不同。在本研究中,我们评估了不同精液参数与SDF之间的相关性,以确定异常SDF的最合适预测因子。材料和方法:我们从一个前瞻性数据库中进行了回顾性审查。为医学目的或选择性检查而接受常规精液分析和SDF测试的受试者被纳入研究。SDF≥20%为异常。Spearman相关系数用于确定相关性。计算受试者工作特性曲线下面积曲线下面积(AUC)以确定预测值。Youden指数用于确定常规精液参数的最佳截断值,以预测异常SDF。结果:共有90名男性入选,其中44人(48.89%)因不孕而就诊,51人(56.67%)精液分析异常。免疫性精子(IM)和非进展性精子(NPS,NPS=非进展性运动+IM)与SDF显著相关(NPS为0.50,P<0.001;IM为0.49,P<0.001),并且最能预测异常SDF(NPS为AUC=0.77;IM为AUC=0.78)。通过使用Youden指数,NPS和IM异常SDF的预测截止值分别为66.37%和48.73%。结论:精子活力是预测SDF异常的最具预测性和相关性的参数。精子运动能力不理想应被视为SDF测试的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urological Science
Urological Science UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical guidelines of patient-centered bladder management of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction due to chronic spinal cord injury – Part 3: Surgical treatment in chronic spinal cord injured patients Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney: Clinicopathological profile and outcomes “Rule of Five” in Ureteral Dilatation and its Role in Ureteral Access Sheath Placement during Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Testicular tumor patients presented with scrotal violation-nonstandard surgical approach and its survival rate Level of scientific evidence underlying recommendations arising from the functional urology guidelines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1